Answered: State the risk rating of the respective…

State the risk rating of the respective FIVE (5) risk exposures mentioned below. Loss of physical assets Loss of human capital Technology/ equipment failure Operational loss Loss of supply

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5.1SA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
State TWO (2) appropriate risk strategies that can be applied in managing the potential FIVE (5)risk and loss exposures mentioned below Loss of physical assets Loss of human capital Technology/ equipment failure Operational loss Loss of supply
. Draw a basic Risk Matrix (Probability vs. Impact) and plot the following FIVE (5) risks. Loss of physical assets Loss of human capital Technology/ equipment failure Operational loss Loss of supply Public Liability
Draw a basic Risk Matrix (Probability vs. Impact) and plot the following. Loss of physical assets Loss of human capital Technology/ equipment failure Operational loss Loss of supply Public Liability
State TWO (2) appropriate risk strategies that can be applied in managing the potential FIVE (5) risk and loss exposures as mentioned below ; Loss of physical assets ii. Loss of human capital iii. Technology/ equipment failure iv. Operational loss Loss of supply
In connection to Risk Management, what is the reward for risk taking? Subsidies Low taxes Efficient Operations Profits
System and network risk classifications? Real-life dangers?
The projected industry growth promises greater prospects for the Lancewood business. Examine the potential risk levels posed to Lancewood when expanding their business deeper into South Africa and further into Africa, due to the following risk factors: • Theft • Human error.
Theme parks are considered a staple family attraction worldwide, known best for their rides and rollercoasters that appeal to thrill-seeking children and adults alike. Its success and profitability are maintained by installing more daring rides and appealing to popular cultural figures and franchises. However, due to the nature of theme park rides, the results can be incredibly serious when something goes wrong, and the stakes for theme park managers in ensuring the safety of their facilities are very high. Over the years, failure to comply with health and safety regulations, poor management systems, and mechanical defects have led to unfortunate incidents on various rides and rollercoasters, resulting in serious consequences. In 2005, an incident on the Smiler ride at Alton Towers caused by the failure of a test carriage that collided with a carriage carrying 16 people led to serious injuries, prosecution, and a £5million fine to the operating company, Merlin Attractions Operations…
Theme parks are considered a staple family attraction worldwide, known best for their rides and rollercoasters that appeal to thrill-seeking children and adults alike. Its success and profitability are maintained by installing more daring rides and appealing to popular cultural figures and franchises. However, due to the nature of theme park rides, the results can be incredibly serious when something goes wrong, and the stakes for theme park managers in ensuring the safety of their facilities. are very high. Over the years, failure to comply with health and safety regulations, poor management systems, and mechanical defects have led to unfortunate incidents on various rides and rollercoasters, resulting in serious consequences. In 2005, an incident on the Smiler ride at Alton Towers caused by the failure of a test carriage that collided with a carriage carrying 16 people led to serious injuries, prosecution, and a £5million fine to the operating company, Merlin Attractions Operations…