Essay on Zero Tolerance

This study examines the effect zero-tolerance policies have on minority girls in public and private school districts. The zero-tolerance policies intended to protect students, faculty, and staff have unintended negative consequences due to overuse or abuse of the policies. According to the literature, some schools use the policy as social control over minor incidents as a reason to expel or suspend students unnecessarily. Many causes of the overuse stem from federal funding needed for things such

The zero tolerance policies can be best described as, “a philosophy or policy that mandates the application of predetermined consequences, most often severe in nature, that are intended to be applied regardless of the seriousness of behavior, mitigating circumstances or situational context (Graham et al 2008 np)”. There was a rise of the zero tolerance policies that started with the scare of the war on drugs during the 1980s. There was this fear of copious amounts of drugs coming into the schools

on, however not quite the reasons why one would think. The new upcoming law of the zero tolerance policy was built to create a safer academic environment, but due to the circumstances; it has gotten quite out of hand. The policy is now seen as a direct pipeline toward juvenile/prisons, an increase in irrational suspensions, and unfairly misdirected to minority groups. The main consequence in the zero tolerance policy is suspension. However, due to the misuse of the policy, many students being

Zero tolerance, a concept that first appeared in the early 1980s, helps to ensure that each individual who breaks a stated rule or law receives the same penalty. This prevents subjectivity in determining punishment for individuals (Johns,2009). Zero-tolerance policies in the workplace typically leaves very little discretion for an employer, which result in termination for a first infraction. Zero-tolerance policies provide for automatic punishment for violating a company rule (Johns,2009). The

What is Zero Tolerance law? In all 50 states plus the District of Columbia, it is illegal for people under the age of 21 years old to purchase or have possession of alcohol. It is illegal for anybody who is under the influence of alcohol (normally 0.08 percent or higher blood – alcohol concentration) to operate any motor vehicles especially a car, that’s why all the 50 states have adopted a law that can punish those individuals who decide to drive under the influence of alcohol or DUI (driving under

A zero- tolerance policy exists in almost every organization. Corporations, government agencies, and universities are or have adopted the policy. “The policy is considered to be a practical tool for combating problems and also viewed as a political tool” (Curwin & Mendler, 1999). Zero tolerance means different things to different people. The can be two companies with the same policy; however deal with the problem in radically different ways. Zero tolerance is a concept that sounds straightforward

that student to know that misbehavior is unacceptable but also shows that the school still cares about the student by keeping them on school grounds. I also believe that zero tolerance policies either need to be revised or replace with programs that allow for growth when a student misbehaves. The future of zero tolerance policies looks bleak because the history has shown that it isolates students from

In school zero-tolerance policies are intended to eliminate behaviors deemed as intolerable, such as violence, bullying, or having a weapon. But these policies are useless and unneeded because they cannot be used until after the damage has been done. Often times the intolerable behavior becomes more prevalent when the types of policies are put into place. Evidence of just how useless the zero-tolerance policy is in instances of school shootings, such as Columbine. They definitely had a policy of

Back in the 1990’s, the Zero Tolerance Policy was created in response to the fear of crimes and school shootings at the time. In theory, it was a great idea to create this, however, in more recent times it is said that “Under zero-tolerance policies, harsh punishment applies regardless of circumstances” (Gjetten). In other words, no matter how small or childish the problem is, there will be zero tolerance for it and a harsh punishment will be given. In recent times, parents have been infuriated at

“Zero-tolerance policies punish all offenses severely, no matter how minor.” One’s first impulse may be to speculate that as a result of the policy, schools are safer. There is not however, any clear statistics that the schools are indeed safer. The first step in analyzing the zero-tolerance policy is determining how effective it actually is. The overall goal of the policy is clear – safer schools. The federal zero-tolerance policy is vague which leaves much of the interpretation up to the individual