preview

Adjustment Disorders Case Study

Decent Essays

The worker provided a psychiatric history including being diagnosed and prescribed medication for chronic adjustment disorder with depressed and anxious mood while at school. The report details a history of the more recent events in the workplace with Ms Donna Mooney and the subsequent events regarding the allegations against the worker.

The report states that the worker's diagnosis continues as that of a chronic adjustment disorder with depressed and anxious mood. Ewer attributes 10% to the worker having been adopted and bullied at school, and 30% to her longstanding history of depression and anxiety. Further, he attributes 5% to her gender being a determinant in who develops anxiety and depression, and another 5% due to her longstanding …show more content…

• Dr Ewer failed to include that the reason for the exacerbation of the worker's symptoms was the basis of the claim.
• Dr Ewer failed to specify the positive personality traits of the worker.
• Dr Ewer did not note that the worker has friendships continuing from her schooling, and relationships with family and friends.
• Dr Ewer did not include that having been bullied at school made the worker more susceptible to harm from the bullying in the workplace.
• The worker's condition improved over the course of the 18 months following the demise of her defacto relationship.

Accordingly, he concludes that the aforementioned problems were stable, well controlled and did not impede her work performance, and that the work incidents that are the basis of the claim resulted in a significant exacerbation.

CEO'S STATEMENT
Mr Nathan Kinge made a statement dated 14 November 2016 that outlines the allegations of bullying and harassment made by the worker against Ms Donna …show more content…

He stated that Ms Mooney was readily available for any staff member who wished to speak to her, made easier by the location of Ms Mooney's office. Despite having spoken to the worker a number of times, at no stage did the worker indicate to him that there were any issues in terms of her relationship with Ms Mooney.

Regarding the worker's desire to have Marisa Romeo's attend a meeting on 1 November 2016, he felt that Ms Romeo's current employment as an HR manager at a competitor and her having displaying disdain towards him personally and RSL Care SA would have made it difficult for him to have an honest and open discussion with the worker in her presence.

He expressed disappointment at the worker's decision to bring Ms Romeo to the meeting despite having asked her not to do so, and he allowed the worker an hour to obtain an alternative support person. He also suggested alternative persons, or a professional external support person, and offered to reschedule the meeting. The worker refused the proposed alternatives and the meeting progressed. Having been given the allegations against her, Mr Kinge proposed a second meeting time at which the worker would respond. The meeting was scheduled, then rescheduled at the worker's request, at which time she did not

Get Access