Which of the following MOST likely indicates a clear violation of an NFPO’s code of conduct? John Adams, a volunteer for the local pet shelter, also owns a pet store and has offered a discount on pet food to the local shelter. Cecilia Lam used inappropriate language on her Facebook page when referring to the NFPO for which she worked. Mark Adams, an employee for a legal society, used the organization’s computer to research a new job. Hanpreet Kaur, the accountant for a sports rehabilitation society, offered the society’s services to his sister free of charge without her needing to qualify.

Which of the following MOST likely indicates a clear violation of an NFPO’s code of conduct? John Adams, a volunteer for the local pet shelter, also owns a pet store and has offered a discount on pet food to the local shelter. Cecilia Lam used inappropriate language on her Facebook page when referring to the NFPO for which she worked. Mark Adams, an employee for a legal society, used the organization’s computer to research a new job. Hanpreet Kaur, the accountant for a sports rehabilitation society, offered the society’s services to his sister free of charge without her needing to qualify.

Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305224414

Author:JENNINGS

Publisher:JENNINGS

Chapter2: Business Ethics And Social Responsibility

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Able, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed a suspect involved in an environmental crime. The suspect, Blake, admitted to purposely polluting the environment. Blake’s action eventually caused almost thirty people to develop serious environmentally related illness. Upon hearing this fact from Blake, Able should: A. Scold Blake for his conduct. B. Make no comment whatever. C. Treat Blake with decency and respect. D. Ask Blake to apologize to the victims.
Nadine visits Urban Air, a trampoline park. Before Nadine can enter the trampoline park, Urban Air requires her to sign a release stating that Urban Air will not be held responsible for any injury of any kind that Nadine incurs while on Urban Air property, no matter what the cause of the injury is. While Nadine is jumping on a trampoline, her boyfriend Trevor joins her. Trevor’s ex-girlfriend Valarie, who is an Urban Air employee, becomes enraged and pushes Nadine off the trampoline. Nadine breaks an arm in the incident. Who can Nadine sue for her injuries? a) Urban Air only b) Nadine cannot sue anyone because she signed a release of liability form. c) Valarie and Urban Air Select correct answer
Which of the following people would not be considered an “Other Member” (OM) for Code of ProfessionalConduct purposes? Group of answer choices a. Tim, who has his CPA license, but is currently unemployed and traveling around the country living off his savings. b. Bolt, who has his CPA license, but is trying out retirement to see if it suits him. c. Margot, who has her CPA license, but is unemployed as she is devoting most of her time topursuing a sexual harassment lawsuit against her previous firm. d. Ananya, who has her CPA license and is an internal auditor for Frisbye Corporation.
Linda Malloy is a CPA with a passion for animals and volunteers 15 hours a week at an animal shelter. While she was originally asked to provide pro bono auditing help, these days she only provides hands-on care for abandoned and rescued puppies. One Saturday the shelter's director tells Linda that the puppies seem very agitated, and adds, "It's almost like they know what dire financial straits we are in right now and they are worried about landing back on the streets again." Linda senses an opportunity, and calls a friend she thinks might be interested in purchasing the shelter. She tells her friend, "I bet you can get the place for well under market value, since the owner is really stressed and needs to sell quickly." Which of the following statements is true? Select one: As a CPA, Linda is not permitted to provide volunteer or pro bono services, so has made a per se violation of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. Regardless of the physical labor she is providing at the…
Please describe a time when you were faced with a personal dilemma regarding whether to blow the whistle on a wrongdoing. Some examples of a wrongdoing are witnessing cheating on an exam, witnessing someone trying to steal, noticing someone trying to take advantage of another, and completing a project at work without recording time spent in order to meet time constraints. Who were the stakeholders in the situation and how were they impacted by the wrongdoing? How did rationalization encourage the wrongdoer to follow through with their wrongdoing? What did you do and why?
Please describe a time when you were faced with a personal dilemma regarding whether to blow the whistle on a wrongdoing. Some examples of a wrongdoing are witnessing cheating on an exam, witnessing someone trying to steal, noticing someone trying to take advantage of another, and completing a project at work without recording time spent in order to meet time constraints. Who were the stakeholders in the situation and how were they impacted by the wrongdoing? How did rationalization encourage the wrongdoer to follow through with their wrongdoing? What did you do and why? Case scenario: for someone working but not clocking in How would this fit under this dilemma? Please explain:
Hunn injured herself when she slipped and fell on a loose plank while walking down some steps. The night before, while entering the hotel, she had noticed that the steps were dangerous, and although she knew from her earlier stays at the hotel that another exit was available, she chose that morning to leave via the dangerous steps. The hotel was aware of the hazard, as one of the other guests who had fallen that night had reported his accident to the desk clerk then on duty. Still, the hotel did not place cautionary signs on the steps to warn of the danger, and they were not roped off or otherwise excluded from use. Hunn brought an action against the hotel for injuries she sustained as a result of her fall. Should she recover? Explain.
Other Responsibilities and Practices Cases. Read the following cases. For each, statewhether the action or situation shows a violation or potential for violation of the AICPACode of Professional Conduct; if so, explain why, and cite the relevant rule.a. CPA Ron Stout completed a review of the unaudited financial statements of Wolfe Gifts.Arvida Wolfe was very displeased with the report. An argument ensued, and she toldStout never to darken her door again. Two days later, she telephoned Stout and demandedthat he return (1) Wolfe’s cash disbursement journal, (2) Stout’s documentation scheduleof adjusting journal entries, (3) Stout’s inventory analysis documentation, and (4) allother documentation prepared by Stout. Wolfe had not yet paid her bill, so Stout repliedthat state law gave him a lien on all of the records and he would return them as soon asshe paid his fee.b. CPA O’Dell May teaches a CPA review course at the university. He needs problem andquestion material for students’…