Why did the original Linux engineers design a kernel that does not enable preemptive processing? Why would you want to use a non-preemptible kernel in a computer system with a single CPU? Alternatively, why does the presence of several processors in a system diminish the significance of the benefit?

Why did the original Linux engineers design a kernel that does not enable preemptive processing? Why would you want to use a non-preemptible kernel in a computer system with a single CPU? Alternatively, why does the presence of several processors in a system diminish the significance of the benefit?

CompTIA Linux+ Guide to Linux Certification (MindTap Course List)

4th Edition

ISBN:9781305107168

Author:Jason Eckert

Publisher:Jason Eckert

Chapter1: Introduction To Linux

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Why did the original architects of Linux decide to create a kernel that does not support preemptive processing?In a computer system with just one CPU, why would you want to use a non-preemptible kernel? On the other hand, why does having several processors in a system make the benefit less significant?
Why did the original Linux creators choose for a non-preemptible kernel?What is a non-preemptible kernel's advantage in a single processor system? Why, therefore, does the advantage diminish in a multi-processor system?
Why did the original Linux developers choose to construct a non-preemptible kernel?What is the advantage of a non-preemptible kernel in a single-processor system? Why, on the other hand, is the advantage diminished in a multi-processor system?
Why did the original developers of Linux chose a kernel that did not support preemptive multitasking?What are the advantages of using a non-preemptible kernel in a system that only has one processor? However, why is the value diminished when using a machine with several processors?
When designing Linux, why did its creators choose to create a kernel that does not allow for preemptive processing?Using a non-preemptible kernel in a single-CPU system seems counterintuitive. To the contrary, why does increasing the number of processors in a system diminish the benefit?
Why did the Linux founders construct a non-preemptible kernel?How does a non-preemptible kernel improve a single-processor system? Why does a multi-processor system diminish benefit?
Why did the original Linux developers decide to use a non-preemptible kernel?What is the advantage of a non-preemptible kernel in a single processor system? But why is the advantage lessened in a multi-processor system?
It has never been made explicit why the creators of Linux chose to create a non-preemptive kernel.Just what advantage does a non-preemptible kernel provide in a single-processor system? Why, therefore, does using many processors result in less overall performance improvement?
Why did the original developers of Linux decide to go with a kernel that was not preemptible?What advantages does a non-preemptible kernel provide to a system with only one processor? Why, though, is the advantage diminished when working with several processors in a single system?