X sold his dog to Y on 01 May 2022 with the stipulation that X will deliver the same on 20 May 2022. It turns out that the dog is pregnant and will be having her labour on 19 May 2022, who owns the puppies? a. Y because the contract was already perfected on 01 May 2022 b. X because the dog already gave birth before the delivery c. Both of the parties d. None of the parties

X sold his dog to Y on 01 May 2022 with the stipulation that X will deliver the same on 20 May 2022. It turns out that the dog is pregnant and will be having her labour on 19 May 2022, who owns the puppies? a. Y because the contract was already perfected on 01 May 2022 b. X because the dog already gave birth before the delivery c. Both of the parties d. None of the parties

Administration Of Wills/Trusts/ And Estates

5th Edition

ISBN:9781285281308

Author:Brown

Publisher:Brown

Chapter7: Family Protection, Lapses, And Ademption

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3CTD

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Rowan promised to give his dog named "Max" to Alan to be delivered on February 14, 2022. Supposed on February 14, 2022, Rowan did not deliver Max to Alan and the latter also did not demand delivery of said dog. Is Rowan liable?
Mr. S sold a pig named Peachy to Ms. B for P5,000. No condition or period was contemplated. After the perfection of the contract but before the delivery of the pig, Peachy the pig gave birth to 5 piglets. Who is entitled to the 5 piglets?
The following are conditional obligations, except * Dante to pay Carlos P 1,000, if Carlos has the means. Dante to give Carlos P 1,000, if Carlos passes the examination. Dante to give Carlos a horse, if Carlos marries X. None of the above.
Marco decides to take $2,000 from the partnership for the repair and record it as an expense of the partnership. He believes that this is appropriate since he needs his car to get to work every day. Is Marco behaving ethically? Why or why not? Who is affected by Marco’s decision? What other alternatives might Marco consider?
John and Jill are a de facto couple who purchase a family home and a rental property in January 2018. They separate in August that year, with Jill getting the family home and John getting the rental property. John initially decides to keep the rental property as an investment, but later changes his mind when he finds it hard to pay the weekly outgoings on his own. John sells the rental property in January 2019. Is the sale subject to tax?
Alicia and Rafel are in the process of negotiating a divorce agreement to be finalized in 2019. They both worked during the marriage and contributed an equal amount to the marital assets. They own a home with a fair market value of 400,000 (cost of 300,000) that is subject to a mortgage of 250,000. They have lived in the home for 12 years. They also have investment assets with a cost of 160,000 and a fair market value of 410,000. Thus, the net worth of the couple is 560,000 (400,000 250,000 + 410,000). The holding period for the investments is longer than one year. Alicia would like to continue to live in the house. Therefore, she has proposed that she receive the residence subject to the mortgage, a net value of 150,000. In addition, she would receive 17,600 each year for the next 10 years, which has a present value (at 6% interest) of 130,000. Rafel would receive the investment assets. If Rafel accepts this plan, he must sell one-half of the investments so that he can purchase a home. Assume that you are counseling Alicia. Explain to Alicia whether the proposed agreement would be fair on an after-tax basis.
Fred and Wilma were divorced in year 1 (before 2019). Fred is required to pay Wilma 12,000 of alimony each year until their child turns 18. At that time, the payment will be reduced to 10,000 per year. In year 3, in accordance with the divorce agreement, Fred paid 6,000 directly to Wilma and 6,000 directly to the law school Wilma is attending. What amount of the payments received in year 3 is income to Wilma? a. 6,000 b. 10,000 c. 12,000 d. 0
Katie and Rob were married in 2010. Katie and Rob lived together until February 2020, when Katie left Rob to go live with her new boyfriend. Katie and Rob are not divorced or legally separated as of December 31, 2020. Rob has a daughter, Emily, who is a dependent child (qualifying child) of Rob and lived with Rob for all of 2020. Rob paid all costs of maintaining the home for him and Emily for all of 2020. Rob does not know where Katie is, and he would not be able to get Katie to sign anything. What would be the most beneficial filing status that Rob could use for 2020? Assume Rob has taxable income of $300,000.
.Alab obliged himself to give his only cow to Paul. However, no date was stipulated for the delivery of the cow. While still in possession of Alab, the cow gave birth to a bouncing calf. Who among the parties is entitled to the bouncing calf? Alab, because Paul has not yet demanded delivery. Paul, because the calf was born after the perfection of the contract. Alab, because it was born before his obligation to deliver the cow arises. Paul, if he will pay additional cost for the calf to be agreed upon by the parties.
Han Solo is divorced during 2020. Their son lives with Han’s former spouse, Princess Leia. Han lives alone, and Princess Leia supports their son. During 2020, Wolverine is married to Storm, and they have 2 children (i.e., dependents). Wolverine and Storm have a fight in March; Wolverine leaves and never returns. Storm has no idea where Wolverine is. Storm supports the two children. For 2020, what is the filing status for Han Solo and Storm? Han Solo: Single / Storm: Married filing separately Han Solo: Head of Household / Storm: Married filing separately Han Solo: Head of Household / Storm: Head of Household Han Solo: Married filing separately / Storm: Single Han Solo: Single / Storm: Head of Household
Aishwarya's husband passed away in 2021. She needs to determine whether Jasmine, her 17-year-old stepdaughter, who is single, qualifies as her dependent in 2022. Jasmine is a resident but not a citizen of the United States. She lived in Aishwarya's home from June 15 through December 31, 2022. Aishwarya provided more than half of Jasmine's support for 2022. Required: Is Aishwarya allowed to claim Jasmine as a dependent for 2022? Would Aishwarya be allowed to claim Jasmine as a dependent for 2022 if Aishwarya provided more than half of Jasmine's support in 2022, Jasmine lived in Aishwarya's home from July 15 through December 31 of 2022, and Jasmine reported gross income of $5,000 for the year? Would Aishwarya be allowed to claim Jasmine as a dependent for 2022 if Aishwarya provided more than half of Jasmine's support in 2022, Jasmine lived in Aishwarya's home from July 15 through December 31 of 2022, and Jasmine reported gross income of $2,500 for the year?
ASAP! Danny owns a home in Philadelphia. His company transfers him to Miami on March 9, 2020, and he sells his house in Philadelphia in early April. He purchases a new home in Miami on April 2, 2020. On December 20, Danny's company transfers him to Albany. In January 2021, he sells the Miami home and purchases a new home in Albany. Despite the fact that multiple sales have occurred within a two year period, § 121 benefits can be used on the sale of the second home.