Some systems analysts don't think it's necessary to keep track of the source code. They say that by removing the requirement for an intermediary stage, all information may be immediately entered into the system, saving time. Does this sentence make sense to you? How important are source materials in achieving success in your work?

Some systems analysts don't think it's necessary to keep track of the source code. They say that by removing the requirement for an intermediary stage, all information may be immediately entered into the system, saving time. Does this sentence make sense to you? How important are source materials in achieving success in your work?

Principles of Information Systems (MindTap Course List)

12th Edition

ISBN:9781285867168

Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Publisher:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Chapter13: Systems Development: Construction, Integration And Testing, Implementation, Operation And Maintenance, And Disposal

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9SAT: _______ is the process of analysing systems to make sure they are operating as intended and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

_______ is the process of analysing systems to make sure they are operating as intended and comparing the performance and benefits of the system as it was designed with the actual performance and benefits of the system in operation.
Some systems analysts don't think it's necessary to keep track of the source code. They say that by removing the requirement for an intermediary stage, all information may be immediately entered into the system, saving time. Does this sentence make sense to you? How important are source materials in achieving success in your work?
A small number of systems analysts believe that source documentation are superfluous. They claim that all information may be inputted directly into the system, saving time by eliminating the need for an intermediate step. Do you agree with this statement? Do you have any examples of circumstances in which source documents are critical to success?
Some systems analysts maintain that source documents are unnecessary. They say that all input can be entered directly into the system, without wasting time in an intermediate step. Do you agree? Can you think of any situations where source documents are essential?
Some systems analysts believe it is unnecessary to maintain the source code. They claim that by eliminating the need for an intermediate step, all information may be put directly into the system, saving time. Do you understand this sentence? How crucial are source materials to the success of your project?
This is one question When developing a new system, which of the following comes first? In what order do these activities have to be performed? Does the one that comes first have to be finished before the others are started? Briefly explain your answers. • Requirements? • Design? • Architecture? • Expectations?
When talking about a system, what exactly do we mean when we say "test it?" Outline the many methods of testing that may be performed.
a) In your opinion, at what point in time should users get training on a new system?b)which phase of the system life cycle is considered to be the most innovative and challenging?b) In which step of the SDCL life cycle does the cost of mistake correction decrease to its lowest point?
Imagine that you have been hired by a firm to work as a system analyst for the company that you are now working for. Do you think there are any similarities or differences between the activities that are engaged in the life cycle of system development and the activities that are included in the process of system maintenance? Kindly offer a response that takes into account the persuasive reasons and supports them.
Some systems analysts maintain that source documents are unnecessary. They say that all input can be entered directly into the system, without wasting time in an intermediate step. Do you agree? Why do you agree or disagree? Can you think of any situations where source documents are essential?
Why do you believe it is vital to design a system in order to find out what the needs of the system are? Please illustrate your point with a concrete example.
Think about this: As a software engineer, you're presently creating a patient control application for a medical facility. Everything looks great, and you can count on the reliability of the system. Have a process model in mind for developing this kind of software? In addition to a clear visual depiction, an accurate and concise explanation of the ideal process model is required.