preview

Abolishing The Death Penalty

Decent Essays

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is a practice done by governments where a person is put to death for breaking certain laws. The death penalty has been used since ancient times as a way to punish lawbreakers and deter others from committing the same crime. As modern times approached, however, there have been large debates within countries as to whether or not they should continue using the death penalty or completely abolish the practice. People all over the world argue about if it is a good way to punish to terrible criminals and stops others from committing horrible crimes, or if it is a practice that can cause innocent people to wrongly be sentenced to death and enforces the prejudiced police system. As of December 2017, …show more content…

Race plays such a big role in who is arrested, how police force is used, and also in who gets the death penalty. Statistics show that police and juries favor white criminals over those of color. According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), “People of color have accounted for a disproportionate 43% of total executions since 1976 and 55% of those currently awaiting execution,” (Race and the Death Penalty). The reason why this is a surprising fact is because the U.S. Census Bureau states only twenty-three percent of America’s population is not white (QuickFacts United States). The races of less than one-quarter of our population make up over half of the population on death row and close to half of the people who have been executed in the past forty-two years. This clearly shows a bias in our justice system. Not only are white criminals favored, white victims are too. The Death Penalty Information Center released that, “Over 75% of the murder victims in cases resulting in an execution were white, even though nationally only 50% of murder victims generally are white,” (Facts About the Death Penalty). That means someone is more likely to receive a lighter punishment if their victim is a person of color rather than a white person. Furthermore, the ACLU published, “As of October 2002, 12 people have been executed where the defendant was white and the murder …show more content…

However, the phrase “worst of the worst” does not have a set definition and people’s opinions on what is evil vary greatly from person to person. One article about the morality of capital punishment expresses, “Depending on how you think about death...you might oppose the death penalty on the grounds that it is disproportionately harsh – perhaps you think that no matter what someone has done, she does not deserve to die for it,” (Howard). Both sides are trying to argue that their stance is morally just because everyone has a different set of morals, so it is not best to use morals as the basis for their discussions. Additionally, states that use the death penalty do not have strict regulations on what the “worst of the worst” really is, which leads to more changes in what types of crimes warrant the death penalty, which then can lead to more executions. For example, Arizona’s history with the death penalty shows how our lack of understanding of what types of people should be sentenced to death can lead to the practice being applied arbitrarily. In 1973, Arizona adopted a law which states that prosecutors had to prove that a criminal did one of six aggravating factors do warrant them being sentenced to death. Since then though, Arizona has more than doubled their number of factors to fourteen (Tribe). This is a problem known as “aggravator creep” and it is where if a change or exception is made, more and more will

Get Access