preview

Against Capital Punishment Essay

Good Essays

Against Capital Punishment

What is the true value of a human life and how can one trade it for another? Isn’t it said repetitively in religion and government that each life should be treated equally? Then, how are we allowed to condemn a person to death? How can we make abortion illegal but capital punishment legal in certain circumstances? No matter what way you look at it capital punishment is murder. If each year there is about 250 people added to death row and 35 executed imagine how many of those people are actually innocent?

Whenever the government decides to sentence a criminal to death they always seem to forget that the death affects other people related to the person. Families can be ripped apart with siblings or parents …show more content…

The pope said on January 23, 1999 at the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City, “This is our cry: life with dignity for all! For all who have been conceived in their mother’s womb, for street children, for indigenous peoples and African-Americans, for immigrants and refugees, for the young deprived of opportunity, for the old, for those who suffer any kind of poverty or marginalization. Dear brothers and sisters, the time has come to banish once and for all from the continent every attack against life. No more violence, terrorism and drug trafficking! No more torture or other forms of abuse! There must be an end to the unnecessary recourse to the death penalty! No more exploitation of the weak, racial discrimination or ghettoes of poverty! Never again!”

Capital Punishment is unfair in its administration because statistics show that the poor and minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty than the wealthy. The wealthy are more likely to get off then the poor because they are wealthy or famous. Throughout history the courts have been biased with people who are wealthy and people who aren’t. For example, O.J. Simpson got off free when everyone knew he was guilty. What the media does not show is that the court was most likely bias towards the fact that he was well known even though all of the evidence proved he was guilty to the public. If the court system is improved then capital

Get Access