Suppose multiplication over rationals was defined as follows: "For any two rationals a//b and c//d where a, b, c, d 0 € Z, the product is given by a//bx c//d = ad//bc 22 Explain what goes wrong here and how does this definition restrict us in further developing the calculus of rationals. Provide sound mathematical reasoning to support your explanation.

Elements Of Modern Algebra
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285463230
Author:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Chapter5: Rings, Integral Domains, And Fields
Section5.4: Ordered Integral Domains
Problem 13E: 13. Prove that if and are rational numbers such that then there exists a rational number such...
icon
Related questions
Question

Suppose multiplication over rationals was defined as follows:


“ For any two rationals a//b and c//d where a, b, c, d not equal to 0 ∈ Z, the product is given by a//b × c//d = ad//bc ”


Explain what goes wrong here and how does this definition restrict us in further developing the calculus of rationals. Provide sound mathematical reasoning to support your explanation.

Suppose multiplication over rationals was defined as follows:
" For any two rationals a//b and c//d where a, b, c, d # 0 E Z, the product is given by
a//b x c//d = ad//bc
Explain what goes wrong here and how does this definition restrict us in further developing the calculus
of rationals. Provide sound mathematical reasoning to support your explanation.
Transcribed Image Text:Suppose multiplication over rationals was defined as follows: " For any two rationals a//b and c//d where a, b, c, d # 0 E Z, the product is given by a//b x c//d = ad//bc Explain what goes wrong here and how does this definition restrict us in further developing the calculus of rationals. Provide sound mathematical reasoning to support your explanation.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer