preview

Advocate And Serve

Good Essays

Crutchfield and Grant identify six practices of high impact nonprofits: advocate and serve, make markets work, inspire evangelists, nurture nonprofit networks, master the art of adaptation, and share leadership. All of these practices proved to be crucial in the success of the twelve-featured nonprofits, however, there are two practices that I find to be more intriguing than the rest. “Advocate and serve” and “inspire evangelists” are the two practices that stand out. The practice of “advocate and serve” was a new concept to me, which is, in part, why I found it particularly interesting. The practice of “inspiring evangelists,” is a concept I am familiar with, but I have never seen it articulated this well.
“Advocate and serve” is complex practice. …show more content…

An organization can risk offending or alienating certain groups of people if their advocacy is seen as too political or if it is too closely affiliated with one party over another. One instance of this we have seen recently is the Black Lives Matter movement. BLM describes itself as “a chapter-based national organization working for the validity of Black life. [We are] working to (re)build the Black liberation movement” (2012). While at this point, the BLM movement seems to be strictly an advocacy group, the level of backlash that the organization has received in the public sphere and in the media represents and justifies the fear that nonprofit organizations have when venturing into the world of advocacy. Advocacy can be misunderstood, it can be polarizing, and it could ultimately jeopardize the reputation and validity of an organization, but it can also play an essential role in affecting policy. Each organization has to determine if the level of risk associated with pursuing a path of advocacy is a risk they are willing to …show more content…

This could be the answer to the issue addressed by Berger and Neuhaus in their essay entitled, “To Empower People: From State to Civil Society.” They write about the paradox of the public’s desire for public services, coupled with their resistance to government intervention. When nonprofits are successful in advocating within the government sphere, they expand opportunities through means such as: increased government funding, tax breaks, changes to tax codes, policy changes, raised awareness, and, ultimately, changes to public behavior. These results allow nonprofits the opportunity to maximize their impact, therefore fulfilling the public need while keeping the government seemingly uninvolved.
Regardless of one’s beliefs on integrating advocacy and service, it is difficult to dispute that social aliments we face today stem from a deeper issue within the infrastructure of our society. Direct service organizations offer temporary solutions, a Band-Aid, if you will, to buy time for change. Advocacy groups aim to resolve the root problem that results in the need for the Band-Aid. We need direct service organizations. We need advocacy groups. Does it make sense for the two to be one in the

Get Access