Comparison of oedipus

When considering “The Tale of Sohrab from the Shahnameh, and Sophocles’ work Oedipus Tyrannus, each contain two main male protagonists who undertake parallel tragic journeys which highlights the perils of absent parenting, which lead to death in each tale. Son and Father Oedipus and King Laius of Oedipus Tyrannus, and Sohrab and Rostam of Shahnameh have fungible qualities that, at times make them mirror images of each, though each of their fates are different, they share the same message, actions

When expressed differently in movie form, Sophocles’ plays Antigone and Oedipus Rex share differences and similarities. Both capture the ancient tragedies each in its own style, with modern and traditional elements. Retold by Jean Anouilh and produced in 1972, the film Antigone tells of the acts of the original Greek play in a modern manner. Inversely, the 1957 film Oedipus Rex clings to the William Butler Yeats adaptation true to the famed ancient play. The two contrast in physical appearance as

Comparison of Oedipus and Hamlet Compare and contrast Oedipus and Hamlet. Is Oedipus more a man of action? Or is he more a man driven by whim and sudden, rash decisions? Which character is more selfless? Does Hamlet show any signs of selfish motives in his actions or inactions? Which protagonist seems more learned? wiser? more religious? more loving? more incestuous? Which seems to be a better murder investigator? Does Oedipus have any of Claudius' motives when he kills the king, Laius? Then

are multiple definitions of a tragedy. People believe that regular people are more capable of partaking in a tragedy. Hamlet and Oedipus are examples of the traditional tragedy. Hamlet’s actions were all voluntary. He knew what he was doing and the consequences. Oedipus suffered from fate of his family. He didn’t realize exactly what he was doing or the consequences. Oedipus is the truest tragic hero according to the traditional definition of a tragedy, the downfall of his royalty and uncontrollable

Anakin and Oedipus evolve their personalities as the conflicts of the story increase. These conflicts ignite certain aspects of the characters that will eventually lead to their fate. These tragic characters are meant to have flawed personality traits, so the audience can connect with the characters due to the realistic traits and actions that any human can experience. The mental aspect of archetypal tragedies shape tragic events occuring in the stories. Pride, paranoia, and hamartia, would eventually

To begin with, if Oedipus and Frogs are to be taken into consideration and the aspects of the plot dissected using the guidelines provided in Poetics, then based on Aristotle’s definition of plot as “organization of events,” it can be stated that the structure of plot is the same for the two stories of opposing genres, for both have “a beginning, a middle and an end” one following after the other resulting in a well-constructed plot not beginning or ending at any arbitrary point (Aristotle 10 & 13-14)

One of the most clear similarity in both Story of Sohrab and Oedipus Tyrannous is usually that the protagonists are renown famous and mighty heroes of the times. In Oedipus Tyrannous, Oedipus comes out as a brilliant and strong warrior. He intelligently appropriately solved the riddle of the sphinx to establish just how smart he was. He easily were able to defeat his dad and his men when he was offended by them while on his way to Thebes. That is confirmation that he was both a solid and sensible

Although Oedipus Tyrannus was written more than a decade after the Antigone, it still reflects many of the themes and motifs through some of the same characters. Oedipus, the present king of Thebes finds himself attempting to solve the riddle that is his life; Antigone, the daughter of the former king must decide between following divine or man made law. Although both title characters face separate conflicts they both reflect similar traits at differing times in their respective plays. Alongside

of prejudice before. They’re both just human nature. Human nature doesn’t define someone as a person, and there’s nothing wrong with it. Hubris is simply part of human nature. For one example, Sophocles portrays both Oedipus and Creon as having a major case of hubris. Oedipus declares himself a ‘world-renowned king’ (Sophocles) early on in the play. Throughout the play, he refuses to accept anything that people try to tell him. In a similar way, Creon refuses to let anyone go against his will

Oedipus and Victor Frankenstein are blinded by their ideas of success and demonstrate the psychological attributions of egocentrism. Symptoms of egocentrism is stated as, “the natural restriction on our perception caused by the simple fact that we can only see the world from our perspective” (“Witbourne”). Victor Frankenstein’s creation is scientific knowledge is corrupted by his egotistic characteristics as his purpose is to gain fame and recognition. The creation of the Creature was suppose to