This is a long answer question - to be answered in plain English without any code and under 200 words or less. Please follow the instructions for each part carefully. • List (in bullet points and preferably in the correct order) the basic/fundamental principles of Object Oriented Programming. Note - this means the principles as originally declared when OOP was proposed, not the expanded ones you find on the web that are derivative or already included in the basic principles. • Define each principle in plain English in no more than two sentences each. Do not use incomplete or cursory sentences - the definitions should clearly explain the corresponding principle. • Use the example of a COLLEGE BOOKSTORE as ONE SINGLE UNIFIED example to clearly demonstrate how each principle is/will be applied in that example. DO NOT WRITE ANY CODE.

This is a long answer question - to be answered in plain English without any code and under 200 words or less. Please follow the instructions for each part carefully. • List (in bullet points and preferably in the correct order) the basic/fundamental principles of Object Oriented Programming. Note - this means the principles as originally declared when OOP was proposed, not the expanded ones you find on the web that are derivative or already included in the basic principles. • Define each principle in plain English in no more than two sentences each. Do not use incomplete or cursory sentences - the definitions should clearly explain the corresponding principle. • Use the example of a COLLEGE BOOKSTORE as ONE SINGLE UNIFIED example to clearly demonstrate how each principle is/will be applied in that example. DO NOT WRITE ANY CODE.

Programming Logic & Design Comprehensive

9th Edition

ISBN:9781337669405

Author:FARRELL

Publisher:FARRELL

Chapter2: Elements Of High-quality Programs

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Why don't we investigate the many approaches of programming that are at our disposal? The second thing that immediately comes to me is why there are so many different paradigms to choose from. Do you absolutely need them? I'd appreciate it if you could describe it using your own words.
Can a database of programming paradigms be created? Having so many diverse paradigms seems silly. If you don't have them, you can't utilize them. Please clarify your meaning for what you just stated.
Can we get a rundown of the various programming tenets? So, why are there so many alternative theoretical frameworks? Do we really need them? Please explain it to me in your own terms.
Let's examine a few of the many programming paradigms. So why are there so many different paradigms? What purpose do they serve? Give it your own unique description.
Imagine you have a record of the various programming paradigms. As in, how many different paradigms can we get by with? Do we really need them? Explore this in great detail, using your own words to support up your claims.
Is it possible to compile a database of programming paradigms? It seems foolish to have so many different paradigms. You can't use them if you don't have them. Let me know what you mean by what you've just said.
What if you wrote down the programming paradigms? For how many paradigms do we really need? Is it truly necessary to have them? Discuss in depth, constructing your own words to back up your points.
Can you describe the various programming paradigms? So, why are there so many alternative theoretical frameworks? What is the utmost importance of having them? Think about it from your own angle, then explain it to us in your own words.
Could you please explain the many paradigms used in computer programming? So then, why are there so many other theoretical frameworks? In what ways are they indispensable? Have a conversation about it using your own words and point of view.
Why don't we have a look at the many different programming methodologies that are now available to us? The issue that must then be asked is, what factors contribute to the existence of a plethora of distinct paradigms? Do you have no choice but to have them? I would appreciate it if you could explain it using your own words.
Why don't we investigate the many approaches of programming that are at our disposal? The question that has to be answered then is why there are so many different paradigms. Are they unquestionably need to be used? When you describe it, I would appreciate it if you used your own words.
Can we get a rundown of the various programming tenets? Whence therefore the plethora of theoretical frameworks? Do we really need them? Just tell me what you think it is.