researcher would like to evaluate the claim that a new drug, "Acne Buster" can help individuals eliminate acne. Participants were randomly assigned to 2 different groups. One group of participants is given the Acne Buster pill daily and the other group is given a placebo (sugar pill). The researcher records the number of acne outbreaks each individual experiences during the 30-day trial run. What type of study (correlational, longitudinal, experimental, naturalistic observation) is this?

researcher would like to evaluate the claim that a new drug, "Acne Buster" can help individuals eliminate acne. Participants were randomly assigned to 2 different groups. One group of participants is given the Acne Buster pill daily and the other group is given a placebo (sugar pill). The researcher records the number of acne outbreaks each individual experiences during the 30-day trial run. What type of study (correlational, longitudinal, experimental, naturalistic observation) is this?

Nutrition Now

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337415408

Author:Brown

Publisher:Brown

Chapter3: Ways Of Knowing About Nutrition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Now consider the use of Table 1 within the nursing research article. When reading research articles, many people will skip over the tables and figures. Why do you think the authors included it? Was it helpful? Why or why not? Note: I can't post the article but here's a paragraph where Table 1 is mentioned. RESULTS Patient selection and baseline characteristics Between 2010 and 2015, 132 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer at the Diakonessenhuis. Four patients were excluded from further analysis because they were treated elsewhere. Therefore, 128 patients were included in this study. Baseline characteristics for patients aged
A study of smoking and lung cancer was conducted in a small island population. There were a total of 1,000 people in the study, and the study participants were followed over a ten year period. Four hundred were smokers and 600 were not. Of the smokers, fifty developed lung cancer. Of the non-smokers, 10 developed lung cancer. Calculate the relevant measure of association, interpret and make a conclusion. Compute Attributable Risk and interpret . Describe the difference between incidence rate and the prevalence rate.
What patterns do you detect? Often in disease outbreak investigations we want to see a pattern for a particular problem. Think back to the 'white board' approach from a previous question and consider the types of information about individuals that may help you look for patterns. Select from the list below attributes that may help you You can chosse all or some I choose Time of disease onset and occuption but there is more I guess Occupation Hair color Gender Weight Age Time of disease onset
Your screening facility can process 1,000 people per week. Assume you are attempting the early detection of a disease with a prevalence of 2%, and your test has a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 90%. D- what is the positive predictive value of the screening test? E- what is the negative predictive value of the screening test? F- what would happen to the negative predictive value of the screening test if the prevalence was 5%?
The point of the ethical principle to “do no harm” is an agreement to reassure the public that in all ways the health care team not only works to heal patients but agree to do this in the least painful and harmful way possible. Why do you think the principle of Non-Maleficence describes this agreement?
In a quantitative research journal found on the internet having a pharmacoepidemiologic study designs (such as quasi-experimental study design, quantitative research designs), give at least 5 positive and 5 negative points on the journal you have reviewed (please provide the title of the journal)
he first involved an assessment of the relationship between cigarette smoking and incidence of lung cancer. For cigarette smokers, the lung cancer incidence rate was Ie = 200 per 100,000. For nonsmokers, the lung cancer incidence rate was Io = 25 per 100,000. The lung cancer incidence rate in the entire population was It = 100 per 100,000. The second study involved an assessment of the relationship between cigarette smoking and incidence of coronary heart disease. For cigarette smokers, the coronary heart disease incidence rate was Ie = 500 per 100,000. For nonsmokers, it was Io = 250 per 100,000. In the overall population, the coronary heart disease rate was It = 300. 1. What is relative risk the of developing lung cancer in the first study and of developing coronary heart disease in the second study? Interpret. 2. From the data involving cigarette smoking and lung cancer incidence, what are the attributable risk and the attributable-risk percent? Interpret the result. 3. From the…
What are the strengths of twin studies with regard to other epidemiologic study designs? What makes them particularly useful when studying health outcomes?
Which one of the following is NOT a consequence of over-diagnosing a potentially benign disease? It increases anxiety and unnecessary treatment of the disease It increases incidence of the disease It increases prevalence of the disease It increases demand for health care resources It increases mortality from the disease
For each of the studies below, put an “A” if it is an example of analytic epidemiology or a “B” if is an example of descriptive epidemiology. __________ Analysis of US mortality data to determine the rates of colorectal cancer deaths for white (non-Hispanic), black (non-Hispanic) and Hispanics in 2012. __________ Analysis of survey and laboratory data to determine if individuals with a high salt diet have higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure. ______ Case-control study to determine if patients with a current diagnosis of breast cancer had ever received hormone replacement therapy. ______ Analysis of medical records to determine if diagnosis of hypertension is more or less common among adults age 65 or older compared to those younger than age 65.
Why do you think we should have "inclusion/exclusion criteria" section in a clinical study protocol? In order to have better recruitment in a clinical study, one should keep the exclusion criteria to the minimum. Do you think this is a good practice or not? And why? What would be the impact in each case?
Which of the following is the most appropriate measure of association used in case-control studies? a. Hazard Ratio b. Odds Ratio c. Prevalence Ratio d. Relative Risk or Risk Ratio