When TCP sends a (SYN, SequenceNum = x), the consequent ACK has Acknowledgment = x + 1; that is, SYNs and FINs each take up one unit in sequence number space. Is this necessary? If so, give an example of an ambiguity that would arise if the corresponding Acknowledgment were x instead of x + 1; if not, explain why. SequenceNum = x) or (FIN,

When TCP sends a (SYN, SequenceNum = x), the consequent ACK has Acknowledgment = x + 1; that is, SYNs and FINs each take up one unit in sequence number space. Is this necessary? If so, give an example of an ambiguity that would arise if the corresponding Acknowledgment were x instead of x + 1; if not, explain why. SequenceNum = x) or (FIN,

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

For the Zhou-Gollman non-repudiation protocol discussed in the lecture on “Non-Repudiationand Anonymity Protocols”, which one of the following statements is false:a) At time point 4, both A and B can produce evidence to prove that they received Kb) At time point 2, both A and B can produce evidence to prove that they received a signedmessage from the other partyc) At time point 0, S cannot prove anythingd) At time point 3, B cannot produce evidence to prove that A has access to key Ke) At time point 1, A can prove that B is alivef) At time point 4, S can prove that A is aliveg) At time point 3, S can produce evidence that that A has access to key Kh) At time point 0, A is not alivei) At time point 2, A can produce evidence to prove that B is alivej) At time point 4, the protocol terminates
In an RPC-like protocol in which multiple requests can be outstanding, and replies can be sent in any order: Assume that requests are numbered and that ACK[N] acknowledges reply[N]. Should ACKs be cumulative? If not, what should happen if an ACK is lost?
Is that so, or not? Consider a TCP connection where the most recent SampleRTT was 1 second. It is recommended that the TimeoutInterval be set to more than one second.
For the Zhou-Gollman non-repudiation protocol discussed in the lecture on “Non-Repudiationand Anonymity Protocols”, which one of the following statements is false:
We use DES in cipher feedback mode (CFB) to encrypt a plaintext m = m1m2 ...m100 into a ciphertext c1c2 ...c100, where each mi is 8-bit long. The ciphertext is sent to Bob. If c15 and c25 are missing and c8 and c88 are received as c8' and c88' wrongly, what mi’s can B compute correctly from the received ciphertext?
Msg3. B→A : B, N1, Ks, Message2, h(B, N1, Message2) Whereas: h(m) represents the digest of the message (m). {m}{K} represents the encryption of message (m) using the key (K) PK is public key N1 is a random number. 1. What are the main problems in Msg3?
I need The Answer Pure Aloha in Multiple Access Protocols should be described in three to four lines, without plagiarizing.
Is this statement true or false? Let's say for the sake of simplicity that a TCP connection's most recent SampleRTT is one second. The connection must be kept open if the current TimeoutInterval value is larger than one second.
This a TCP question with 5 parts, using the context given in questions 11 and 12 only answer and show work for other three parts (13-15)
Consider the Go-Back-N and selective-repeat protocols, suppose the sequence number space is of size k. What is the largest allowable sender window that will avoid the occurrence of problems for each of these protocols?
In TCP Fast Retransmit, if we receive three duplicate ACKS after sending out a packet that is not incrementally ACK-ed but before the time-out associated with that packet, we immediately retransmit the packet without waiting for the timeout to occur. Why do we wait for three duplicates instead of just one?
Is this the right answer or the wrong answer? Assume that the most recent SampleRTT for a TCP connection is one second. The TimeoutInterval setting for the connection must now be set to a value that is greater than one second.