Explain.............. You have a large set of data with n elements, where n will tend to get very large. There is an algorithm that takes at most 10log2n + 12n + 1 time-steps to complete atask. Which of the following is the worst-case time complexity of this algorithm?а. О(n)b. O(1)С. О(n2)O d. O(log2n )Clear my choice

Here in this question we have given a large set of data of n element.there is an algorithm which…

You have a large set of data with n elements, where n will tend to get very large. There is an algorithm that takes at most 10log,n + 12n + 1 time-steps to complete a task. Which of the following is the worst-case time complexity of this algorithm? O(n) O b. O(1) O c. O(n?) O d. O(log2n ) Clear my choice

You have a large set of data with n elements, where n will tend to get very large. There is an algorithm that takes at most 10log,n + 12n + 1 time-steps to complete a task. Which of the following is the worst-case time complexity of this algorithm? O(n) O b. O(1) O c. O(n?) O d. O(log2n ) Clear my choice

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following algorithm that uses a list of n elements (alist). What is the worst case runtime of this algorithm? for each element in alist 1. ask the user for an input, call it value 2. search value in alist using the linear search algorithm 3. if value exists in alist, print "successful" otherwise print "unsuccessful" Question 9 options: O(n log n) O(n) O(2^n) O(1) O(log n) O(n^2)
Suppose T(n) is the time to execute an algorithm with input size n. Which of the following algorithms with the T(n) show is not good to be solved by divide-and-conquer? (Choose the best answer) A. T(n) = 2T(n/2) + 2nB. T(n) = 10T(n/10) + 10nC. T(n) = 2T(n/2) + 2n2D. T(n) = 2T(n/2) + 100n10E. T(n) = T(n-1) + 2T(n-2)
Let X(1..n) and Y(1..n) contain two lists of n integers, each sorted in nondecreasingorder. Give the best (worst-case complexity) algorithm that you can think for finding(a) the largest integer of all 2n combined elements.(b) the second largest integer of all 2n combined elements.(c) the median (or the nth smallest integer) of all 2n combined elements.For instance, X = (4, 7, 8, 9, 12) and Y = (1, 2, 5, 9, 10), then median = 7, the nthsmallest, in the combined list (1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10, 12). [Hint: use the conceptsimilar to binary search]
Analyze the complexity of the algorithm below by determining a function f(n) such that T(n), the worst-case complexity of the algorithm, is Θ(f(n)). input(n) x <- 0 for i <- 1 to n do for j <- i + 1 to n do for k <- 1 to j - i do x <- x +1
Suppose we are to sort a set of 'n' integers using an algorithm with time complexity O (log2 n) that takes 0.5 ms (milliseconds) in the worst case when n = 20,000. How large an element can the algorithm then handle in 1 ms? (Note that only numeric answers can be provided.)
The algorithm of Euclid computes the greatest common divisor (GCD) of two integer numbers a and b. The following pseudo-code is the original version of this algorithm. Algorithm Euclid(a,b)Require: a, b ≥ 0Ensure: a = GCD(a, b) while b ̸= 0 do t ← b b ← a mod b a ← tend whilereturn a We want to estimate its worst case running time using the big-Oh notation. Answer the following questions: a. Let x be a integer stored on n bits. How many bits will you need to store x/2? b. We note that if a ≥ b, then a mod b < a/2. Assume the values of the input integers a and b are encoded on n bits. How many bits will be used to store the values of a and b at the next iteration of the While loop? c. Deduce from this observation, the maximal number iterations of the While loop the algorithm will do.
Respond to two other classmates’ postings by critically reviewing your classmate's answer. The question: Differentiate between Big O, big Omega(Ω) and big theta, and which one you think is better to measure your algorithm efficiency, justify? 1st Answer: The better way to measure an algorithm is Big O because, in the worst-case scenario, we determine an algorithm's upper bound on execution time. We need to understand the scenario in which most operations are carried out. The worst scenario for a linear search is when an element x to be searched, is empty from the array. When x is empty, the search() method compares it with elements in arr[] one by one. Then that will show us the worst case of the algorithm which makes it easier to compare it to other classifications. 2nd Answer: The better way to measure an algorithm is Big O because we use big O notation is important when working with algorithms. We can develop efficient algorithms which can lead to less code(space complexity)…
Write an algorithm called MatrixRowMultiple(A[0…n – 1, 0… n – 1]) which takes an n x n matrix A and outputs if true, if each element in the first row is twice the value of the corresponding element of row 2. Otherwise, it returns false. (ii) Determine the worst case complexity of the algorithm which you have developed.
Consider the following MAXMIN algorithm. How many comparisons does it use? Is it likely to be faster or slower than the divide-and-conquer algorithmin practice? procedure maxmin2(S) comment computes maximum and minimum of S[1..n] in max and min resp. 1. if n is odd then max:=S[n]; min:=S[n] 2. else max:=−∞; min:=∞ 3. for i := 1 to n/2 do 4. if S[2i − 1] ≤ S[2i] 5. then small:=S[2i − 1]; large:=S[2i] 6. else small:=S[2i]; large:=S[2i − 1] 7. if small < min then min:=small 8. if large > max then min:=small
The time complexity equation of merger-sort is T(n) = 2* T(n/2) + n, where T(1) = C and C is a constant. Solve this equation by giving detailed steps. If you have an equation like the following T(n) = 3* T(n/3) + n, where T(1)=T(2)=C, what would be T(n)?
Take into account the MAXMIN methodology below. It uses how many comparisons? Is it more likely to operate quicker or slower in practise than the divide-and-conquer algorithm? procedure The remark maxmin2(S) calculates the maximum and minimum of S[1..n] in max and min, respectively. 1. if n is odd then max:=S[n]; min:=S[n] 2. else max:=−∞; min:=∞ 3. for i := 1 to n/2 do 4. if S[2i − 1] ≤ S[2i] 5. then small:=S[2i − 1]; large:=S[2i] 6. else small:=S[2i]; large:=S[2i − 1] 7. if small < min then min:=small 8. if large > max then min:=small
You are given 3 algorithms A1, A2 and A3 solving the same problem. Youknow that in the the running times are T1(n) = n5n T2(n) = 210n2 + n3 T3(n) = 105log10(nn) For which problem sizes is A2 better than A1 ? Justify. For which problem sizes is A2 better than A3 ? Justify.