Moral Argument Essay

The moral argument, in various forms, argues for the existence of God and refers to the claim that God is needed to provide a foundation for the existence of objective moral values and duties. One form of this argument claims that morality is derived from a higher power, which can be referred to as God. It explains how man has a moral conscience, to whom they feel ashamed or frightened to disobey. Thus, this leads to the logical inference that if man feels guilty then there must be one to whom man

determine what position Mill would been most likely to support on the topic of abortion. Joh Stuart Mill was a strong proponent, and indeed considered to be the father of, Utilitarianism. This philosophical theory is defined as a form of moral idealism which sets the moral standard of an action based off the greatest potential for harm or happiness that said action could produce. Essentially, Utilitarianism determines whether or not the action will create a significant amount of pleasure and improve quality

legal context. In this paper, I will discuss the moral argument of sexual morality in relation to marriage rights. Specifically, the collective right of polyamorous relationships to be recognized under the notion of the “fundamental right to marry,” as addressed by William Baude, in the New York Times. Although there are objections in relation to polyamorous marriages, as is discussed in relation to the fundamental right to marry, I defend the argument for polyamorous marriage. Discussion of legal

More: Ergon Argument- everything has proper function Phonemes- moral example/exemplar Main Points of Aristotle's Ethical Philosophy 1. The highest good and the end toward which all human activity is directed is happiness, which can be defined as continuous contemplation of eternal and universal truth. 2. One attains happiness by a virtuous life and the development of reason and the faculty of theoretical wisdom. For this one requires sufficient external goods to ensure health, leisure, and the

Moral principles generally shape a person’s character. Such principles ultimately influence the way a person makes decisions, and may become the foundation that people pattern their lives after. However, in Chinese philosophy there exists a difference of opinion of moral principles. One by the name of Mozi advocates impartiality and condems partiality. He expresses that everyone should benefit everyone equally. Although this may seem benevolent, the very idea is impractical. Mozi’s point of view

which which are the problem of evil, the fine tuning argument and the moral argument. According to theism, God is: “that being which no greater is possible, and he is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent.”. By having a God who only desires good, and us living in a world where evil exists, it is logically impossible and that is what created the problem of evil. There are two sides of the problem of evil which are the logical and evidential argument. The logical side states that: “An omnipotent God

One’s New Sword, argues against moral isolationism, which she defines as a position where, “Moral judgement…is a kind of coinage valid only in its country of origin” (161). She notes that supporters of this ethical theory view moral isolationism as a way to be respectful and tolerant of other cultures. In addition, holding this opinion about morality means that no one can understand any culture except their own, and thus, cannot make judgements of other culture’s moral standards. In this paper, I present

Prinz is a man who defends moral relativism as opposed to moral objectivism. To be able to understand the argument between moral relativism and moral objectivism they must first be defined. Moral relativism is a claim that is only true or false relative to some variable and not absolutely. This variable could be things such as culture, place, or society. This means two different truths that contradict each other could both be considered true depending on the culture. Moral objectivism is a claim

Social conformation may just be the embodiment of self doubt, and the manifestation of deformed logic, but it could also be the justification behind humanity’s sustainability and prosperity through the ages. Adolescents within this blossoming modern teenage society are constantly being enticed with suggestions, recommendations, and advice from peers, idols, and media. However, how does this play into the molding and creation of current and future generations? It seems to be that many people’s desire

All moral arguments for the existence of God work on the principle that we all have a shared sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, broadly speaking, humans worldwide have a vague idea of what is right and what is wrong; a moral argument for the existence of God would say that this mutual understanding is proof of God's existence. Immanuel Kant put forward this argument (although, not a moral argument); God as the source of objective morality. Firstly, he addressed the categorical imperative;