Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
To what extent was the Reagan Doctrine similar to the Eisenhower Doctrine? Read the summary and excerpt below, and then address this prompt by comparing and contrasting eras, goals, and impact of each doctrine. Write in complete sentences. Eisenhower Doctrine President Dwight Eisenhower presented his Doctrine on January 5, 1957. He promised military or economic aid to any Middle Eastem country needing help in resisting communist aggression. The doctrine was intended to check increased Soviet influence in the Middle East, which had resulted from the supply of arms to Egypt by communist countries British attack on Egypt in October 1956. Eisenhower proclaimed, with the approval of Congress, that he would use the armed forces to protect the independence of any Middle Eastern country seeking American help. The Eisenhower Doctrine represented no radical change in U.S. policy, the Truman Doctrine had pledged similar support to Greece and Turkey 10 years earlier. It was a continuation of the U.S. policy of containment of or resistance to any extension of the Soviet sphere of influence. (souroe: Encydopeda Britannica) s well as from strong communist support of Arab states against an Israeli, French, and

To what extent was the Reagan Doctrine similar to the Eisenhower Doctrine? Read the summary and excerpt below, and then address this prompt by comparing and contrasting eras, goals, and impact of each doctrine. Write in complete sentences. Eisenhower Doctrine President Dwight Eisenhower presented his Doctrine on January 5, 1957. He promised military or economic aid to any Middle Eastem country needing help in resisting communist aggression. The doctrine was intended to check increased Soviet influence in the Middle East, which had resulted from the supply of arms to Egypt by communist countries British attack on Egypt in October 1956. Eisenhower proclaimed, with the approval of Congress, that he would use the armed forces to protect the independence of any Middle Eastern country seeking American help. The Eisenhower Doctrine represented no radical change in U.S. policy, the Truman Doctrine had pledged similar support to Greece and Turkey 10 years earlier. It was a continuation of the U.S. policy of containment of or resistance to any extension of the Soviet sphere of influence. (souroe: Encydopeda Britannica) s well as from strong communist support of Arab states against an Israeli, French, and

icon
Related questions
Question
To what extent was the Reagan Doctrine similar to the Eisenhower Doctrine? Read the summary and excerpt below, and then address this prompt by comparing and contrasting eras, goals, and impact of each doctrine. Write in complete sentences. Eisenhower Doctrine President Dwight Eisenhower presented his Doctrine on January 5, 1957. He promised military or economic aid to any Middle Eastem country needing help in resisting communist aggression. The doctrine was intended to check increased Soviet influence in the Middle East, which had resulted from the supply of ams to Egypt by communist countries as well as from strong communist support of Arab states against an Israeli, French, and British attack on Egypt in October 1956. Eisenhower proclaimed, with the approval of Congress, that he would use the armed forces to protect the independence of any Middle Eastern country seeking American help. The Eisenhower Doctrine represented no radical change in U.S. policy; the Truman Doctrine had pledged similar support to Greece and Turkey 10 years earlier. It was a continuation of the U.S. policy of containment of or resistance to any extension of the Soviet sphere of influence. (source: Encyclopedia Britannica) Excerpts from The Eisenhower Doctrine on the Middle East. A Message to Congress. January 5, 1957 The Middle East has abruptly reached a new and critical stage in its long and important history...Our country supports without reservation the full sovereignty and independence of each and every nation of the Middle East.(J)ust recently there have been hostilities involving Western European nations that once exercised much influence in the area. Also the relatively large attack by Israel in October has intensified the basic differences between (Israel) and its Arab neighbors. All this instability has been heightened and, at times, manipulated by International Communism. Russia's rulers have long sought to dominate the Middle East. That was true of the Czars and it is true of the Bolsheviks. The Soviet Union has nothing whatsoever to fear from the United States in the Middle East, or anywhere else in the world, so long as its rulers do not themselves first resort to aggression. The reason for Russia's interest in the Middle East is solely that of power politics. Considering her announced purpose of communizing the world, it is easy to understand her hope of dominating the Middle East.... Thus, we have these simple and indisputable facts: 1. The Middle East, which has always been coveted by Russia, would today be prized more than ever by Intemational Communism. 2. The Soviet rulers continue to show that they do not scruple to use any incants to gain their ends. 3. The free nations of the Mid East need, and for the most part want, added strength to assure their continued independence. .. Our desire is a world environment of freedom, not servitude..The action which I propose would have the following features. It would, first of all, authorize the United States to cooperate with and assist any nation or group of nations in the general area of the Middle East in the development of economic strength dedicated to the maintenance of national independence. It would, in the second place, authorize the Executive to undertake ... programs of military assistance and cooperation with any nation or group of nations which desires such aid. It would, in the third place, authorize such assistance and cooperation to include the employment of the armed forces of the United States to secure and protect the territorial integrity and political independence of such nations, requesting such aid, against overt armed aggression from any nation controlled by International Communism. .The proposed legislation is primarily designed to deal with the possibility of Communist aggression, direct and indirect. Experience shows that indirect aggression rarely if ever succeeds where there is reasonable security against direct aggression; where the government possesses loyal security forces, and where economic conditions are such as not to make Communism seem an attractive alternative. The program I suggest deals with all three aspects of this matter . And as I have indicated, it will also be necessary for us to contribute economically to strengthen those countries, or groups of countries.. Such measures will provide the greatest insurance against Communist inroads. Words alone are not enough. (source: Avalan.law.yale.edu)
Transcribed Image Text:To what extent was the Reagan Doctrine similar to the Eisenhower Doctrine? Read the summary and excerpt below, and then address this prompt by comparing and contrasting eras, goals, and impact of each doctrine. Write in complete sentences. Eisenhower Doctrine President Dwight Eisenhower presented his Doctrine on January 5, 1957. He promised military or economic aid to any Middle Eastem country needing help in resisting communist aggression. The doctrine was intended to check increased Soviet influence in the Middle East, which had resulted from the supply of ams to Egypt by communist countries as well as from strong communist support of Arab states against an Israeli, French, and British attack on Egypt in October 1956. Eisenhower proclaimed, with the approval of Congress, that he would use the armed forces to protect the independence of any Middle Eastern country seeking American help. The Eisenhower Doctrine represented no radical change in U.S. policy; the Truman Doctrine had pledged similar support to Greece and Turkey 10 years earlier. It was a continuation of the U.S. policy of containment of or resistance to any extension of the Soviet sphere of influence. (source: Encyclopedia Britannica) Excerpts from The Eisenhower Doctrine on the Middle East. A Message to Congress. January 5, 1957 The Middle East has abruptly reached a new and critical stage in its long and important history...Our country supports without reservation the full sovereignty and independence of each and every nation of the Middle East.(J)ust recently there have been hostilities involving Western European nations that once exercised much influence in the area. Also the relatively large attack by Israel in October has intensified the basic differences between (Israel) and its Arab neighbors. All this instability has been heightened and, at times, manipulated by International Communism. Russia's rulers have long sought to dominate the Middle East. That was true of the Czars and it is true of the Bolsheviks. The Soviet Union has nothing whatsoever to fear from the United States in the Middle East, or anywhere else in the world, so long as its rulers do not themselves first resort to aggression. The reason for Russia's interest in the Middle East is solely that of power politics. Considering her announced purpose of communizing the world, it is easy to understand her hope of dominating the Middle East.... Thus, we have these simple and indisputable facts: 1. The Middle East, which has always been coveted by Russia, would today be prized more than ever by Intemational Communism. 2. The Soviet rulers continue to show that they do not scruple to use any incants to gain their ends. 3. The free nations of the Mid East need, and for the most part want, added strength to assure their continued independence. .. Our desire is a world environment of freedom, not servitude..The action which I propose would have the following features. It would, first of all, authorize the United States to cooperate with and assist any nation or group of nations in the general area of the Middle East in the development of economic strength dedicated to the maintenance of national independence. It would, in the second place, authorize the Executive to undertake ... programs of military assistance and cooperation with any nation or group of nations which desires such aid. It would, in the third place, authorize such assistance and cooperation to include the employment of the armed forces of the United States to secure and protect the territorial integrity and political independence of such nations, requesting such aid, against overt armed aggression from any nation controlled by International Communism. .The proposed legislation is primarily designed to deal with the possibility of Communist aggression, direct and indirect. Experience shows that indirect aggression rarely if ever succeeds where there is reasonable security against direct aggression; where the government possesses loyal security forces, and where economic conditions are such as not to make Communism seem an attractive alternative. The program I suggest deals with all three aspects of this matter . And as I have indicated, it will also be necessary for us to contribute economically to strengthen those countries, or groups of countries.. Such measures will provide the greatest insurance against Communist inroads. Words alone are not enough. (source: Avalan.law.yale.edu)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer