The sequencing of assembly language instructions may be designed into compilers and assemblers to expose pipelines to the least amount of danger. This is one of the goals of pipeline design. Do all assemblers and compilers reorder assembly language instructions in the same way in order to maximise productivity?

The sequencing of assembly language instructions may be designed into compilers and assemblers to expose pipelines to the least amount of danger. This is one of the goals of pipeline design. Do all assemblers and compilers reorder assembly language instructions in the same way in order to maximise productivity?

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter4: Processor Technology And Architecture

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2PE: If a microprocessor has a cycle time of 0.5 nanoseconds, what’s the processor clock rate? If the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If a microprocessor has a cycle time of 0.5 nanoseconds, what’s the processor clock rate? If the fetch cycle is 40% of the processor cycle time, what memory access speed is required to implement load operations with zero wait states and load operations with two wait states?
How does pipelining improve CPU efficiency? What’s the potential effect on pipelining’s efficiency when executing a conditional BRANCH instruction? What techniques can be used to make pipelining more efficient when executing conditional BRANCH instructions?
It is feasible to create compilers and assemblers that optimize the reordering of assembly language instructions in order to minimize pipeline risks. When reordering assembly language instructions, do all compilers and assemblers use the same optimization techniques?
Writing compilers and assemblers that rearrange assembly language instructions to minimize pipeline hazards is a way to optimize them. When reordering assembly language instructions, do all assemblers and compilers perform the same optimizations?
It is feasible for compilers and assemblers to be built to sequence assembly language instructions in a pipeline in a way that poses the fewest dangers. To achieve optimal efficiency, do all assemblers and compilers rearrange assembly language instructions in the same way?
Compilers and assemblers have the ability to reorder assembler instructions in order to avoid pipeline dangers to the fullest degree that is practically possible. How similar or how unlike are the approaches used by assemblers and compilers when reordering instructions in assembly language?
The order in which assembly language instructions are executed may be programmed into compilers and assemblers so that pipelines are put in the most risk-free position possible. Pipeline design should aim to achieve this as one of its aims. In order to achieve the highest possible level of productivity, do all assemblers and compilers sequence the instructions for assembly language in the same fashion?
It's possible to write compilers and assemblers that rearrange assembly language instructions such that a pipeline has as few dangers as possible. Do all assemblers and compilers rearrange assembly language instructions in the same manner to achieve maximum efficiency?
Compilers and assemblers may be designed to sequence assembly language instructions in such a manner that a pipeline has the fewest potential dangers. Do all assemblers and compilers rearrange assembly language instructions in the same manner to achieve maximum efficiency?
Assembly language instructions may be optimized by writing compilers and assemblers that rearrange them to have the fewest possible pipeline risks. Do all assemblers and compilers optimize the same manner when rearranging assembly language instructions?
It is feasible to set up a compiler for assembly language and an assembler in such a way that a pipeline is exposed to the least amount of danger imaginable. One of the goals of pipeline design is to do this. To reach the highest possible level of productivity, do all assemblers and compilers rearrange the instructions that are delivered in assembly language in the same way?
Compilers and assemblers can be programmed to sequence assembly language instructions in a way that poses the least risk to a system's pipelines. In fact, achieving this is a primary focus when planning a pipeline. Is it true that all assemblers and compilers rearrange the order of assembly language instructions in the same way?