Back in the day almost everyone viewed woman to be the person who cleans, cooks, has children, and obeys her husband. Even woman themselves had this view hammered into their minds at such a young age, the views that women are inferior to men. This stigma of woman can be found traced throughout Virginia Woolf’s essay of two meals, a meal for men and a meal for women at a college. She uses numerous composition techniques and effectively disperses them throughout her narrative. By doing so, she accurately demonstrates her views on society’s stigma of a woman's role in an eloquent manner.
The theme for honour and fidelity apply for both men and women in Shakespeare’s play ‘much ado about nothing’. Honour and fidelity is represented very differently for men and women as it would have been for the people in Elizabethan times. In this first section of the essay, I will be exploring double standards and Shakespeare’s awareness of the double standards between sexes and his feminist approach, the differences of honour and fidelity for men and women and upper class and lower class comparisons.
Using the example of Judith, Shakespeare’s imaginary sister, Woolf depicts this character as how society discriminated against women. Judith, a woman, was just as talented as her brother, William Shakespeare, though had to write in secret. A man’s talent was highly recognized in
Woolf speaks of the “religious importance” (p. 51) of chastity in women’s lives in the excerpt from A Room of One’s Own. She cites the work of Charlotte Brontë, Jane Austen, and George Eliot as evidence that women themselves have accepted the convention of anonymity for women and sought to “veil themselves” (p. 52) when writing, and that the act of writing produces “inner strife” (p. 52). This is also in the character of ophelia when Polonius, too, speaks of how the rules of chastity are different for men than for women: “For Lord Hamlet, / Believe so much in him that he is young, / And with a larger tether may he walk / Than may be given you” (Act 1.3, lines 132–135), in other words, Hamlet by his birth as a prince and a man has a longer “tether” (line 134) or rope to roam in the world of love; whereas Ophelia’s rope of societal norms is short; she cannot move beyond the rules of chastity for women. This further shows the similarities between woolf’s text and the character of ophelia and how the relationship between the two have great central ideas.
Today the equality between men and woman is closer then it ever has before in history, with women CEO’s and stay at home dads. This happened because of the strong woman in history fighting for the same rights as man, private property, creative freedom, and the power to use their intellect. Virginia Woolf is one of those ladies arguing that, “a woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction." She believes that women are locked in some sort of intellectual prison and not being able to have money or privacy keeps them locked, unable to blossom intellectually.
Wolf makes many claims and gives many examples to display how the opinions of woman were never valued and to this day still are not. In page 27 Wolf claims that women do not write about men but men writes about women. In page 29 as she ponders Samuel Butlers saying that “Wise men never say what they think about women” she came to the conclusion that “Wise man never say anything else apparently”. James claims “there is no greater “punishment” that “could be devised. Were such a thing physically possible, than that one should be turned loose in society and remained absolutely unnoticed by all the members of thereof” (James p. 46). Yet this is exactly what Wolf describes to be the state in which women lived in for centuries and so, how could one come to have greatness and fame of Shakespeare if no one ever read or listened to what was written or created by the great sister of
As Mary tries to gather more information to support her argument on the topic of women and fiction, she runs into Professor Von X, the author of a book on the mental, moral, and physical inferiority of women. In the passage from A Room of One’s Own, Virginia Woolf utilizes figurative language, such as metaphor, and historical figures to assert that men need women to be inferior in order to maintain their own sense of superiority.
In the excerpt from “A Room of One’s Own,” by Virginia Wolf, she creates a distinction between women portrayed in fiction and their experiences in reality.
An important piece of literature that covers the topic of feminism is entitled, "Working For Judith Shakespeare: A Study In Feminism,” by Varley and Erdman. They discuss their thoughts on women writers and how women write against a society that did not want women to write. In addition they share Virginia Woolf’s thoughts on how feminism plays into a female writer. She states that oppressed women will write about themselves instead of their characters and that doing this will overshadow the importance of the story by the need to voice their oppression. They define feminism as “the belief in the right of women to have equal status with men as we live and participate in the world together” (Varley and Erdman). Furthermore, Varley and Erdman share
In Virginia Woolf’s feminist essay “A Room of One’s Own,” Woolf argues that “a woman must have money and a room of her own” (16) if she is to write fiction of any merit. The point as she develops it is a perceptive one, and far more layered and various in its implications than it might at first seem. But I wonder if perhaps Woolf did not really tap the full power of her thesis. She recognized the necessity of the writer’s financial independence to the birth of great writing, but she failed to discover the true relationship to great writing of another freedom; for just as economic freedom allows one to inhabit a physical space---a room of one’s own---so does mental freedom allow one to inhabit one’s own mind and body “incandescent and
The essay “What if Shakespeare Had Had a Sister? “by Virginia Woolf, an excerpt in 50 Essays: A Portable Anthology Fourth Edition by Samuel Cohen, was originally a component of her book, A Room of One’s Own which was published in 1929. Virginia Woolf, who was born in London in 1882, is one of the most prominent writers in history. As a modernist and feminist, she is known for several of her masterpieces. Her book, A Room of One’s Own, was written based off two lectures she gave dealing with women and the role they played in writing and literature. She believed it was impossible, completely and entirely, for any woman to have written the plays of Shakespeare in the age of Shakespeare.
In her essay “In Search of a Room of One’s Own” Virginia Woolf used Shakespeare’s sister as a metaphor to explain the position of women in Elizabethan era. Since author finds it difficult to find any trace of women in the Elizabethan era, she creates a fictional character through imagination, and to feel situations that the women in Elizabethan society would have had to go through. Woolf compares fiction to a “spider’s web” (520) that permeates life “at all four corners” (520). Through this metaphor, she personifies narratives of women suffering as a spider’s web that cling to our material reality. For Woolf, our lived stories are a part of this web which can be changed, destroyed or, re-spin with our imagination. In my paper, I argue that Wolfe uses the metaphor of a spider’s web as a heuristic device to make a case for literacy analysis and fiction as tools for exercising narrative agency and challenging stories that deny us representation in this world. To illustrate this, she creates an imaginative character, named Judith Shakespeare, to surface the gender inequality in the Elizabethan era. For this purpose, she not only writes a new chapter of Elizabethan history that centers the perspective of the women, but she also gives voice to women of that era who, like Judith her main character, were silenced and delegitimized by the spider’s web of their time.
Throughout history, female artists have not been strangers to harsh criticism regarding their artistic works. Some female artists are fortunate to even receive such criticism; many have not achieved success in sharing their works with the world. In Virgina Woolf’s third chapter of her essay “A Room of One’s Own,” Woolf addresses the plight of the woman writer, specifically during the Elizabethan time period of England. Woolf helps the reader appreciate her view on how stifling and difficult this time period was for women and how what little creativity emerged would have been distorted in some way. Through a number of claims, examples and other literary techniques, Woolf is able to
“For most of history, Anonymous was a woman,” Virginia Woolf once boldly stated. Though she was from a privileged background and was well educated, Woolf still felt she was faced with the oppression that women have been treated with for as far as history goes back. Her education allowed her to explore the works of the most celebrated authors, but one who she had a long and complicated relationship with was the Bard of Avon himself, William Shakespeare. As one of the most highly regarded and well studied authors of all time, Shakespeare has been elevated from mere playwright to a pillar of the British Empire, instrumental to the institutions that boasted British superiority. It is evident throughout Woolf’s writing that Shakespeare’s works were highly influential. Her novels frequently allude to his plays, most notably Orlando, Mrs. Dalloway, and also in her famous essay, A Room of One’s Own. Though Woolf admires Shakespeare’s androgyny (specifically in A Room of One’s Own), she also makes the case that his treatment of female characters does not allow for the women to be three-dimensional, therefore leaving them flat and lacking in depth. Even though for the most part Woolf’s assertion is correct, there are several examples in Shakespeare’s plays that suggest otherwise, namely in the play Othello. Additionally, in a similar vain, one could explore Shakespeare’s treatment of other minority groups in his works, such as Jews and anyone who is not English. Though it is easy to
People may find Woolf's theories outdated; the statement "For genius like Shakespeare's is not born among laboring, uneducated, servile people" would be met with controversy if published today (Woolf 46). It is important to remember that Woolf believes that money and personal independence go hand in hand with freedom of thought, and that poverty and its attendant troubles prevent such thought. She admits that brilliance can emerge from low working classes but is rare. Woolf is clearly at odds with any kind of "protest" literature, feeling that it reduces the "incandescent" talent of the writer (Woolf 56).