The sentence ∀x∃y∃z(x=z+z) looks a bit peculiar because of the quantification of the vari- able y, which does not appear within the scope of the quanti- fier. (The same peculiarity appears in part (c) of this problem.) Nonetheless, the sentence is perfectly legal. If we interpret it in natural numbers, is it true? How would you write an equivalent formula without using the quantifier y?

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
13th Edition
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Swokowski
Chapter1: Fundamental Concepts Of Algebra
Section1.2: Exponents And Radicals
Problem 90E
icon
Related questions
Question

The sentence
∀x∃y∃z(x=z+z)
looks a bit peculiar because of the quantification of the vari-
able y, which does not appear within the scope of the quanti-
fier. (The same peculiarity appears in part (c) of this problem.)
Nonetheless, the sentence is perfectly legal. If we interpret it
in natural numbers, is it true? How would you write an
equivalent formula without using the quantifier y?

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
Geometry
ISBN:
9781337614085
Author:
Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,