2014063476 October 6, 2016 3POLITICALSCIENCE2 Mr. Ronald M. Castillo, M.A. Not for Kids Kind of Seesaw: A Proposal to Solving Conflicts in The Kashmir Region Rubric for Evaluating Paper in International Relations = Total Score [ ] / 70 pts 10 pts. 8 pts. 5 pts. 3 pts. Clarity of Discussion Manuscript content is organized, clearly and directly conveyed ideas in the jargon of the discipline. Manuscript content had 1-2 flaws in organization, clarity and/or directly conveying ideas in the jargon of the discipline. Manuscript content had 3-4 flaws in organization, clarity and/or directly conveying ideas in the jargon of the discipline. Manuscript content had 5 or more flaws in organization, clarity and/or directly conveying ideas in the jargon of the discipline. Relevance of Thesis Thesis: 1) practically addresses an issue that 2) has been properly introduced as currently relevant in the field of IR. (Both satisfied) Thesis: 1) practically addresses an issue that 2) has been properly introduced as currently relevant in the field of IR. (1 unclear) Thesis: 1) practically addresses an issue that 2) has been properly introduced as currently relevant in the field of IR. (1 missing) The introduction is an information dump about the topic. Quality of Model x2 Model has substantial theoretical basis and is clearly illustrated with easily understandable parts. Model has substantial theoretical basis but has 1-2 unclear parts illustrated with causing
7. In the concluding paragraph, you start with the thesis and broaden the subject to relate it to more generalized statements.
Content is disorganized and writing has numerous grammar, spelling, or syntax errors and APA formatting errors. Spell check and grammar check are not obvious. More than 11 errors noted.
Critically evaluate the weaknesses/limitations/problems of the article. Is the work thorough? Fair? Clear? Convincing?
2b) The authors provided the reader a lot of information on the topic. Each topic was very well explored. A lot of different information on different but similar studies. The authors seemed very knowledgeable on the topic. This article lacked a few things. A clear research question and a hypothesis. The paragraphs were not clear and consist, I felt that I had to dig to get certain information. The paper was very wordy, which made me have a hard time understanding the substance.
Welcome to WritePoint, the automated review system that recognizes errors most commonly made by university students in academic essays. The system embeds comments into your paper and suggests possible changes in grammar and style. Please evaluate each comment carefully to ensure that the suggested change is appropriate for your paper, but remember that your instructor's preferences for style and format prevail. You will also need to review your own citations and references since WritePoint capability in this area is limited. Thank you for using WritePoint.
Did you find any research articles on which you could perform a critique? Describe the type of article and add the reference to the article. (2 pts)
The paragraphs are also very choppy and need to be revised to flow much better.
Welcome to WritePoint, the automated review system that recognizes errors most commonly made by university students in academic essays. The system embeds comments into your paper and suggests possible changes in grammar and style. Please evaluate each comment carefully to ensure that the suggested change is appropriate for your paper, but remember that your instructor's preferences for style and format prevail. You will also need to review your own citations and references since WritePoint capability in this area is limited. Thank you for using WritePoint.
I am convinced that the author has done a superb job in the presentation of his thesis
The paper starts off with an introduction, which then leads to a thesis, which is followed by additional information and a conclusion. The overall view and layout of the article are portrayed in a manner that is appealing to the eye. However, the paper does have its faults in the organization and in context to the overall subject manner. For example, Peter A. Coclanis and Stanley L. Engerman do not claim their thesis until approximately halfway through the entire article. The two authors provide a wide area of background information to support their thesis, but a part of it is not really supportive and is what causes their thesis to be pushed so far into the article.
Using the search engines and inclusion criteria, five appropriate papers were chosen. Within these papers a number of themes were noted. These themes were then chosen to be explored within the discussion section.
I most recently submitted an assignment with formatting and grammatical errors. The formatting errors can be corrected by carefully reviewing the Bryant Stratton APA guide. The grammatical errors can be avoided by re-reading and using spell checker to make sure words are spelled correctly.
Time to put it down and let a fresh pair of eyes bring life to your paper! Content is important. Like it or not, the way a paper looks affects the way others judge it. When you’ve worked hard to develop and present your ideas, you don’t want careless errors distracting your reader from what you have to say. It’s worth letting me help you to make the best impression.
The most frequent errors I identified were formatting issues, citation issues and organization of content. The formatting issues stemmed from poor organization of the content which lacked headings, paragraph indentations, as well as margin and spacing errors. These errors contrast the APA style which according to Walden University is, “a set of standards that writers in the social sciences follow to create consistency throughout publications. These rules address crediting sources, document formatting and writing style and organization,” Walden University (Producer). (2014a) The formatting issues identified in Michael’s paper that are in violation of the proper document formatting Walden addresses are issues with margins, typefaces, headings
In what ways did your work meet the standards for this assignment? In what ways did it not meet those standards?