1. As a board member, what information would you need to make this decision? Which staff members, if any, should be involved in this decision? Given the complex nature of the presenting problem, I may need as many information as possible to decide. First, I would examine the practicalities of the three important suggestion made by Harris who is one of the board members. To this end, it is required to gather best practices of other hospitals and institution in Medicare penalty negotiation so that the hospital consider this as a viable option. Second I would need possible reaction and stance of donors and public on the palliative care services which will determine the suggested fundraising idea to be considered or not. Understanding public …show more content…
Conflict of interest could also be another consequence of selling the PCC unit to a for-profit services provider as both institutions have a different organizational mission. As Wildwoods primary goal is maximizing profit it may compromise some of Memorial hospital values which would damage the hospital long standing good name, services and legitimacy. Considering the possible consequence of selling PCC, I would vote for this option as the last alternative. Primarily I would explore and exhaust the more viable and effective options the hospital has. If the other options do not work out I would vote for selling the unit with preconditions stated in the previous question. 3. What kind of public announcement, if any, should the board make to the press about the investigation? What should be the timing of that announcement? The board should make a strategic and honest public announcement that preserve the future reputation of the hospital. The announcement may need to clearly state the reason for the investigation, the fault made by the hospital and the triggering cause of the fault. Stressing the long years of outstanding services of the hospital and federal government policy gap in Palliative Care could help the hospital not losing its public trust and reputation. Before the whistleblower shares the situation with the press the hospital should announce the issue to the public. Public
Rio Grande Medical Center is a full service not-for-profit acute care hospital with 325 beds. Most of the hospital’s facilities are devoted to inpatient care and emergency services, but a 100,000-square-foot section of the hospital is devoted to outpatient (OP) services. Of the 100,000-square-foot OP section, the OP Clinic uses 80%/80,000-square-feet, and the remaining 20%/20,000-square-feet are used by the Dialysis Center. Increased patient volume at the OP Clinic has created a need for 25% more space than it is currently assigned. Due to its large size and patients’ need to access other departments the decision has been made to move the Dialysis Center to another location, and allow the OP Clinic to
However, the process was unstructured: there were no annual terms for the board members and no formal election process. Bob and Rex should have put in contractual agreements with the board members, which defined their roles and responsibilities on the board. Additionally, they should have put in performance based incentive plans for the board members to further incentivize them. Furthermore, a formal selection plan should have been drafted to select the board in future: how many members, their expertise, tenure, etc. This plan would have been very useful if someone on the board decided to leave or if they would have wanted to add a new
Two experienced nurses had been working at the Winkler county hospital for more than 20 years. In 2009, Ann Mitchell and Vicki Galle became whistleblower in the small town of west Texas. The nurses field an anonymous report to Texas Medical Board regarding to retaliation in the hospital. In the letter, the nurse stated the unsafe practices of Dr. Rolando Arafiles. The nurses were concern about the improper treatment to patient provided by Dr. Arafiles. Since. Dr. Arafiles tried to misuse his connections in order to save himself. Upon receiving the notice from the Texas Medical Board, Dr. Arafiles contacted his good friend and patient-Winkler county sheriff. Dr. Arafiles filed a complaint of harassment by the nurses to the sheriff. The sheriff started investigating the complaint and obtained the copy of the TMB report that clearly identifies that Mitchell and Galle had filed a complaint. Then, the sheriff obtained a search of warrant and seized each nurse’s work computer and found the copy of TMB letter. The nurses were charged with the third degree felony for misuse of official information to cause damage to the physician. However, the TMB disputed with District and County Attorney over the charges asserting that there was no misuse of official information in the state-governing agency. The complaint process allows anyone to report a physician for any unsafe, improper or poor practice including nurses. Since TMB is a government agency there was no violation of Health
My name is _____ and I am currently a consultant of Manger Consulting. Our mission is to provide our expertise in management and staffing services of other organizations I’ll have recommendations on selection decision making for Tanglewood. A detailed selection plan will be generated for the new manager position in Spokane, a panel will be developed for the selection making decision, and guidelines that can be used throughout the chain will be completed.
Beneficence compounded by nurse-physician communication created ethical problems in this case. Mainly, Joanna’s assessment of Mrs. Kelly being ignored by the resident physician and the nursing supervisor. Joanna worked within the scope and standards of practice, she assessed, evaluated, and monitored her patient’s condition. She then reported her findings to the resident twice, and also sought nursing support from her shift supervisor. After Joanna’s first call to the resident, and her continued concern she needed to advocate in a proactive manner. Continuing her assessment of Mrs. Kelly to include palpation and auscultation could have offered additional clinical information enabling her to articulate the problem to the resident and nursing supervisor.
Public not-for-profit hospitals are dependent upon tax-based support for their government sponsors and from patient revenues. Capital budgeting can be financed through government bonds that must be voted upon during elections. Under these circumstances, it is difficult to maintain current equipment and capital
University Hospital is a well known hospital with a level 1 trauma treatment center for the tri-county area of a northwestern state, the hospital enjoys the fact they are known for their promising reputation among healthcare professionals and the public they serve. Jan Adams is an OR supervisor that has been working there for ten years, as a professional she makes surgeons follow protocol as required and enjoys working with trauma patients. One Friday night, which is the busiest day of the week for the trauma department; the unit was notified that a helicopter was on its way with a 42 year old man who had been in a car accident. Shortly after the patient arrived to the trauma center, the resident and other medical staff noted that he was in very bad physical conditions, needed immediate surgery or otherwise he was going to die. The issue was that the on call surgeon had to be present during the surgery and had not yet arrived, but regardless of the matter and protocol they proceeded with medically treating the patient immediately. The concern is that in doing so they violated medical procedures and put the patients safety at risk, this lead to a long list of ethical issues for example, patient well-being, impaired healthcare professional, adherence to professional codes of ethical conduct, adherence to the organization’s mission statement, ethical standards, and values statements, management’s role and responsibility, failure
Great strides have been made to improve end-of-life care through palliative care and hospice programs, but sometimes that’s just not enough. In America, the care that is offered to the elderly and the chronically ill is less than ideal. Statistics show that an
In this scenario the hospital in order to advance the quality of care, could have shared the information about the incident with the nursing personnel. The hospital could provide the best quality of care to the patients and achieve the patients’ satisfaction, by sharing the data. Advancing the quality of care would have positive effect on both patient satisfaction and nursing care. Knowledge of nursing care empowers the nursing staff in such cases. In this scenario the knowledge of pressure ulcers, restraints and patient care is significant. On the other hand the nursing care in this scenario could have been better and the family/patient could have been cared better if the nursing staff had gotten the best patient care knowledge.
Considering the construction of my organization's board, which is comprised of 51 individuals, ranging from the 30 elected representatives from the organization's largest chapters to the 21 business leaders
Evaluate pros and cons of each alternative and suggest a course of action to your CEO.
Ethical principals are the seed of which nursing flourishes from. Many ethical principals were involved and dishonored in this case such as, justice, autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, confidentiality and fidelity (Burkhardt et al., 2014). I believe justice was the main principal involved as the entire ethical predicament was revolved around unjust behavior and treatment of the residents. The residents were treated poorly and given unequal rights as a causation of their illnesses. Autonomy, an essential piece of human rights was also being violated in this ethical dilemma. The residents did not have any choice or independence in their care or how they were being treated. Beneficence and non-maleficence are significant dynamics of this ethical situation, as the health care providers needed to reflect on how they can have the maximum benefit while diminishing possible damage to the residents (Burkhardt et al., 2014). Our actions as nurses should always be beneficent and non maleficent, continuously being kind, compassionate and doing what is in their best interest as well a removing and preventing harm. Confidentiality is a key component of nursing and it was blatantly being violated as the health care
Joanna is an experienced nurse taking care of Mrs. Kelly, who was Joanna’s patient many times in the past for her primary problem which is COPD. This time Mrs. Kelly was admitted with complaints of abdominal pain what was different from her primary diagnoses. Her vital signs were with normal limits and no significant changes from privies results, but for the nurse she looks sick, and Joanna know that something is wrong. She calls the resident doctor, but he tell her to watches and calls back with series changes. Joanna multiple attempts to report that something needs to be done to evaluate the cause of Mrs. Kelly pain was ask to calm down. However nobody took patient symptoms series and the next day patient died.
Top-level executives and key managers are at the helm of the decision-making process with the focal point being selecting the best choice. Selecting the best choices or alternative of choices derive from assessments, interviews, surveys and audits that evaluates the strategic position of the selected choices. Consequently, the chief executive officer at some point should show how the middle-managers, front-line managers, employees and client fit into the decision-making process.
In today’s world the cost for medical attention and health insurance has increased to the point that it may cause a significant amount of strain to a family of a terminally ill patient. The health insurance issues have become large enough to attract the attention of the political world. We are now witnessing how difficult it has been for Health Care