Couple of recorded contentions are more emotional than that between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas. Beside their physical contrasts, the two men were very comparative. Both were transients to Illinois, both were independent men, and both conceded to the majority of the issues of the day, aside from bondage. Their physical contrasts, be that as it may, were self-evident. Lincoln had no yearning to awe individuals by his appearance. His garments were dusty and looked as though they had not been pressed. His jacket was washed-out and short at the sleeves, and his wrinkled face gave a sentiment solemnity, if not despairing. Douglas, then again, thick-set and short, dressed impeccably. He seemed self-assured and secure. As one spectator depicted him, "[Douglas' stride] was the stroll of a man who knew where he was and how to arrive." …show more content…
Douglas, when warmed to a subject, let words surge out in an unbroken stream. Lincoln, nonetheless, talked gradually and painstakingly, picking each of his words. Mindfully, Lincoln talked with no detectable faltering, however he did not have the simplicity and ease of Douglas. Douglas, in addition, rushed to answer an inquiry, while Lincoln obliged time to assemble his musings. As indicated by a columnist for a Chicago daily paper, "[Lincoln] never neglected to discover his balance and keep up it solidly when he discovered it." Lincoln, in any case, had two one of a kind focal points amid the civil arguments. To begin with, he was the underdog when contrasted with Douglas' national notoriety, making it less demanding for Lincoln to engage people in general's sensitivity. Second, his discourses and conclusions were crisp, though Douglas had as of now conveyed his thoughts ordinarily some time recently. Douglas' crusade was additionally preferred sorted out and better financed over
In the book, The Radical and the Republican, was a very interesting, informative read. It made me actually picture myself during that era, and feel how the main people in the book were so passionate about slavery. It focused on the attitudes and the political stand points of Abraham Lincoln, and Frederick Douglass, towards the issue on slavery and the emancipation of slaves. James Oake’s portrayal of both men was extremely positive. He went into detail about their politics and their reasons behind their public positions, regarding slavery. “Their minds worked differently. Though they both hated slavery, they both hated it in different ways and not always for the same reasons. Their
The Narrative of The Life of Frederick Douglass and Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address are different, as Douglass uses irony, a strong appeal to pathos, and a generalization of his experience, while Lincoln uses religious allusions to unify, non accusatory diction, as to not assign blame for the war, and a generally optimistic tone to unify the country and look towards the future. They are similar as they both appeal to ethos to establish their own credibility, and pathos appeal to certain emotions.
Beginning with building his credibility, Lincoln uses compassionate and relatable language in his speech to engage the audience in his purpose to show the nation’s future. He
Malcom X once said, “Education is the passport to the future, for tomorrow belongs to those who prepare for it today.” This quotation means that education is an important thing, and we should prepare for our future. Fredrick Douglass and Malcom X are two different men who write similar aspects. Fredrick Douglass is a slave, and Malcom X is a criminal, both were deprived of obtaining a higher sense of education. They are two activists who grew up to realize the importance of an education, in reading and writing. In Frederick Douglas’s essay “Learning to Read and Write” and Malcolm’s “Learning to Read” one can compare and contrast the analysis both essays.
Lincoln’s speech also contains a balanced syntax to highlight the idea of a united and balanced nation by using a combination of long and shot sentences in his speech. An example of a long sentence would be one like, “While the Inaugural Address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war, seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation”, and an example of a short sentence would be one like the following: “All dreaded it, all sought to avert it.” The
In spite of the fact that Sherman Alexie, Plato,Frederick Douglass, and Malcolm x, the four experienced childhood in various eras, in various conditions, and at last in various universes. The trio confronted distinctive battles and had diverse victories, yet at last they weren't generally all that extraordinary. In spite of the fact that they experienced childhood in various circumstances they both had similar perspectives on the significance of a training. The considered training to be opportunity and as a feeling of self-esteem and however they accomplished their instruction in various ways they both had a solid will and a solid feeling of self-inspiration.
Throughout America’s history, many influential and historical figures have given significant speeches to impact views of the people. For example, Frederick Douglass and Charles Langston are powerful speakers who try to convince the white community that slavery should be abolished. Of the two distinctive speakers, Douglass is more persuasive and outspoken than Langston. As a former slave, Douglass uses his tragic experiences to bring life and passion into his words. While Langston addresses his audience in a mild manner, Douglass seems to be more adamant and strong in his beliefs and views. Even though they approach their audiences differently, both touch upon a few similar
This book was a view on slavery between during the Civil War. It shows the different views of the Republican Party of Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. These two had very different views at first, but then learned to adapt to each other and eventually became great friends.
In his speech, Lincoln used a passionate and inclusive tone to give the impression that they were all equal and were at risk of losing the same things. This could inspire a feeling of unity between Lincoln and the audience. “…devoted altogether to saving the Union…” (paragraph 2). In this statement, Lincoln used both diction and sentence structure to impact his audience. He used emotionally charged words such as “devoted” and “saving” to express a sense of passion. He also used long sentences that would reiterate similar ideas to help get his point across. “…to bind up the nation’s wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan…” (paragraph 4). In this part of his address, Lincoln uses imagery, facts, and
With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.? The amplification and sugar-coating of this passage accentuates the statement he is trying to reason with the addressees. Once the attention is drawn, and all eyes are on him, he proceeds by exposing the tragedies that caused this mishap, and the catastrophic disaster they are enduring. ?Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.? Sympathetic toward both the north and south motives, he logically accepts that neither want to let their shield down, and lose everything they believe in. By delivering this compassion, Lincoln obtained listeners, as well as followers, and suddenly his compelling approach became effective.
Lincoln was a noble man. He was known as honest “Abe” when he practiced law. When he spoke he stood still and kept his hands behind his back. He used his words very cautiously but spoke with conviction and motivation. He was always very positive, hoping for a reconciliation between the states. “Lincoln's distinctively human and
Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas were the Democratic and Republican candidates for the U.S. Senate in Illinois. Their debates are admittedly the most famous political debates in American history. The biggest topic of debate during this time was slavery, therefore Lincoln and Douglas not only differed in their views on slavery, but also attempted to discredit the other candidate’s views by bringing up past speeches. Slavery was not the only topic during these debates, there were also debates on equality and state power over slavery.
Both Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln had goals for their country, the United States, both aimed for nearly the same idea for their nation. Where Frederick Douglass dedicated his life to achieving justice for all Americans, in particular African-Americans, women, and minority groups. He envisioned America as an inclusive nation strengthened by diversity and free of discrimination. On the other hand Abraham Lincoln wanted Uniting men from all parts of the country in pursuit of common goals, political parties formed powerful bonds of Union. Yet they could play this role only as long as the divisive issue of slavery remained outside the national political arena.
In Lincoln a photobiography Russell Freedman described Lincoln as Moody and Withdrawn. On page 14, a friend put it that he was “Witty, sad and reflective by all turns”.This was not the only thing said about him. On page 36, Lincoln faced a personal tragedy. His boy eddie came down ill and later died. This contributed to his sadness and later overall melancholy mood.
These two men both gave very influential speeches over the major conflicts going on within their times. Abraham Lincoln delivered his second Inaugural Address in 1865 to give the United States citizens some sort of direction and hope during the civil war. Abraham Lincoln states, “The progress of our arms, upon all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself; and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.” (Lincoln, 1865) to give the citizens some sort of comfort and hope for themselves and their loved ones as they fought in this conflict. Abraham Lincoln also makes it clear,