Mutually exclusive capital budgeting projects are those that a. if accepted or rejected do not affect the cash flows of other projects. b. if accepted will produce a negative NPV. c. if rejected preclude the acceptance of all other competing projects. d. if accepted preclude the acceptance of all other competing projects. e. if rejected imply that all other competing projects have a positive NPV.

Mutually exclusive capital budgeting projects are those that a. if accepted or rejected do not affect the cash flows of other projects. b. if accepted will produce a negative NPV. c. if rejected preclude the acceptance of all other competing projects. d. if accepted preclude the acceptance of all other competing projects. e. if rejected imply that all other competing projects have a positive NPV.

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter11: Capital Budgeting And Risk

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTD

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Discuss the principal limitations of the cash payback method for evaluating capital investment proposals.
Capital budgeting projects are classified as either independent projects or mutually exclusive projects. [Consider NPV, IRR, Payback Period, and Profitability Index] What is a independent project? What is a mutually exclusive project? Why (or under what circumstance) should either be accepted?
In capital budgeting, a project is accepted only if the internal rate of return equals or: a. exceeds the net present value b. is less than the required rate of return c. exceeds the required rate of return d. exceeds the accrual accounting rate of return
Compare capital budgeting decision criteria, Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Is it possible for conflicts to exist between the NPV and the IRR when mutually exclusive projects are being evaluated? Explain.
NPV and IRR are two of the most important decision criteria in capital budgeting. Will NPV and IRR methods always yield the same accept/reject decision? Please elaborate and list one potential cause of ranking conflicts between NPV and IRR.
The conflicts in project ranking in capital budgeting as per NPV and IRR may arise because of: A. Size disparity B. Time disparity C. Life disparity D. All of the above
When evaluating capital projects, the decisions using the NPV method and the IRR method will disagree if: Group of answer choices the cash flow pattern is conventional. the projects are mutually exclusive. the cash flow pattern is unconventional and the projects are mutually exclusive. the projects are independent.
Which of the following is not a capital budgeting technique? Select one: a. Net present value b. Discounted Payback period c. Payback Period d. Profitability index e. Ratio Analysis Which capital budgeting projects are preferred? Select one: a. Lower payback period b. None of the option c. Higher payback period d. Lower cash inflow projects e. Average payback period
Of the capital budgeting techniques discussed, which works equally well with normal and non-normal cash flows and with independent and mutually exclusive projects? Multiple Choice Net present value Discounted payback period Payback period Modified internal rate of return
Which of the statements below describes the correct capital budgeting decision rule? i. Reject a project if the NPV is less than the IRR. ii. Accept a project if the cost of capital exceeds the IRR. iii. Reject a project if the cost of capital is above the IRR. iv. Accept a project if the cost of capital is more than the NPV.
Which of the following should NOT be included as a cash flow in initial, operating or terminal cash flows of a capital budgeting project? A.Opportunity Costs B.Incremental Revenues C.Sunk costs D.Relevant revenues E. Incremental Costs
Which of the following is a problem with using payback period for capital budgeting decisions bias against long term projects in favor of short term projects bias against short term projects in favor of long term projects time value of money conceptual violation