Question: What defenses might the auditors use to rebut any charges made about their (deficient) audit?
Kay & Lee LLP was retained as the auditor for Holligan Industries to audit the financial statements required by prospective banks as a prerequisite to extending a loan to the client. The auditor knows whichever bank lends money to the client is likely to rely on the audited statements.
After the audit report is issued, the bank that ultimately made the loan discovers that the audit client’s inventory and
The auditors asserted that there was no way for them to know that the client included in the inventory account $1 million of merchandise in transit to a customer on December 31, 2015. The shipping terms were unclear so the auditors accepted management’s representations in that regard (FOB Destination). As for the receivables, the auditors claimed the client falsified confirmations by sending them to a post office address, retrieving them, and then confirming the stated balances.
Question:
What defenses might the auditors use to rebut any charges made about their (deficient) audit?
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
