Summaries

'Looking After Children If You Divorce Or Separate - GOV.UK' (Gov.uk, 2016) accessed 11 March 2016 'Mediation On Divorce' (Divorce.co.uk, 2016) accessed 9 March 2016 'Pros And Cons Of Arbitration' (Mayerbrown.com, 2016) accessed 13 March 2016 'Summary Trial | Lexisweb' (Lexisweb.co.uk, 2016) accessed 7 March

Executive Summary The purpose of an executive summary is to summarize a report. Executive summaries are written for executives who most likely do not have time to read the complete document. Therefore, the executive summary must cover the major points and be detailed enough to mirror the content yet concise enough for an executive to understand the substance without reading the entire report. An executive summary differs from an abstract. Readers use an abstract to decide whether to read the complete

This essay will critically reflect on the interventions used in the community to manage offender’s risk by identifying the strengths and weaknesses of communication, between Offender Managers and external agencies. An evaluation will be made of how Offender Managers are able to use feedback from community interventions, to effectively manage an individuals risk throughout supervision sessions and explore different strategies used in order build a relationship and manage compliance throughout an

LAW OF BUSNESS ASSOSIATIONS This essay will discuss obligatory elements in implementing the breach of Section 184 of the Corporations Act 2001 by Mr Clive Palmer. Corporation law is a wide concept of law which comprise of all the legal issues related to Business organisations. With the help of reference to relevant case law this essay will argue that Mr Palmer breached section 184 of the Corporation Act 2001 by not acting in good faith, improper use of position and information and intentional bad

asking for the judgment has the burden of pricing that no genuine issues of material fact exist. IN determining whether to grant summary judgment, the trial court must view the recored in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. In sum, only when the facts are so clear that reasonable minds cannot differ, may a trial court properly enter summary judgment. Summary Judgment for

Charles will assign Ryan (a man) or Chloe (a woman) to a new advertising account for a national makeup line. Charlotte believes that they both are strong candidates, so she decides to present the two of them to the client for a final decision. The client says that because this work relates to makeup, he would prefer working with Chloe instead of Ryan because she is a woman. Issues 1. Could the client sue the company for sexual discrimination. 2. Does the employer have a good defiance on not prompting

SUMMARY Using someone else’s name for a fake profile, misrepresents their identity and can damage a person’s reputation. Tamsen Drake (Plaintiff) values her identity when it comes to her work as an artist. As an artist, Drake creates short animated films for her viewers. Drake does not join the bandwagon of creating a social media profile of her artistic work, or for others to find out information about her. In response to Drake not acquiring a social media profile, Michael Schultz (Defendant)

University School of Law INTRODUCTION This case between the plaintiff, Deborah White (Appellee) and the defendants, Patrick Gibbs; and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C., d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern (Appenllants) was the subject of a Summary Judgment Motion filed on behalf of the

Argument To defeat a motion for summary judgment by the moving party, the non-moving party must show a genuine dispute of material fact to prove the moving party is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. For if no genuine dispute of material fact is shown, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. When a court rules on a summary judgment motion, the court must look positively to the Plaintiff’s case to decide if a genuine dispute

The District Court erred in granting summary judgement for Defendant-Appellee Friendly Grocers by declaring that employers are only required to reasonably accommodate a disabled person through consideration of reassignment. The District Court erred in granting summary judgment for Friendly Grocers. The plain language of the ADA mandates reasonable accommodation requires reassignment to a vacant position. Under the 42 U.S.C § 12112(a), employers have duty to not discriminate against any individuals