O.J. Simpson Essay

There were many cases I found interesting. However, I did not want to speak about a case involving children because I was worried I might appear bias. I also did not want to pick a case previously spoken about in class, such as Andrea Yates. I decided to pick Jodi Arias. Not only is the case about adults, it is saucy. The Case This case revolves around the relationship between Jodi and Travis Alexander. The two had a on and off again relationship lasting between one to two years. Travis who

or criminal court. With this assignment the first person that came to mine was O. J. Simpson because he was charge in two criminal case and one civil case. I will be discussing what was called, “The Trial of the Century” the O. J. Simpson Murder Trial. I will give the reader a brief overview of the trial. I will explain the main laws that were violated and the possible penalties of the crime. In the O. J. Simpson Murder Trial, because it was the most publicized case I had never seen. People were

The Casey Anthony Trial One of the most controversial and polemic trials of all times since the OJ Simpson trial was the case of Casey Anthony and the murder of her two year old daughter. All the evidences and witness revealed that she was the main suspect in the murder of her daughter; however in 2011 she was found not guilty of this murder due to several different aspects. This paper will inform and provide the reader with detailed information about this case. In addition the reader will find

It should be noted I observed several drops of blood in a trail from apartment 101 to 99. I also observed many drops of blood on the patio in front of apartment 99. I later asked Brown if she knew where the knife Santos had used was. Santos said she did not and she could not remember which knife Santos had used. Santos pointed to a knife on the kitchen counter stated it looked like the knife the Santos had tried to stab her with. I observed the knife was all metal, to include the handle, and

What were 3 things that went wrong for Donald Marshall Jr. during the investigation, trial and subsequent re-investigations? One thing that went wrong for Marshall was the police’s use of John Pratico as a witness. The police used the fact that Pratico is a very suggestible and delusional person to ensure that the version of the truth that the police wanted would be his official testimony. They manipulated him into giving the testimony that they wanted so that Marshall would be convicted. He was

• June 19, 1990 • His girlfriend, Elizabeth Bain, went missing • She had told her parents that she was going out to check the tennis schedules at school, the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus. Elizabeth never came back. Her car was eventually recovered, and forensic tests revealed that blood on the back seat was hers. Elizabeth’s body has never been found. • Robert wrote many years later, “In the days that followed, the confusion and terror of having to confront Liz’s disappearance and the

In the Absence of Evidence On the night of December 23, 2002, Scott Peterson killed his wife, Laci Peterson, and unborn child, Conner, in cold blood. He then dumped their bodies in San Francisco Bay and returned home (Case 1). At least, that’s what the prosecution would want you to think. Was Scott Peterson proven guilty of his wife’s murder beyond reasonable doubt? No, he was not, and here’s why. How did the prosecution prove that Scott had killed Laci? Well the day Laci went missing, at around

The Steinberg trial that took place 30 years ago November 5th, 1987, where little Lisa Steinberg was murdered by the adoptive father who goes by Joel Steinberg charged with second degree murder and manslaughter for beating his daughter to death only for her to die of brain injuries.it was not till police discovered that he had hidden the evidence of his knuckles which had blood on them. Joel Steinberg’s companion Hedda called 911 as soon as she saw Lisa on the bathroom floor. Lisa was not only beaten

The OJ Simpson murder case was an event that transfixed the nation over 20 years ago, with everyone who was around back then having some recollection of the whole ordeal. Today, that same case in entering back into the public consciousness, as a new television series dramatizing the events, entitled “The People vs. OJ Simpson”, just premiered. In an op-ed for the New York Times, John McWhorter pens an argument that the case was symbolic of race relations between the police and the African-American

The OJ Simpson trial was propaganda for African American rights and revolutionized the relationship between the police and the African American population. “Only a monster would do this to the mother of your kids.”, an LAPD Police officer said during the case trial to convince the jury and the judge to convict OJ. The jury called its verdict of not guilty and the positive uproar began. I believe that OJ was not guilty due to a couple of reasons. The first stop in any case is physical evidence used