Ethical Hedonism Essay

Sort By:
Page 5 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    intriguing lesson. It is a theory of ethics that assesses actions based on maximizing benefits in reducing the negatives; based on bouncing human interests. It was developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, it is a socially conscious approach to hedonism that holds that the greatest good is to promote happiness and alleviate suffering for the greatest number of people. ( Chaffee, 9.3) Utilitarianism is the most common moral theory practiced in the business world today, to break down what it is basically

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Egoism Vs Utilitarianism

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is Utilitarianism a better model compared to egoism? Two examples or branches of consequentialism are egoism and utilitarianism. The definition of utilitarianism is simply, doing the most good for the most people. The definition of egoism is the habit of valuing everything only in reference to one's personal interest; selfishness. Egoism is simply about you and you’re self-interest compared to utilitarianism is looking at others interests. There are pros and cons to each branch; however I personally

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The following are just some fo the many considerations raised by those who wish to determine whether utilitarianism is a valid moral theory. Utilitarianism 0 n January 29, 1993, Steven Page, the man-ager of a horticulture nursery, threw his three-year-old daughter, Kale,' from the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco and then jumped to his own death. Earlier that day, he had shot and killed his thirty-seven-year-old ex-wife, Nancy. Local police were mystified about his mo-tive, and neighbors were

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Value hedonists’ view that pleasure is the only intrinsic good and pain is the only intrinsic evil seems to be an assumption rather than a deduced conclusion. This can be seen by asking why it is that pleasure is an intrinsic good. There seem to be only two possible answers to this question. The first possible reply is that the intrinsic good of pleasure is simply assumed, in which case the entire value hedonist’s view is an assumption involving no deduction whatsoever. Once someone agrees with the

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Accounting to the text Epicurus Philosophy is to live the good life which means live a life with peace of mind and cheerfulness. That being said in chapter 3 of crimes and misdemeanours many characters live a life that pays the price. If Epicurus View the Woody Allen film crimes and misdemeanours you'd probably say a whole lot about it. He would say many things about the characters that are featured in the film because of what they have gone through, and where there destiny has led them too. According

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Decent Essays

    to five others. The hedonic calculus would show that they should do this, it would increase the amount of pleasure for more people (Pojman 116).Of course we know that this is morally wrong, and that putting other humans’ lives over another is not ethical. However, in some cases, I think that humans use this calculus

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In David Suits' article, An Epicurean Idea Suits addresses in detail the theory of Epicureanism. Suit begins by introducing the major fear humanity faces and explains to us how Epicurus would refute each fear. Suit then goes one step further to explain the different aspects of life that allow humans to achieve the ultimate goal in Epicurus’s mind ataraxia, which is peace of mind. The Epicurean ideal propose 3 major fears humans have in their lives. The fear of God can easily be eliminated

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ultimately, I believe that Bernard Williams’ argument that utilitarianism is inconsistent with personal integrity is right. It removes the ability for formulate a decision based on one’s own ideas and values. Utilitarianism can truly limit one’s life and that is not right. The basis of morality is the quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct. Therefore, morality cannot demand that one make decisions that he/she truly does not choose. Every person has a free will and should

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Epicureans And Cynicism

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Epicureans and Cynics, life must be lived in the utmost organic way by avoiding empty pleasures, psychological pain and not depend on opinion of others. For Epicureans, the natural life is moderation in pursuing desires and removing all unnecessary troubles and fears from the mind. Cynicism focuses on rejecting conventional desires such as power, status, sex and wealth, and live in agreement with nature by finding the bare natural needs for our existence. Both philosophies draw attention

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is believed that the utilitarian concept does not allow for an individual to invoke what they feel is their “God-given” right because utilitarianism is mainly concerned with achieving the greatest good for the majority of people with little concern about the “individual”. Based on this theory, it would be in the highest order to actually infringe on an individual’s rights so as to benefit the greater population. This theory is rarely ever concerned with justice, benevolence, egocentricity, or

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays