Was Brutus Justified In Killing Caesar Essay

Noble Man vs the People In (I,iii,152)“ O, he sits high in the hearts of the people”. This is a quote from the tragic story of Julius Caesar and is relevant to this paper, because we will look at the characters of Brutus and Antony. This paper will go over two specific parts in the story. The speech of noble Brutus and why and how he justified the killing of Caesar. That compared to the orient speech given by one of Caesar's most loyal followers, Antony. The comparison between the two monologues

author’s core values and morals are. So by analyzing Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s core values and moral will shine through. Although there are many characters in Julius Caesar that are vastly different in nature, the way in which Shakespeare highlights any individual points to what he stands for. Starting with Marcus Brutus, Shakespeare focuses the attention on his honor. Brutus sided with Pompey in the civil war with Caesar in which Caesar won. Funk and Wagnall’s New World Encyclopedia report that

Q: Why did you betray Caesar because he might have done something? A: He was a threat and he could have jeopardised the republic of Rome. Q: But you don’t know what he was going to do after he became the emperor, what justified killing him? A: I was and still am convinced that Caesar would have been bad for Rome and its people. Q: Was it hard for you to kill Caesar, your friend? A: Stabbing Caesar was the hardest moment in my lifetime but I knew I was doing it for Rome and that is all that matters

Murder can be defined as the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus and his conspirators murder Caesar and convince the people of Rome that it was a justified act. Mark Antony, a friend of Caesar, seeks justice for his dear friend. In his funeral speech Antony uses rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans that Caesar’s death was unjustified. Through persuasion, Antony uses the strategies: rhetorical questions, verbal irony and the

dictator who’s killing his citizens, then yes, maybe a murder would be necessary. But that’s not always the case. For example, in Julius Caesar, Caesar’s assassination was not justified. The reasons behind it were understandable, but still not justified. Cassius felt that Caesar would become a tyrant and that’s why he had to be killed. Truly, that was a matter of Cassius’s opinion. There wasn’t much proof to back up Cassius’s accusations. There’s not much in the play that really shows Caesar to be tyrant

astonishing play Julius Caesar, Marcus Brutus is known as one of the main protagonists. Brutus can be employed as either a villain or a victim in the play. In my opinion, I see Brutus playing a victim in the play due to his sincere, reasonable, and logical decisions and intentions. He faces major conflicts between his own personal feelings, loyalty to his friend, and loyalty to his country. Roman people seen the worst in Brutus due to his decisions, but little did they know, Brutus didn't even do it for

place are among the many aspects that makes them successful and praiseworthy. In Julius Caesar, readers are presented with characters who take the leadership role in 1st century Rome and are shown the effective or ineffectiveness of their leadership styles. Marcus Brutus and Marc Antony were two rulers who had unique leadership styles that affected actions and events. In Julius Caesar, Marc Antony and Brutus’ leadership styles are shown through their attitudes, beliefs, and intentions, and readers

William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar is a very important one. It is where Brutus reflects about tyranny, power and its nature, and Julius Caesar. He also receives an anonymous letter asking him to “Speak, Strike, Redress!” against Caesar for the good of Rome. Eventually he meets with the rest of the conspirators and they discuss Caesars assassination. The atmosphere in Act 2 Scene 1 is almost a little bit shifty and sly in comparison to the rest of the play. Brutus is thinking out loud in his own

in the instance of Marcus Brutus, a tragic flaw. Reasoning is not characteristically present in Marcus Brutus. Brutus cannot look past his philosophical view of the world and consequently his reasoning is meddled with. This flaw he exhibits will eventually lead to his death. According to Aristotle, a tragic hero must be of noble stature and embody nobility, they cannot be perfect, their downfall must partially be their own fault, their demise is not exclusively justified for their punishment, something

3rd century B.C, flourished in Ancient Rome during the time of Cicero and Caesar. The Stoics stressed personal freedom, virtue, natural law, reason, and self control. Stoic philosophers such as Marcus Aurelius and Seneca claimed a life of discipline and moderation in which one would give up their pleasures and ignore pain. In Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”, Brutus, one of Caesar’s best friends who conspired against him, was determined to be an honorable Stoic. At first sight, Brutus’s attempt to