Massacre of the Innocents

Page 1 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • The Massacre Of The Innocents Analysis

    1248 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Massacre of the innocents gives the viewer a glimpse into the life and artistic journey of Flemish Baroque painter Peter Paul Rubens. When one looks at the painting, it is as if they are reading the journal of the artist. The artist’s personal style, which was developed through inspiration from great artists such as Caravaggio, Michelangelo and Raphael, stands out in this painting. One can clearly see elements of the painting which have been influenced by the works of the artists that he carefully

  • Massacre Of The Innocents By Judith Beheading

    921 Words  | 4 Pages

    Though I do not know the background of Massacre of the Innocents, this painting seems to depict a group of men fighting with a group of women over babies, and when the men manage to steal these babies, the men kill them. Besides the death of children, the most peculiar aspect of this painting is the fact that the men and the babies are naked and the women seem to be losing their clothes. The different person’s level of clothing can tell a lot about what is going on. Leaving the men without clothing

  • The Context Of Peter Paul Rubens Massacre Of The Innocents

    1150 Words  | 5 Pages

    A particularly vivid scene is displayed in Peter Paul Rubens’ first portrayal of the slaughter of many innocent civilians of Bethlehem. The Context of Peter Paul Reuben’s Massacre of the Innocents serves as an expression the artist’s identity through the historical content that he has chosen to paint, through the obvious influences of the techniques used in the creation, and the artist’s intention

  • Was The Boston Massacre A Massacre

    1418 Words  | 6 Pages

    menacing attacks. The altercation ended with innocent colonists splattered on the icy ground, the pure snow now stained with burgundy blood, their frosty bodies pierced with lethal bullets, their brisk breaths reduced to clouds of death… Much better. If you were educated in the United States of America, you know the Boston Massacre as the slaughtering of innocent Patriots fighting for liberty, for justice, for freedom. Yet if you are British, the Boston Massacre is an irrelevant event in your Civil War

  • The War Of The Vietnam War

    886 Words  | 4 Pages

    (Charlie Company) were on a search and destroy mission to root out 48th Viet Cong Battalion thought to be in the area” (A&E Networks). The Charlie Company encountered numerous amount of innocent inhabitants when they arrived at My Lai. These inhabitants, however, suffered a tragic event that was called the My Lai Massacre. “The unit met no resistance in My Lai (…..) they only found villagers eating breakfast. Nevertheless, over the next 3 hours they killed as many as 504 Vietnamese civilians” (Digital

  • Massacre: The Cause Of The Boston Massacre

    567 Words  | 3 Pages

    other in the spring of 1770. On March 5, 1770 the Boston Massacre took place. Although, it wasn’t even a massacre. A massacre is defined as the mass-murder of a group of innocent, unaware, unarmed people. What really happened on that day was a riot. Both sides were armed. The colonists had icy snowballs, chunks of wood, and oyster shells; while the British soldiers were armed with muskets and bayonets. There is proof that the Boston Massacre was planned by the colonists and even if it wasn’t the

  • The Pros And Cons Of War

    919 Words  | 4 Pages

    of war including some innocent lives that just get caught in the midst of assault. A war is a large scale combat involving hundreds to thousands of soldiers fighting for their country, freedoms, religious liberty. Of course that means war has a bigger impact and must be carefully considered and justified before attempted. Massacres differ greatly from war simply because they have no good purpose other than to destroy life. They are always senseless hate crimes against innocent human beings intended

  • Is The Second Amendment Right To Bear Arms Still Applicable In 21st Century?

    1189 Words  | 5 Pages

    for them. The right to bear arms is not applicable in twenty first century because people have been using guns for revenge, robbing houses, banks, and to kill people for no reason. The Luby shooting was a massacre that occurred on October 16, 1991. George Hennard was responsible for this massacre. At first he crashed his pickup truck into the luby restaurant. People thought it might be an accident but all of a sudden he took out a gun and started shooting people. He killed twenty three people and

  • Paul Revere And The Boston Massacre

    1201 Words  | 5 Pages

    colonists like the newspapers. The newspaper would show dramatize images to get the colonists to buy their newspaper just as patriot Paul Revere did for the printing of the Boston Massacre. He showed and exaggerated image of what had happened at the Boston Massacre. The newspaper that was published based on the Boston Massacre change the way some people saw Great Britain. There was a mob that had started to attack the British barracks and then started to attack Hugh White, who got surrounded by the mob

  • Boston Massacre Propaganda Essay

    994 Words  | 4 Pages

    Was the Boston Massacre used as propaganda after event took place? The Massacre occurred in 1770 on the night of March 5. The event resulted in the British army shooting and killing 5 men while under attack by a so called “mob”. The shootings took place right outside of The Old State House. Eight shooters were arrested, but soon after their trials it came down to only two of the six to be convicted of manslaughter. This led to colonial leaders like Paul Revere and Samuel Adams publicizing the event