Short summary

In chapter one, the difference between the three types of crimes in Canada were discussed: summary, indictable, and hybrid offences. Summary offences take place in provincial/territorial court, and and the maximum penalty fine is six months in prison, five thousand dollars, or both. An example of a summary offence is soliciting in a public place, or carrying a weapon while attending a public meeting. An indictable offence is one that is much more severe. The sentences given are much more serious

Method:- The aim of this research was to further valuable insight into the knowledge of students at Conestoga College regarding the cyber bullying? The purpose of the study was to find out if students are aware of the college policies, laws regarding the cyber bullying. The study about cyberbullying was conducted by doing a research at the Doon Campus of Conestoga College. To conduct the study on Cyber Bullying a survey method was employed by the researchers. The survey method has been used to gather

Executive Summary The purpose of an executive summary is to summarize a report. Executive summaries are written for executives who most likely do not have time to read the complete document. Therefore, the executive summary must cover the major points and be detailed enough to mirror the content yet concise enough for an executive to understand the substance without reading the entire report. An executive summary differs from an abstract. Readers use an abstract to decide whether to read the complete

Case Comment Case: William Donnelly, Martin Walsh v Procurator Fiscal [2015] HCJAC 35 (HCJAC) Donnelly v Dunn Two Celtic fans who were convicted for singing the “Roll of Honour” under the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act 2012 asp 1 (‘the Act’) have had their Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms appeal rejected. The Facts In 2014 the appellants were convicted for contravening section 1 of the Act for singing

Summary: The story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears begins in a cottage deep in the woods. This house is occupied by a family of bears: mama bear, papa bear and there only child baby bear. Their home is very neat and tidy. In the home, each bear has its own size chair, porridge bowl and bed which are all sized appropriately to the sizing of the bears. Not far away from where the bears house, lived a mischievous beautiful little girl with long soft blonde locks, who had an inquiring mind. Her name

Argument To defeat a motion for summary judgment by the moving party, the non-moving party must show a genuine dispute of material fact to prove the moving party is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. For if no genuine dispute of material fact is shown, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. When a court rules on a summary judgment motion, the court must look positively to the Plaintiff’s case to decide if a genuine dispute

asking for the judgment has the burden of pricing that no genuine issues of material fact exist. IN determining whether to grant summary judgment, the trial court must view the recored in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. In sum, only when the facts are so clear that reasonable minds cannot differ, may a trial court properly enter summary judgment. Summary Judgment for

The nebulous nature of white-collar crime has long been explored, defined and redefined throughout its history by a great number of people specialising in a variety of fields. Despite being first introduced by Edwin Sutherland in 1939, some 78 years prior to today, the problem remains: how should white-collar crime be defined? The fluid nature of white-collar crime itself does not easily lend itself to be defined and thus there exists no universally-accepted definition despite the numerous attempts

Charles will assign Ryan (a man) or Chloe (a woman) to a new advertising account for a national makeup line. Charlotte believes that they both are strong candidates, so she decides to present the two of them to the client for a final decision. The client says that because this work relates to makeup, he would prefer working with Chloe instead of Ryan because she is a woman. Issues 1. Could the client sue the company for sexual discrimination. 2. Does the employer have a good defiance on not prompting

University School of Law INTRODUCTION This case between the plaintiff, Deborah White (Appellee) and the defendants, Patrick Gibbs; and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C., d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern (Appenllants) was the subject of a Summary Judgment Motion filed on behalf of the