Peter Jennings

In 1986 the democratic nominee for the presidential election was a great man named William Jennings Bryan. Bryan was a religious and moral man who stood for the greater good of farmers, the poor and working class. Populists represent the underdog of society that is seeking injustice, during Bryan’s time period it happened to be the farmer’s agriculture industry that was dying out. A few decades before this election the whole country was running off of agriculture, with the industrialization that

The Populist Party is often referred to as the party of and for the people, and is labeled as such because it was, very candidly, founded by the common people, such as farmers and other laborers. While this party was in power, they had many ambitions and ideas that they sought to spread to others, and aspired to achieve. To understand the topic completely, one requires a general knowledge of the formation of the populist party, the elemental beliefs, goals and ideals, and how the downfall of the

“Margaret Sanger Seeks Pity for Teenage Mothers and Abstinent Couples, 1928” 1. Margaret Sanger’s argument is about birth control. She wants to get out women’s stories so that people can see genuine reasons why women are for the Birth Control Movement. What she uses to support her argument is strong evidence to get the people that are not for the Birth Control movement to see the real problem. Though there may be many with true knowledge about what women with so many children go through, there must

in pamphlets, like the primary sources provides, and placed in churches to show that science and religion could work in tandem. It should be noted that people such as John Rockefeller Jr. supported this cause. Backlash did occur though as William Jennings Bryan posted his own op-ed in the New York Times against evolution. Dr. Davis then showed various cartoons from Ernest James Pace, who was a staunchly against evolution and saw Bryan as a “hero in a cultural war.” After going through the history

1. An ethical dilemma occurs when two moral imperatives contradict one another. In the case of the Scopes Trial, for example, while the Bible stated that God created humans on the sixth day of creation, Darwinian evolution argued that humankind evolved through natural selection over a period of millions of years. This dilemma created a heated debate that impacted the entire country. Describe the circumstances and developments that allowed the dilemma to become an issue in Tennessee in 1925. (See

William Jennings Bryan gave one of the most famous speeches in American history called the Cross of Gold. He gave his speech at the Democratic convention on July 9, 1896, in Chicago. Bryan was very passionate expressed his belief in the different forms of currency. The free silver movement was a big debate during the election of 1896. Acute periods on economic lows in this decade caused panic from farmers who could not pay their debts. Bryan suggested the United States try and use silver behind

William Jennings Bryan was born in Salem, Illinois. He was educated at Illinois College in Jacksonville and Union Law School in Chicago. Bryan practiced law in Jacksonville for several years, but in 1887 moved to Lincoln, Nebraska where he hoped to launch a political career. The Bryans became active in civic affairs and started different discussion groups for men and women where the subject was often politics.He was the Democratic candidate for Congress in a Republican district in Nebraska, but he

William Jennings Bryan was an advocate for the common man and set a precedent for the modern Democratic Party. He was not just a politician, Bryan was a radical reformer and wanted to change the way the government was ran. His speeches and political views were intriguing to his audience, and he presented many ideas that are now seen as way before his time. Margaret LeBeau stated in the novel, “A Godly Hero”, “He is certainly not of our politics, and I know none of our friends approve of him… but

In 1925, a young Tennessee school teacher named John T. Scopes defied the state’s law prohibiting the teaching of evolution. Scopes was arrested and the case immediately got national headlines causing William Jennings Bryan to announce his intention to join the prosecution. Then, the ACLU got involved and offered to defend Scopes. When Darrow heard about the case, he said he would defend the school teacher free of charge. To Darrow’s thinking, Bryan was the embodiment of all those aspects of rural

Raulston, who thought was chosen by god to do this, said that they couldn't use experts which might have been because he wanted people’s support to win for governor. But this was passed through when Mr Darrow called his surprise witness --William Jennings Bryan-- and thought that if he couldn’t talk about evolution then he would talk about the Bible and try to trick Mr Bryan. Mr Darrow called Mr Bryan because he “considered himself an expert on the Bible,” and tried to make Mr Bryan himself say how