ux developers decided to construct a non-preemptive kernel is unclear. In a system with a single processor, what is the advantage of a non-preemptible kernel? Alternatively, why does a multiprocessor system lose this ben

ux developers decided to construct a non-preemptive kernel is unclear. In a system with a single processor, what is the advantage of a non-preemptible kernel? Alternatively, why does a multiprocessor system lose this ben

Name: Why the original Linux developers decided to construct a non-preemptiv
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:51:23.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Why the original Linux developers decided to construct a non-preemptive kernel is unclear.In a system with a single processor, what is the advantage of a non-preemptible kernel? Alternatively, why does a multiprocessor system lose this benefit?

Fundamentals of Information Systems

9th Edition

ISBN:9781337097536

Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Publisher:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Chapter2: Hardware And Software

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9SAT

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Why did the original Linux developers chose a non-preemptible kernel?In a system with a single processor, what is the advantage of a non-preemptible kernel? Yet, why is the advantage diminished in a multiprocessor system?
Why did the first Linux developers choose to build a non-preemptible kernel?How does a non-preemptible kernel benefit a single-processor system? In contrast, why is the benefit lessened in a multiprocessor system?
It's unclear why the original Linux developers chose to create a non-preemptive kernel.What is the advantage of a non-preemptible kernel in a single-processor system? But, why does a multiprocessor system lose this advantage?
Why did Linux developers choose non-preemptible kernels?What does a single-processor non-preemptible kernel do? Why do multiprocessor systems lose benefit?
Why did the first Linux developers choose to implement a non-preemptible kernel?What advantage does a non-preemptible kernel have in a single processor system? Why, on the other hand, is the advantage reduced in a multi-processor system?
Why did the developers of Linux decide to make the operating system's kernel non-preemptible?Why would you choose to use a non-preemptible kernel for a system with just one processor? Why do less advantages result from the use of a multiprocessor system?
What motivated Linux's early creators to settle with a kernel that did not enable preemptive multitasking?When working with a single CPU, what are the benefits of a non-preemptible kernel? Why, however, would employing a system with several CPUs reduce the benefit?
Why did the Linux founders construct a non-preemptible kernel?How does a non-preemptible kernel improve a single-processor system? Why does a multi-processor system diminish benefit?
To what end did the first Linux developers choose to build a non-preemptible kernel?Where does a non-preemptible kernel's advantage lie in a single-processor system? However, why does the advantage diminish when using several processors in a single system?
Why did the original Linux creators choose for a non-preemptible kernel?What is a non-preemptible kernel's advantage in a single processor system? Why, therefore, does the advantage diminish in a multi-processor system?
Why did the original Linux developers choose to construct a non-preemptible kernel?What is the advantage of a non-preemptible kernel in a single-processor system? Why, on the other hand, is the advantage diminished in a multi-processor system?
Why did the original developers of Linux chose a kernel that did not support preemptive multitasking?What are the advantages of using a non-preemptible kernel in a system that only has one processor? However, why is the value diminished when using a machine with several processors?