Suppose we have two different compilers, A and B, which each compile the same Java program to a particular computer’s machine language. Compiler A results in a program with 2.0 x 109 instructions and a CPU time of 1.1s. Compiler B results in a program with 2.4 x 109 instructions and a CPU time of 1.5s. What is the average CPI for each compiler’s program if the computer’s processor has a clock cycle time of 1ns? Suppose a new compiler C is developed which results in a program with 9.2 x 108 instructions and a CPI of 1.1. What is the speedup of using compiler C instead of compiler A? Instead of compiler B? Suppose we run the programs compiled by compilers A and B on two separate computers. Suppose also that the CPU time for each is exactly the same. How much faster is the clock running compiler A’s code versus the clock running compiler B’s code? (Hint: the first step is to calculate the total cycles each program requires)

Suppose we have two different compilers, A and B, which each compile the same Java program to a particular computer’s machine language. Compiler A results in a program with 2.0 x 109 instructions and a CPU time of 1.1s. Compiler B results in a program with 2.4 x 109 instructions and a CPU time of 1.5s. What is the average CPI for each compiler’s program if the computer’s processor has a clock cycle time of 1ns? Suppose a new compiler C is developed which results in a program with 9.2 x 108 instructions and a CPI of 1.1. What is the speedup of using compiler C instead of compiler A? Instead of compiler B? Suppose we run the programs compiled by compilers A and B on two separate computers. Suppose also that the CPU time for each is exactly the same. How much faster is the clock running compiler A’s code versus the clock running compiler B’s code? (Hint: the first step is to calculate the total cycles each program requires)

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter10: Application Development

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Question: Assume that for a program, compiler C results in an instruction count of 20000 and has an execution time of 50 microseconds. Given that the processor has a clock cycle of 2 ns, what is the average CPI? Question: Continue from the previous question. If a new compiler is developed that uses only 15000 instructions and has an average CPI of 1.3. What is The execution time of using the new compiler on the original processor?
(a) Suppose we need to implement a new programming language say, L, and we already have support of the C programming language on an existing machine M. Explain the different options with which we can achieve this considering that we have to reduce the effort to write assembly language or machine language code. (b) Continuing with the same design in part (a), suppose that a new machine M’ has been developed by a hardware manufacturer. Explain the different options with which we can support L on M’ using the design in part (a).
In no less than six points, please explain why everyone should become familiar with compilers.
From an academic standpoint, what are the six most compelling justifications for acquiring knowledge about compilers?
As a result of the development of programming languages such as Java and C++, software may now be less dependent on the underlying hardware. What exactly does it mean to be "machine independent," and how does this concept play a role in the design of modern systems? Could you please write a short essay for me on this topic?
Which phase during a compilation is completely optional and will not affect the output of the target code but only the efficiency of the target code. What is the least number of passes required to build a compiler with all its phases? What is the advantage of building a compiler with less passes? What is the advantage of building a compiler with more passes?
Composer is used to transform higher-level programs into ones with a lesser degree of complexity. The performance of the central processing unit (CPU) may be affected by the compiler. Why not give the idea some thought? However, there is still the question of whether or not it is really conceivable to provide a response to the problem. What gives you reason to believe that your response is correct?
Develop a program consisting of primitive CPU instructions to implement the following procedure: integer i,a; i = 0; while (i 10) do a = i2; i = i + 1; endwhile
If we are going to make use of the term "optimize compilers," does it have a meaning that is both straightforward and exhaustive? When it comes to developing software, under what circumstances would it be necessary for one of these to come in handy? In what kinds of situations would the use of a device such as this be deemed inappropriate?
What is the difference between a compiler and an interpreter in programming languages, and how does each approach to language execution impact performance and portability?
In what proportion of cases does a good compiler produce code that is superior to that written by an assembly language programmer on modern machines? So what if we try?
Is there a definition that is both simple and comprehensive for the term "optimize compilers," and how it should be used? If you are someone who produces software, at what point would you find it necessary to make use of one of these? When are there situations in which it would be unacceptable to make use of a device such as this?