Which statement is true about the result considering a significance level of 5%? o The result is not statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does increase the growth rate. O The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does not increase the growth rate. * The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does increase the growth rate. O The result is not statistically significant, which implies that this result could be due to random chance.

Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
4th Edition
ISBN:9781305071742
Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Chapter14: Counting And Probability
Section14.CR: Chapter Review
Problem 5CC: a What is meant by an experiment? Sample space? b What is an event? c Define the probability of an...
icon
Related questions
Question
Which statement is true about the result considering a significance level of 5%?
TSA Sims 4 Male Hairsty..
Course Hero
C Unit Activity Answe...
QuillBot Al
Course Activity: Treatments and Significance
12 of 19
E Save & E
Determine the probability of the treatment group's mean being greater than the control group's mean by 8 points or
more. Then complete the statements.
- the
The significance level is set at 5%, and the probability of the result is 3.6
significance level. The result is statistically significant
* %. which is less than
Part B
Question
Which statement is true about the result considering a significance level of 5%?
o The result is not statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer
does increase the growth rate.
O The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does
not increase the growth rate.
* The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does
increase the growth rate.
o The result is not statistically significant, which implies that this result could be due to random chance.
Question 2
According to a research study, people can better manage their time when they wear watches than when they use mobile
phones or other gadgets to keep track of time.
To test the study's results, researchers randomized 300 college students into a treatment group and a control group. The
treatment group was asked to wear a watch every day, and the control group was asked to avoid wearing a watch for 50 days.
Researchers noted the number of occasions when students from both groups arrived later than their scheduled time.
The results of the experiment showed that the mean score of the treatment group was exactly 15 points less than the mean
score of the control group. To test whether the results could be explained by random chance, the researchers created the
following table, which summarizes the results of 1,000 randomizations of the data with differences of means rounded to the
nearest 5 points.
Considen the sgnificance level to be set at 5%, so results lower than 5% can be considered statistically significant.
Treahmet nin an nntni firun ioun
Fraanu
Transcribed Image Text:TSA Sims 4 Male Hairsty.. Course Hero C Unit Activity Answe... QuillBot Al Course Activity: Treatments and Significance 12 of 19 E Save & E Determine the probability of the treatment group's mean being greater than the control group's mean by 8 points or more. Then complete the statements. - the The significance level is set at 5%, and the probability of the result is 3.6 significance level. The result is statistically significant * %. which is less than Part B Question Which statement is true about the result considering a significance level of 5%? o The result is not statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does increase the growth rate. O The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does not increase the growth rate. * The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does increase the growth rate. o The result is not statistically significant, which implies that this result could be due to random chance. Question 2 According to a research study, people can better manage their time when they wear watches than when they use mobile phones or other gadgets to keep track of time. To test the study's results, researchers randomized 300 college students into a treatment group and a control group. The treatment group was asked to wear a watch every day, and the control group was asked to avoid wearing a watch for 50 days. Researchers noted the number of occasions when students from both groups arrived later than their scheduled time. The results of the experiment showed that the mean score of the treatment group was exactly 15 points less than the mean score of the control group. To test whether the results could be explained by random chance, the researchers created the following table, which summarizes the results of 1,000 randomizations of the data with differences of means rounded to the nearest 5 points. Considen the sgnificance level to be set at 5%, so results lower than 5% can be considered statistically significant. Treahmet nin an nntni firun ioun Fraanu
Course Activity: Treatments and Significance
12 of 19
E Save & Ex
Task 2
* Print
Applying a Level of Significance
In this task, you'll study the data from two experiments. For each data set, you will determine whether the difference of means
between the treatment group and the control group is statistically significant and interpret the result in the context of the
situation.
Question 1
Researchers want to find a way to increase the growth rate of corn so it can be harvested more often. To test the effectiveness
of a new type of spray fertilizer, plants grown from 200 corn seeds were divided equally into two groups: a treatment group
and a control group. The treatment group was frequently sprayed with the new type of fertilizer. The growth in centimeters of
each corn plant was noted before and after the treatment
The results showed that the mean change in the growth rate by the treatment group is 8 points more than that of the control
group. To test whether the results could be explained by random chance, researchers created a table that summarizes the
results of 1,000 re-randomizations of the data with differences of means rounded to the nearest 2 points.
Consider the significance level to be set at 5%, so results less than 5% can be considered statistically significant.
Treatment Group Mean - Control Group Mean
Frequency
-12
-10
10
28
58
-4
125
-2
184
201
186
114
57
26
10
12
Part A
2 Question
Determine the probability of the treatment group's mean being greater than the control group's mean by 8 points or
more. Then complete the statements.
Transcribed Image Text:Course Activity: Treatments and Significance 12 of 19 E Save & Ex Task 2 * Print Applying a Level of Significance In this task, you'll study the data from two experiments. For each data set, you will determine whether the difference of means between the treatment group and the control group is statistically significant and interpret the result in the context of the situation. Question 1 Researchers want to find a way to increase the growth rate of corn so it can be harvested more often. To test the effectiveness of a new type of spray fertilizer, plants grown from 200 corn seeds were divided equally into two groups: a treatment group and a control group. The treatment group was frequently sprayed with the new type of fertilizer. The growth in centimeters of each corn plant was noted before and after the treatment The results showed that the mean change in the growth rate by the treatment group is 8 points more than that of the control group. To test whether the results could be explained by random chance, researchers created a table that summarizes the results of 1,000 re-randomizations of the data with differences of means rounded to the nearest 2 points. Consider the significance level to be set at 5%, so results less than 5% can be considered statistically significant. Treatment Group Mean - Control Group Mean Frequency -12 -10 10 28 58 -4 125 -2 184 201 186 114 57 26 10 12 Part A 2 Question Determine the probability of the treatment group's mean being greater than the control group's mean by 8 points or more. Then complete the statements.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305071742
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305115545
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning