Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God Essay

own religion, or not believe anything at all and remain neutral. A man named Jonathan Edwards who was a puritan wanted to spread the catholic faith of god had a sermon on July 8, 1741 in Massachusetts about "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God". In his speech he gave a very detailed description of what would happen if you sinned and go against god. In the first part he talks about hell "That world

lives. For Franklin, who was a deist, believed that everything could be solved by reason and logic. Franklin was much more into the emerging science that was coming about in the world. Edwards, on the other hand, was a Calvinist. He believed in predestination and the mystical powers of God. Everything Edwards did or saw could all be explained by God’s will. Although both men believed in completely different theories, they both lived by a high moral code. Franklin first listed out his highest

The Art of Persuasion A determinate of how effective a piece is can be recognized by how the piece affects the intended audience in the long run. In the sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards and “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr, both authors use several different effective rhetorical methods to convey their messages to the audience. Edwards (one of the best speakers in his time) and King (one of the most influential Civil Rights activists) both

makes for an eye opening colonial period. A group called the Puritans believed that God is the main focus and that every choice you make in life is in God’s will. As another group called the Rationalists believed that people would manage themselves and society without having to rely on others. The Puritans lived in small villages that were grouped around a so called “meeting house” where they would worship God and hold religious services. They were known the be very agricultural and had lots of

being compared are “To my dear loving husband” by Anne Bradstreet, “Upon the burning of our house, July 10th, 1666” by Anne Bradstreet, and lastly “Sinners in the hands of an angry god” by Jonathan Edwards. Edward’s sermons would have been seen by many people as more vivid when he talks about god and his religious beliefs and views. For example “The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked” (126)

thwarted individual advancements. 2. Can Emerson accurately be called a pantheist? Did his radical transcendentalism, with its emphasis on God in nature, obliterate the historical Christian distinction between the moral and the natural? I believe that Emerson can accurately be called somewhat of a pantheist due to his belief that “an all-loving and all-pervading god whose presence in people made them divine and assured their salvation.” Over the years, his viewpoint changed from his traditional Unitarian

around a god or a moral expressed by a god. In "Coyote Finishes His Work" Coyote does all his work

juvenile crime. Some even suggested that the program encouraged criminal behavior in its young participants." (Feinstein 28). In the sermon by Jonathan Edwards, his appeal to fear got many men and women to be converted, but he used examples that made God sound spiteful and threatening. In lines 3-4

to charity. Even though the people whom she gives charity to “insulted the hand that fed them,” she is treated as lower than the lowest in Boston. Despite the insults from the poor of Boston, Hester keeps head strong and is able to make ends meat by selling her sewn goods, which in the begging were marveled at by the angry women. Instead of going back to England, Hester decides to stay in the town that marked her as a sinner because it has been her home for about 2 years, her roots were well placed

The speeches delivered by Jonathan Edwards, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," and Patrick Henry, "Speech to the Virginia Convention," differ in many respects. The speeches had different audiences, were set in different places, and had completely different subjects. Yet these speeches, delivered thirty-four years apart, had similarities. They both used logic, classical images, and restatement, but they varied in the use of emotion and Biblical references. Depending on the topic,and audience