Judgment

McKichan v. St. Louis Hockey Club, L.P. was a personal injury case filed on March 17, 1998, in which the plaintiff claimed that the defendant club should be held vicariously liable for their employee’s actions that caused the plaintiff’s injury. The injury in question occurred in Peoria, Illinois during an IHL game on December 15, 1990 between the Peoria Rivermen and the Milwaukee Admirals. While the St. Louis Hockey Club technically wasn’t playing in the game, they can be held liable for the injury

who are. The apostle James shares the word of Christ with the people around him who are not living the teaching of Christ. James 5:1-12 thoroughly emphasizes the impact of God’s judgment on each individual, based on how each person lived. Furthermore, this passage explains vividly in great detail the consequences and judgment one will face on the day of the Lord’s return. James is warning the people what is to come if they continue to live they way they are. He is also giving hope to those who are

To respond to the statement, “Ways of knowing are a check on our instinctive judgments.” This essay will address the extent of the effect ways of knowing have on our moral instinct. The word check in the prescribed title is referring the ways of knowing as boundary, or means of confirmation for the instinctive judgements. In Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink, he said that instinctive judgement is, in one critical respect, no different from our conscious thinking: in both, we are able to develop our rapid

All parents have responsibilities to raise well-rounded, well-adapted children, which includes fostering moral reasoning in our future leaders. Moral reasoning is the process of making judgments about the rightness or wrongness of specific acts (Boyd, 2014, p.247). There are right ways and wrongs ways to judge a choice or situation, but from early childhood, parents can imprint healthy and positive moral reasoning in various ways. One positive and healthy way parents, educators, and role models can

A year and a half ago I noticed that a staff member was having a difficult time at work. It appeared that she was overwhelmed and over rot in the office. On several occasions she was in tears in the office and it had been reported that she was snapping at the instructors. Everyone has a “bad day” at work from time to time but this appeared to be much more than just a bad day. If I were to break it down into steps according to the ORJI cycle. This is how it appeared to me now. Observation. I observed

Iron contends that the marking does not satisfy the extreme and outrageous behavior element. Absent such extreme and outrageous behavior, the cause of action cannot survive as a matter of law and the defendant should be granted a Motion for Summary Judgment. Statement of Facts Dr. Brandon Iron (Dr. Iron) is a physician specializing in obstetrics and gynecology.

piercings, and I’m always changing my hair color. The way one looks, whether it is tattoos, piercings, or ones hair style, may cause others to pass judgments. Although there are different reasons for the change in one’s appearance, there are always consequences that follow, some more severe than others. As human beings, we tend to make decisions and rash judgments based on very limited information which is controlled by our personal belief system and upbringing. This day and age, tattoos are becoming very

Hare agues in Moral Thinking that if one clearly thinks about what one ought to do , it will therefore lead to some sort of utilitarianism. R. M Hare believed that moral judgments are universal prescriptions. Thus, it is a misuse of the word 'ought' to say ‘’you ought, but I can conceive of another situation, identical in all its properties to this one, except that the corresponding person ought not’’ (Hare 1963:10). The following essay uses Hare’s fanatical Nazi example on how he derives preference

When I discussed these topics with Sarah, she did a great job of actively listening to me and placed no judgment on the statements I made. If she needed clarification on the information I provided to her, she did not hesitate to ask questions or summarize my statements, to ensure she heard the correct message. Her ability to listen, not pass judgments, and respect my feelings contributed to her effectiveness as a counselor, and increased my willingness to be open with her

Amit and Greene’s hypothesis supports a dual-processing theory of morality (Amit & Greene), deontological judgments, favoring the individual, and utilitarian judgements, favoring the many for the greater good. Another theory posed by Eugene M. Caruso and Francesca Gino (2011), claims that visual imagery affects ethical behavior generally, rather than a specific