The Green family owns and operates Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a national arts and crafts chain with over 500 stores and 13,000 employees. The Green family has organized the business around the principles of the Christian faith and has explicitly expressed the desire to run the company according to Biblical precepts, one of which is the belief that the use of contraception is immoral. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, employment- based group health care plans must provide certain types of preventative care, such as FDA approved contraceptive methods. While there are exemptions available for religious employers and non-profit religious institutions, there are no exemptions available for for-profit institutions such as Hobby Lobby Stores. The Greens sued Sebelius, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and challenged he contraception requirement. In 2014, the Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 decision that because the contraception requirement forces religious corporations to fund what they consider abortion, which goes against their stated religious principles- or face significant fines, creates a substantial burden that is not the least restrictive method of satisfying the government's interests. A. Identify a similarity between Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores and Yoder v. Wisconsin. 0 Oxplain why the facts of the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby

The Green family owns and operates Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a national arts and crafts chain with over 500 stores and 13,000 employees. The Green family has organized the business around the principles of the Christian faith and has explicitly expressed the desire to run the company according to Biblical precepts, one of which is the belief that the use of contraception is immoral. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, employment- based group health care plans must provide certain types of preventative care, such as FDA approved contraceptive methods. While there are exemptions available for religious employers and non-profit religious institutions, there are no exemptions available for for-profit institutions such as Hobby Lobby Stores. The Greens sued Sebelius, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and challenged he contraception requirement. In 2014, the Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 decision that because the contraception requirement forces religious corporations to fund what they consider abortion, which goes against their stated religious principles- or face significant fines, creates a substantial burden that is not the least restrictive method of satisfying the government's interests. A. Identify a similarity between Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores and Yoder v. Wisconsin. 0 Oxplain why the facts of the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby