A Beneficial Change That Has Been Proposed For The Welfare

First, if the government were to make welfare eligibility stricter it would impede on the attempts of those below the poverty line trying to find a job. TANF ?can free up additional dollars for work related expenses and other basic needs and thus aid families? efforts to move from welfare to work? (Sard and Daskal). It is needed to help pay for those ?necessities that often accompany employment, such as additional clothing and food costs, child care, and transportation to and from work? (Sard and Daskal). The program does not just hand out money, but provides the aid needed to ?achieve self-sufficiency? through employment (Cohn). Without the additional money for clothing, food costs, child care, and transportation, an individual would not be able to maintain employment and abide by the TANF requirements. It is evident that TANF is necessary for those individuals that live in poverty and are seeking employment. If the requirements were to become stricter, the number of the employed and those living below the poverty line would increase simultaneously.

The current US welfare reform comes with time limit that on benefit together with the work activity requirement (Weil & Finegold 20). An adult can only get federal welfare fund within five years. Moreover, if the beneficiary is not participating in any income generating activity, the assistance that the beneficiary receives from the government should be cut after two years. There is also a research that shows that the welfare reform has recast programs that have low incomes such as health insurance and work support to ensure that the citizens leave the welfare.

America spends an annual amount of 131.9 billion dollars on welfare alone (Department of Commerce). So many facts about welfare are overwhelming, such that over 12,800,000 Americans are on the welfare system. The entire social welfare system is in desperate need of a complete reform. In order for a proper reform to ensue, the people of America must combine efforts with the U.S. government to revitalize the current welfare system. This reform would involve answering two important questions. First, how has today’s welfare system strayed from its original state and secondly, how is the system abused by welfare holders in today’s economy?

There remains a remnant of citizens who honestly cannot do without the welfare system and who abide by the regulation of the welfare system, however, the system unintentionally invites scam artists. The ways of abusing the welfare system continuos to grow. Here are just a few of the examples. Citizens are staying single parents in order to receive aid. Parents view having more children as a gateway to receiving more money from the system. Recipients refuse to search for jobs and report employment in order to continue receiving assistance. People seem to easily make false claims, requesting assistance when they do not need it. Although, there is a set time period for receiving funds many citizens become comfortable and lazy during assistance. The whole purpose of the system is to get citizens through rough economical problems and back to a independent lifestyle without government aid. However, the systems seems to encourage complacency in society and provide fraud play in

The welfare systems are based on the principle of public responsibility on equitable wealth distribution and equality of opportunities to citizens who are unable to afford minimal levels of quality and good life, through provision of universal education programs, health care and subsidised housing. In most of the states, welfare systems are not used in the right manner they are intended to. Although the systems are meant to reduce the poverty level and at least assists individuals to get decent jobs, many recipients develops news ways every year to prolong their dependency in the system. Statistics show that women easily abuse the welfare system by simply having more children each year since this means that more money will come in their mails. Most of the recipients on welfare are able to work

Welfare should not be reformed because it helps single parents. 40 percent of single mothers are poor, 12 million single parents-mother-headed families are poor (Freeman). Welfare can help keep these single parent families stay stable to be an effective families. 12 million single parents mothers headed families can be reduced to less underachieving families with the assistants of welfare. Also with single parents they never had an significant other.

Families receiving welfare are required to find a job in an allotted amount of time, which means they are on welfare a shorter amount of time, making the tax payers’ dollars last longer. The idea of a family cap has also sparked some controversy; some say it is unfair to restrict the

Did you know that around 15 million Americans, and single mother and their children are on welfare? Sometimes working 20 hours is not a possibility for a full time single parent, due to the expenses of babysitters, and schooling. These parents have only one option, which is to apply for welfare to get the assistance required to cover those expenditures so they will be able to work the 20 hours mandatory. Other single parents cannot find a job or have a challenging time keeping them due to mild disabilities and mental health issues( in line citation interview), which are out of their control. This causes worthy families to lose their rights to their children. When that happens numerous children will be taken away from their homes and placed into child protection services. Which could lead to countless future difficulties within the child’s life, when in fact this contradicts the intentions of the welfare reform act. Even though this problem can be completely avoided if benefits were not cut or denied. Although, the main idea of the welfare reform act is to insure the well-being of young children, the loss of benefits could leave many children poverty stricken. Which, ironically is what Clinton and others involved were trying to

For this paper, I decided to find a news article, describe the poverty intervention technique that the article focuses on, describe the new reform the article states to be following, describe its strengths and weaknesses, and describe my prognosis of its benefit or failure. The general area of poverty intervention this article goes into is that of the welfare system. Welfare is a form of financial support provided by the government to people in poverty to assist them. While these welfare programs started out as a way to help people as best as possible, it has taken a turn in recent years. In the past, the welfare program the welfare program helped women, mothers and especially single mothers, to stay out of the labor market by providing these

In 1935, Franklin Roosevelt signed into law the Social Security Act which, among other things, provided for the financial, medical, and material needs of the poor (Komisar 125,128). Since then, there have many additions and reforms to the bill, none of which has served to quell the controversy surrounding the effectiveness of the welfare system in the United States. The main concerns of the distribution of welfare dollars and resources can be answered by the questions ?Who gets assistance?? and ?How much do they receive??. The U.S. welfare system is administered by the Department of Health and Human Services, which attempts to answer these questions through a system of minimum incomes, government-calculated poverty levels, number of children, health problems, and many other criteria. This complicated system leads to one of the critiques of the welfare system?that it is too large and inefficient. President Lyndon Johnson declared a ?War on Poverty? in 1964 designed to alleviate the burden of the poor and established the Food Stamp program the next year (Patterson 139). In 1996, a major welfare reform bill was passed that placed time limits on welfare assistance, required able participants to actively seek employment, and implemented additional services for the needy (Patterson 217).

the unemployed mother who is receiving food stamps and monthly social security unemployment benefits as a serious problem to the welfare system. The program which

“Psalms 30:6 when I felt secure I said, I will never be shaken” (The Holy Bible). The goal of welfare is to help individuals afford the basic necessities of life to help them be able to bounce back on their feet. However, it has become apparent that throughout the generations people have become too comfortable and secure being on welfare, and thus are not striving for self-sufficiency to instead just lounge around. As with all government run programs, there is a budget for welfare services, and with more and more people applying for welfare and fewer returning to self-sufficiency, there is simply not enough money to go around. Putting time limits on welfare is a topic that has been debated for

United States Government Welfare began in the 1930’s during the Great Depression. Franklin D. Roosevelt thought of this system as an aid for low-income families whose men were off to war, or injured while at war. The welfare system proved to be beneficial early on by giving families temporary aid, just enough to help them accommodate their family’s needs. Fast forward almost 90 years, and it has become apparent that this one once helpful system, has become flawed. Welfare itself and the ideologies it stands on, contains decent fundamentals; furthermore, this system of aid needs only to be reformed to better meet the needs of today’s society.

If a time limit is set people are less likely to become dependent on government for assistance. I would set mandatory job and interview training sessions. These sessions would teach welfare recipients how to search and obtain jobs. A program such as this one would free thousands of recipients from government dependency. I would expand drug testing, but not to withhold welfare from needy families. If drug testing was implemented then it would help find and treat drug abusers. If I was able to find the underlying issue for why welfare recipients are unable or unwilling to work, which may be cause by drug dependency furthermore, getting them help might enhance their quality of life and economic standing. I would expand base on income child care, so parent with young children can search and obtain jobs. I see a lot of you high school age mother who drop out of school because they cannot afford child care. This would give them the option of going to school or get a job. I would also partner with the education systems, such as high schools and colleges to help the welfare recipients who want to further their

Truly, the best possible situation is to modify the welfare system, in order to properly ensure the cooperation of the individual who employs welfare’s benefits. Doing so, can to some extent promote the ideas of individualism in order to reduce the culture of dependency, while remaining true to the basic concept of a welfare state. One possible form of adapting the welfare system is to promote job seeking, requiring the individual to meet a certain quota of job applications, and interviews over a given time period, in order to ensure the individual is actively searching for a job, rather than relying solely on their benefits. This embraces the individualist ideas presented by the source, and reduces the dependency of the individual upon the welfare state. Another possible modification is the reduction of the amount of consecutive time one can spend on the benefits of the welfare system, barring recession. This modification would work hand in hand with the first modification to ensure the individual is adequately attempting to rejoin the workforce. However, in a recession, which would be identified by the government, there would be increased latitude extended to the individual in the regard of job seeking. This also embraces some individual characteristics, while maintaining the welfare system for the individual’s