Suppose you are in a contributory negligence state and you are the victim in an accident in which you are injured and you sustain $100,000 worth of damages in the form of medical bills and another $100,000 for loss of consortium. You sue the responsible party and a jury decides that you were 20% at fault and the defendant was 80% at fault. How much would you collect from the defendant in this state? A. $200,000 B. $160,000 C. $40,000 D. $0

Suppose you are in a contributory negligence state and you are the victim in an accident in which you are injured and you sustain $100,000 worth of damages in the form of medical bills and another $100,000 for loss of consortium. You sue the responsible party and a jury decides that you were 20% at fault and the defendant was 80% at fault. How much would you collect from the defendant in this state? A. $200,000 B. $160,000 C. $40,000 D. $0

SWFT Comprehensive Vol 2020

43rd Edition

ISBN:9780357391723

Author:Maloney

Publisher:Maloney

Chapter16: Accounting Periods And Methods

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 30P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In a certain civil case, plaintiff was awarded damages by the court in the sum of P20,000 representing profit he failed to realize on account of defendant’s failure to comply with his obligation to said plaintiff. Are those damages taxable against the plaintiff? a. No, because damages awarded are considered return of capital. b. No, because there is no sale transaction or exercise of profession in the awarding of damages. c. Yes, because the damages are not on account of injuries or sickness but for lost profit. d. Answer not given
Cool Ethan, an entrepreneur, was involved in an accident and was able to claim the following damages: Exemplary damages due to injuries - P70,000 Actual damages for unrealized profits - P120,000 Moral damages due to injuries - P80,000 Interest on non-taxable damages - P20,000 Attorney's fees - P100,000 Actual damages for lost products - P200,000 How much of the receipts is non-taxable?
Axel Brick Company has a lawsuit pending from a customer claiming $100,000 in damages. Axel's attorney advises the likelihood the customer will win the lawsuit is reasonably probable. GAAP requires at a minimum that this contingent liability be...
C has initiated a lawsuit against Agency A for recovery of damages when accidentally one of the vehicles owned by the agency collided with the car then driven by C. The Chief Legal Counsel of the Agency estimates from experience that at December 2015, the entity has a 60% chance of winning the lawsuit and thereby avoiding the payment of damages. Furthermore, the counsel estimates that the agency has 20% chance of being ordered to pay C damages of P100,000 and a 20% chance of being ordered to pay C damages of P10,000. . State whether a contingent liability or contingent asset exists. Explain your answers by stating the criteria of your answers below
C has initiated a lawsuit against Agency A for recovery of damages when accidentally one of the vehicles owned by the agency collided with the car then driven by C. The Chief Legal Counsel of the Agency estimates from experience that at December 2015, the entity has a 60% chance of winning the lawsuit and thereby avoiding the payment of damages. Furthermore, the counsel estimates that the agency has 20% chance of being ordered to pay C damages of P100,000 and a 20% chance of being ordered to pay C damages of P10,00 Use the facts given in No. 1, but this time assumes that on December 31, 2015, the Chief Legal Counsel of Agency A estimates from past experience that the possibility of losing the case filed by C is remote. -State whether a contingent liability or contingent asset exists.-Explain your answers by stating the criteria of your answers below.
Assume that auditors lost a civil lawsuit for damages and the court found total losses of $5million. If the auditors were determined to be 30 percent at fault and were the only solventdefendants, what is the auditors’ likely obligation under proportionate liability?a. $5,000,000.b. Zero.c. $2,250,000.d. $1,500,000.
In March year 2, an explosion occurred at Nilo Co.'s plant, causing damage to area properties. By May year 2, no claims had yet been asserted against Nilo. However, Nilo's management and legal counsel concluded that it was reasonably possible that Nilo would be held responsible for negligence, and that $3,000,000 would be a reasonable estimate of the damages. Nilo's $5,000,000 comprehensive public liability policy contains a $300,000 deductible clause. In Nilo's December 31, year 2 financial statements, for which the auditor's fieldwork was completed in April year 3, how should this casualty be reported? As a footnote disclosing a possible liability of $300,000. As a footnote disclosing a possible liability of $3,000,000. No footnote disclosure or accrual is required for year 3 because the event occurred in year 2. As an accrued liability of $300,000.
Ashley received a civil judgement against Sales Associate Betsy. The judge awarded Ashley $10,000 in compensatory damages and $8,000 in punitive damages. Court costs amounted to $3,000. Because Betsy had insufficient assets to satisfy the judgment, Ashley made a claim to the Recovery Fund, which was accepted. What is the maximum amount that the Recovery Fund reimburse Ashley?
Assume that $800,000 in damages are awarded to a plaintiff, and the CPA's percentage of responsibility established at 20%, while others are responsible foor the other 80%. Assume the others have no financial resources. The CPA has been required to pay $160,000. The auditor's liability is most likely based upon which approach t assesssing liability?
Patricia is being sued for $3 million as a result of an automobile accident where she was deemed 50 percent at-fault. At the time of the loss, Patricia had an automobile policy with Globex Insurance Company and helf a liability limit of $2 million. She also had an Umbrella Policy with Eiffel Insurance Company with a $2 million Limit. If the claimant is awarded $3 million, how is the claim payment structured? A) Globex Insurance covers $2 million and Eiffel Insurance covers the remaining $1 million. B) Clobex Insurance covers $1 million and Eiffel Insurance covers the remaining $2 million. C) Globex Insurance covers $2 million and Patricia pays the remaining $1 million. D) Globex Insurance covers $1.5 million as Patricia was deemed 50 preent at fault.
In 2015, plaintiff was injured by medical malpractice and received a jury verdict of $500,000 ($200,000 for medical care costs, $200,000 for lost income, and $100,000 for pain and suffering). All the medical care costs had been paid by plaintiff's health insurance company, but the submission of such evidence was barred at trial. In 1989, this jurisdiction, in response to a perceived crisis in medical malpractice insurance, abolished the collateral source rule. In post-trial motions in the instant case, the Court should: Reduce the judgment to $300,000. Reduce the judgment to $250,000. Reduce the judgment to $50,000 Not reduce the judgment
Winny, who is in the 25% marginal tax bracket, was injured in an automobile accident. She has threatened to file a suit against the other party involved in the accident and has proposed the following settlement: Damages for 25% loss of the use of her right arm $300,000 Medical expenses 50,000 Loss of Wages 10,000 Punitive damages 100,000 $460,000 The defendant’s insurance company is reluctant to pay punitive damages. Also, the company disputes the amount of her loss of wages. Instead, the company offers to pay her $400,000 for damages to her arm and $40,000 medical expenses. Would you recommend that Winny accept the offer? Explain why or why…