Henrik Ibsen 's A Doll 's House is a work of literature genius. This three-act play involves many literary technics that are undermined by the average reader such as the fact that the plot shows the main characters Torvald and his wife Nora live the "perfect life." An ironic paradox based around the fact that Nora and Torvald’s relationship is the complete opposite of perfect. Also, bringing upon a conflict as well, appearance versus reality. These little hidden meanings within stories are what are undermined such as foils, characters that are used to develop a character further. Such as Torvald Helmer for Nils Krogstad and Nora Helmer also for Nils Krogstad. These foils help in showing the theme, the sacrificial roles of women. By …show more content…
On the other hand, Krogstad goes completely irrational, begins committing a crime and blackmailing Nora instead of taking rational routes. Although Krogstad uses blackmail as a way to keep his job it still was not a sound way to handle his stresses. Another difference and quite the obvious is how each of them treats women. Torvald treats Nora like a possession rather than a partner, feeling like she is entitled to him. On the other hand, Krogstad lost his previous wife, the mother of his children. Then Linde comes and gets him to divert his anger away from Nora, stops the blackmail, and gains a lover. Krogstad changes his view on everything incredibly fast with the introduction of his and Linde 's new love. Krogstad, as the listener knows that he is selfish but does not want to be thrown into the pit of debt he once was and in spite of rage does not seem to care about the consequences of his actions. Nora, on the other hand, cannot go to Torvald and inform him of the terrible things that Krogstad is committing. However, later in the play Torvald opens a blackmail letter from Krogstad to Nora and learns everything, the debt, the consistent blackmail, and the secrets. This where Torvald’s selfishness peaks. His actions drive Nora to leave, the last of the play has Torvald saying this, "Nora! Nora! Empty! She is gone. The most wonderful thing of all." (Ibsen) Here again, we see Torvald somewhat looking at Nora like a doll.
In Henrik Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House, pointedly captures the reality of the Victorian Era within the play. Nora Helmer, the protagonist of the story, represents the typical women in society during that era. The audience’s first impression of Nora is a money obsessed, childish, obedient house wife to her husband, Torvald Helmer. However, as the play progresses one can see that Nora is far from being that typical ideal trophy wife, she is an impulsive liar who goes against society’s norm to be whom and what she wants. Her husband is illustrated as the stereotypical man during the 19th century, as he is the dominate breadwinner of the family, who too deserts his position as the play reaches its end. A key theme that is brought to light in A
As Torvald and Nora continue to immerse in conversation about Krogstad, Torvald speaks of the guilt that Krogstad must go through with lying and infidelity while surrounded by children. Torvald says "because that kind of atmosphere of lies infects the whole life of a home. Every breath the children take in is filled with the germs of some degenerate" (Ibsen, 70). Torvald had heard all the rumors that go around about Krogstad and had these preconceived notions which made it extremely difficult to respect him. He also states, " Every lawyer is quite familiar with is. And still, this Krogstad's been going home year in and year out, poisoning his own children with lies and pretenses; that's why I call him morally lost" (Ibsen, 70). The significance
Krogstad victimizes Nora in a very different way than her husband and father. Krogstad does not use his position of dominance as a man to control her. Instead he uses blackmail to manipulate Nora to his will. As we examine her situation Nora seems more a victim of circumstance here than of the not so evil will of her blackmailer.
Now that Krogstad is fired from the bank, He is blackmailing Nora for her getting a loan through signing her dying father’s signature. When Torvald finds out about Nora’s crime, She expect sympathy from Torvald about her dilemma because he said to her that he fantasizes about risking his life to save Nora’s. “Do you know, Nora, I have often wished that you might be threatened by some great danger, so that I might risk my life’s blood, and everything, for your sake” (Ibsen, 833). Once given the opportunity, however; Torvald shows no intention of sacrificing his life or anything for Nora, thinking only about his appearances. His selfishness becomes
Nora begins to take offence to the words of Torvald. He refers to her as his most “prized possession”, and continues to say that he often imagines her as though she is his mistress, and she is a temptress. Nora continues to get offended, telling Torvald she doesn’t want any of this. Nora begins
In this initial interaction between Nora and Krogstad, the main conflict is introduced and the story is in motion.
However, Nora does eventually realize that she has been treated like a child all her life and has been denied the right to think and act the way she wishes. When Torvald does not immediately offer to help Nora after Krogstad threatens to expose her, Nora realizes that there is a problem. By waiting until after he discovers that his social status will suffer no harm, Torvald reveals his true
When Krogstad threatens to expose the truth, Nora must use her craftiness to distract Torvald and sway him into letting Krogstad keep his job. Unfortunately, she is not able to change his mind, but she does succeed in diverting his suspicions of her motives. She praises him and lulls him into a false sense of security by telling him that "[n]o one has such good taste as [he has]" and then goes on to ask him if he could "take [her] in hand and decide what [she is] to go as" for the dance. She confesses to him that she "can't do anything without [him] to help [her]". These statements lead him to believe that he is the one to "rescue" her, when it is in fact Nora who is trying to rescue him from dishonour. Later on, when Krogstad puts a letter in Torvald's mail, explaining everything that Nora has done, Nora uses her charms once more. She pretends that she has forgotten the tarantella so that Torvald will spend all his time with her and think nothing of the mail that awaits him. Nora truly believes that by deceiving her husband, she is protecting him from worry. Because of Nora's deception, the person that Torvald believes her to be is quite different from the person she actually is. He believes that she is a "spendthrift," infatuated by expensive things when in reality, she saves her money to pay back Krogstad and buys cheap clothing and gifts. Torvald
He abides by traditional gender roles and believes that a man must provide for, protect and guide his wife. His explanation for listening to Nora’s input regarding Krogstad keeping his job at the office was that it would make him, “a laughing stock before the entire staff “. This shows that he prioritizes how people view him over what his wife’s desires. Torvald further shows his desire for society to respect him when he discovered Nora committed a crime. He says, “The thing has to be hushed up at any cost…
Furthermore, Ibsen uses the conversation between Nora and Krogstad to illuminate the theme of deceit. Deceit is the central theme of the play with the spiral of devious events undertaken by Nora becoming at catalyst for her awakening. The theme is prominently illuminated during the first conversation between Nora and Krogstad with it being revealed Krogstad lent Nora the money she sought to save Torvalds life, ‘you came to me to borrow two hundred and fifty pounds.’ This heightens the climax as the reveal of Nora’s loan juxtaposes Torvalds negative values on borrowing money, ‘No debts! Never borrow! A home that is founded on debts and borrowing can never be a place of freedom and beauty.’ However, even though Nora disobeyed Torvalds central rule of borrowing money, her act of deceit was committed for ‘moral’ reasons as she had to save his life provoking the audience to
On the other hand we have Krogstad, he also cares a lot about his reputation at the bank but what's different compared to Torvald’s views is that he shows respect toward others and not just himself. Henrik Ibsen writes this stating on how Krogstad relies on a healthy income and pay, “Do not do anything foolish. When Helmer has had my letter, I shall expect a message from him. And be sure you remember that it is your husband himself who has forced me into such ways as this again.” Krogstad goes against his heart even though he has sympathy for Nora because he doesn't want to ruin his reputation. The one thing Krogstad has that Torvald doesn’t is respect toward others. In the play he talks to Nora and say’s that he has sympathy for her. Krogstad also desires his respect toward his family unlike Torvald where he just desires his respect for his selfishness. I believe the reason Henrik Ibsen created these two characters was to help us learn about why we should treat everyone with respect and don’t desire your reputation for selfish
Henrik Ibsen’s “A Doll’s House” is a play about a young wife and her husband. Nora and Helmer seem to be madly in love with one another and very happy with their lives together. Yet the conflict comes into this show when Nora brags to her friend Ms. Linde about how she had forged her father’s name to borrow money to save her husband’s life and how she had been secretly paying off this debt. Helmer finds out about this crime and is furious, until he finds that no one will ever know about it. This entire conflict is written to bring to light the ridiculous social expectations demanded of both women and men. Ibsen expertly leads the audience into accepting that these social expectations are foolish and wrong. The audience
keeps his place in the acting dollhouse because he has hidden feelings like Nora’s that will
In “A Doll’s House,” Ibsen presents us with the drama of Torvald and Nora Helmer, a husband and wife who have been married for eight years and whose lives are controlled by the society in which they live. Their relationship, although seemingly happy, is marred by the constraints of social attitudes around them and their perceived gender roles. Creating even more conflict is the thin veil of deceit between them, which inevitably breaks them apart.
Krogstad feels threatened by her influence because she can be the pivotal deciding factor in whether or not he keeps his job. Nevertheless, Krogstad tries to turn her influence to benefit himself by threatening to reveal her crime if she does not help him to keep his job. This backfires on Krogstad when two women, Nora and Mrs. Linde, manipulate Krogstad into feeling obstinate and therefore he promises never to tell anyone of what Nora has done. Nora's power helped her to remain protected throughout the entire play.