preview

Adnan Syed: Guilty Case Study

Decent Essays

The Mysterious Trial The case of Adnan Syed became very popular after the journalist Sarah Koenig made a podcast with her group and collected all the information that related to Syed’s case. Sarah and her team made many interviews with Syed’s friends and the people who related to the case. The trial convicted that Syed had killed his ex-girlfriend. Many of Syed’s friends believe that Syed is not guilty. Also, many people who did not personally know Syed and read the case about him think he was not guilty. Other people see he involved in the case, so he is guilty. There are many doubts about the court's decision to imprison Syed lifetime. These doubts made this case mysterious. Syed may be not guilty if the detective, prosecutor, and the jury …show more content…

The case returned to Leakin Park, the large park in Baltimore City in Maryland. A maintenance department at a local school whose name was Mr. S found Lee’s body in the park on February 9, 1999. The detectives made an investigation with many of Adnan’s friends, but the court listened only to one witness whose name was Jay Wilds. The court listened to Jay, testimony about the Lee’s murder. Jay testified that Adnan killed Lee in the Best Buy parking lot facing Edmondson Avenue versus in Baltimore City. So, the court sentenced a teenager from Woodlawn High School whose name was Adnan Syed and convicted him of killing his ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee by strangling her with his hands. Syed’s family, his closest friend Saad, and Saad’s sister Rabia were in the court when they listened to Wilds’s testimony and the …show more content…

She wrote a letter after Syed arrested by the police. McClain appeared to prove that Adnan was with her in the same time of murder. She visited his home and she formed a letter to Adnan in prison (George). In this letter, she wrote to Syed “Dear Adnan-- I hope I spelled it right. I'm not sure if you remember talking to me in the library on January 13, but I remember chatting with you." (McClain) Also, in the bottom of the McClain’s letter she told him that her boyfriend and his friend saw him in the library. McClain asserts that the jury did not follow the legal requirements that they supposed to do in the trial. McClain is the only alibi that can prove that Syed was with her when she was in the library in the same time of the murder. McClain said Syed’s attorney Cristina Gutierrez did not contact her and hear her testimony. So, the jury should listen to her testimony and consider it very well because her testimony may change the judgment of the

Get Access