The core difference between the rational entity impairment model (IFRS) and the cost recovery impairment model (ASPE) is that       the IFRS approach waits until circumstances indicate that conditions are very bad before recognizing an impairment.   the IFRS approach captures only declines in value, with no later recognition of any recovery.   there are many differences; all of the above are true of the IFRS approach as compared to ASPE.   the IFRS approach better reflects the economic circumstances underlying the asset’s usefulness to the entity.

Managerial Accounting
15th Edition
ISBN:9781337912020
Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Chapter10: Evaluating Decentralized Operations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 12E
icon
Related questions
Question
The core difference between the rational entity impairment model (IFRS) and the cost recovery impairment model (ASPE) is that

 

 

 

the IFRS approach waits until circumstances indicate that conditions are very bad before recognizing an impairment.

 

the IFRS approach captures only declines in value, with no later recognition of any recovery.

 

there are many differences; all of the above are true of the IFRS approach as compared to ASPE.

 

the IFRS approach better reflects the economic circumstances underlying the asset’s usefulness to the entity.
Practice Question 12
The core difference between the rational entity impairment model (IFRS) and the cost recovery impairment model (ASPE) is that
the IFRS approach waits until circumstances indicate that conditions are very bad before recognizing an impairment.
the IFRS approach captures only declines in value, with no later recognition of any recovery.
there are many differences; all of the above are true of the IFRS approach as compared to ASPE.
the IFRS approach better reflects the economic circumstances underlying the asset's usefulness to the entity.
Transcribed Image Text:Practice Question 12 The core difference between the rational entity impairment model (IFRS) and the cost recovery impairment model (ASPE) is that the IFRS approach waits until circumstances indicate that conditions are very bad before recognizing an impairment. the IFRS approach captures only declines in value, with no later recognition of any recovery. there are many differences; all of the above are true of the IFRS approach as compared to ASPE. the IFRS approach better reflects the economic circumstances underlying the asset's usefulness to the entity.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Accounting Quality
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Accounting
Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337912020
Author:
Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub