preview

A Comparison Peter Shaffer's Equus and Albert Camus's The Stranger

Good Essays

The ways in which truths are presented to external audiences concerning outside characters display not only a good judgment of character on the presenter, but furthermore, the often insignificant nature of whom the presenter is talking about, even if the insignificance presented is accidental. Both Peter Shaffer’s Equus and Albert Camus’ The Stranger approach different ways in presenting the truths of Alan Strang and Meursault to the audience/jury, but one thing remains clear; intentional or unintentional manipulation of these characters leads to the eternal distrust of the reliability of their presenters, Martin Dysart and the members of the law.
Through Dysart’s self-diagnosis given throughout Equus, Shaffer directly conflicts with …show more content…

Though fascinated with Alan, as the book progresses, it strays from focus on Alan to Dysart, and more light is shone on Dysart’s own problems. Shaffer gives Dysart numerous monologues, not concerning Alan, but rather, problems and events he has experienced in his own life, though Alan has influenced these events. In his opening monologue, Dysart “keep[s] thinking about the horse! Not the boy: the horse” (Shaffer 9). Shaffer immediately confronts with Dysart’s self-centered nature, for from the beginning, Dysart’s mind would rather think about an animal. Nevertheless, the manipulation of Alan is unintentional, for Dysart does not identify with Alan in order to better himself, but rather to bring to light problems within himself, displaying further his own selfish nature. In contrast with The Stranger, the truth is brought out and presented to its entirety to the audience, but Alan never receives a true diagnosis. It remains up to the reader to decide what went wrong with Alan, and what caused him to stake out the eyes of the horses. On the other hand, all kinds of faults are presented within Dysart, like his impotence, or his inability to find something to become passionate about. Dysart begins to cross the line when asking Alan questions concerning the events leading up to the staking of the horses eyes, to the point of identification with Alan, and eventually, his own demise. His prying continues until he finds himself

Get Access