Chemical Weapons Convention

regards the coercive activities by North Korea, in particular its pursuit of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and ballistic missile capabilities, to comprise the most urgent security threat in the region. The USG is fully committed to maintaining peace throughout the Korean Peninsula by effectively working with our allies and other regional states to deter and defend against North Korean military provocations, weapons proliferation, and illicit trafficking; and to support enforcement of international

Biological warfare is war waged with deadly chemicals, biological agents, or radioactive materials (CBR). They can be used to kill large amounts of people, destroy food, or just temporarily stun them for a matter of time so troops can come in and torture them or do whatever troops led by an manipulative tyrant who destroys everything. Using CBR, allowed you to kill everything and leave the buildings standing instead of nuclear weapons which destroy everything, put fallout in the air, and have radioactive

Weapons are an important aspect of warfare. They help determine how the war will go. If one side as better and more technologically advanced weapons, they have an advantage over their opponents. Nations struggle to create innovated weapons or improve old upon ones. Not every advancement is appreciated and respected. An example of this type of weapon is the chemical weapons, gas or chemical warfare. Chemical warfare is not an accepted or approved weapon, but one that has been banned from use during

Unlike bullet wounds that healed, leaving a person looking relatively the same, chemical weapons left long lasting cosmetic effects on its victims. Soldiers who were exposed suffered grizzly burns on every body part that was exposed leaving the victim looking almost sub-human for his entire life. Indeed the outward effects of the gas were

what is referred to as Gulf War Syndrome in military personnel, and the flagrant violation of the international legal rules (Articles 55 and 56 of Protocol I (1977) to the Geneva Convention of 1949). There is also suspicion of a conspiracy by the United Nations with regards to the use of these highly radioactive weapons to cover up their use. Legacy Impact of Depleted Uranium Use in Yugoslavia

under his command during the Syrian Civil war and ISIS, the development and use of chemical weapons in Syria, and his broken promises. Syrian Civil War paragraph First, he should be removed from office,owing to the fact of his actions throughout the

Chemical Warfare is not the same as nuclear warfare, or the same as biological warfare. Chemical warfare involves using the deadly properties of chemical substances as weapons.Most weapons used in chemical warfare are considered to be“weapons of mass destruction” or, WMDs, and are not considered to be conventional weapons. Chemical warfare does not depend upon explosive force to neutralize targets; it depends on the chemical properties of a chemical agent weaponized. Defoliants are an example.They

Records of the implementation of chemicals in battle tactics on a simple scale can be found as early as the Bronze Age.1 However, relatively recent developments in industry have facilitated the production, mobilization, and dissemination of destructive chemical agents. As a result of said technological innovations, the scale of implementation has shifted, resulting in vastly amplified hazards to not just military personnel, but also to the general public.2-3 The Geneva Protocol was enacted in 1925

are enduring the pain from “incendiary weapons,” which has led to a lifetime of either physical or mental problem. Vatican City advocated that the Protocol III of the Convention on Conventional Weapons needs to be reinforced to executing the use of these weapons. Amid the 71st Session of the United Nations General Assembly, Archbishop Bernardito Auza, Permanent Observer of the Holy See addressed that “The Holy See recommends therefore that discussions on weapons of mass destruction go beyond the traditional

that serious and/or irreversible harm…may be caused…proportional action to prevent and/or abate this harm must be taken…” (Maras, 2013 citing Trouwborst, A., 2006) I assume that this rogue nation is not a signatory to the 1972 Biological Weapons and Toxins Convention or any other type of international agreement. Unless the political will exists to punish this rogue nation, these written agreements are ineffective. (Cross, 2017) Therefore, the following legal remedies are left to the international community: