All You Need is Love: The History of the Peace Corps Essay

The United States has a long history of great leaders who, collectively, have possessed an even wider range of religious and political convictions. Perhaps not unexpectedly, their beliefs have often been in conflict with one another, both during coinciding eras, as well as over compared generations. The individual philosophies of William Jennings Bryan, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, with regard to America’s roles in world affairs and foreign diplomacy; are both varied and conflicted. Despite those conflicts however, each leader has left his own legacy behind, in terms of how the U.S. continues to engage in world affairs today.

Introduced by John F. Kennedy in 1961, the Peace Corps is an association dedicated to placing volunteers into developing nations. These volunteer educators, health workers, engineers, and farming workers help to improve the skills and quality of life for the native folks while living among them. The main goal of the Peace Corps is to encourage world peace and to increase common understanding between Americans and the people of other nations. The Peace Corp was, and still is a successful organization that

Our warriors were progressively being murdered by falling into pits, executed, injuring. The whole ordeal didn 't create the impression that our endeavors were achieving anything, it was painful. Since the Vietnam War were extended, secretary, Marshall Green, refer to the American policy at this time as “Widening down the war” This was for refusal of the political and popular to acknowledge resistance in America mounted, the organization spent increasingly of its political capital in this one territory.

It showed how America was handling the Cold War in a civil and inoffensive way. “The Americans ,of whatever age would be sought along to not only defend the country should be given an opportunity.” The Soviet Union communism expansion threatened the country, but American reactions were justified because they were appropriate and not impulsive. The Soviet propaganda pitted against the US was brash and audacious. Propaganda affected many people from other nations around the world and took a say in the general opinion of America. The Peace Corps representing America was the best possible and justifiable reaction of the US because it portrayed the country as passive and non-aggressive. The purpose of the Peace Corps was to spread the ways of democratic government and the nonviolent ways of the US. As well as, “This can only be countered by skill and dedication of Americans who are willing to spend their lives serving the cause of freedom.” The reputation of America was not well, and needed to be better represented at that time. The Peace Corps Organization was completely justifiable because it showed how the US was a not a dominating world superpower, contrary to the Soviet

First I will start by telling what the peace corps the peace corps is a volunteer program run by the United States government. John F. Kennedy ( JFK) started the peace corps to help out the people in need and give them chance and is giving them technical assistance. They have helped several people in the united states that was in need for shelter and in need for technical assistance. The united states mission of the peace corps provides technical assistance also helping the people outside the united states to help them understand American culture and to help Americans understand other country culture.

Early in the speech  President Eisenhower tells the nation about “America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment." (Eisenhower 7.)  Even with struggles with the war and congress in the air President Eisenhower still delivers America hope, and most importantly peace.  President Eisenhower begins to give credibility to America on the adventure of free government and the basic purposes that the country is all about.  President Eisenhower talks about progress for America and to keep thriving toward world peace and being better and making a better world, most importantly a better America for all to live in.  President Eisenhower gives great credibility in this speech using a great form of ethos in multiple

Against the backdrop of the Cold War and the looming specter of nuclear confrontation, Americans were confronted with pressing questions of democracy, freedom, and social progress. Although other actions could have caused change throughout this time, these actions show significant changes after

Though America was established with honorable and heroic intentions, unforgivable historical events such as the American Genocide Trail of Tears have effectively portrayed America’s incapability to follow John Winthrop’s A Model of Christian Charity.

Instead of locking the concept of militarism to a government based subject, Martin Luther King Junior viewed all forms of violence as forms of militarism. Fortunately, this topic not only affects our community but also every other community in America. To help end Militarism in America, we can look to allocate more money into topics such as social uplift instead of building up arms and troops. The King always believed that instead of physical war, you must conduct a mental war, where love is always the winner. We can look to solve our problems through reconciliation with other countries minimizing casualties on both sides and building stronger foreign national bonds. By depending on forms of nonviolence, we move one step closer to the idea of a true Beloved Community. Now on to the final step of the

Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community? Martin Luther King Jr. In 1967, King separated himself from the world and hid from the Civil Rights Movement. King writes out his thoughts, plans, and dreams for America’s future. As part of this plan he mentions what would come with this dream and that’s better jobs, houses, higher incomes, and better education. Most importantly King speaks out against the war. Kings speech titled “Beyond Vietnam”. Which explains the relationship of the Civil Rights and peace movement. King asked that all bombing stop in North and South Vietnam be an agreement and remove all troops and give the people of slavery a decision on reaching agreements. King believed that the Vietnam War took money and attention from programs that helped the poor. Furthermore, King said “the war was doing far more devastating the hopes of the poor at home we were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in Southwest Georgia and East Harlem (Martin Luther King, Jr speaks out against the war, ‘1967)

The peace movement had the vision of leaving the war and no more fighting, no more destruction, no more death. One would think that victory and peace should be able to reside together, but that was never really possible in the Vietnam War. It was just so negatively perceived that victory and peace become two separate distinctions. Victory meant fighting and war while peace meant no fighting and no war. In a way, only one side could win and the other couldn’t in the United States. It wasn’t just a war between the US and North Vietnam, but also liberalism vs. conservatism. Vietnam War deepened the divide in party politics throughout the US. With that, there could never be a true “victory” and/or true “peace”.

It can be hard to fully comprehend the effects the Vietnam War had on not just the veterans, but the nation as a whole. The violent battles and acts of war became all too common during the long years of the conflict. The war warped the soldiers and civilians characters and desensitized their mentalities to the cruelty seen on the battlefield. Bao Ninh and Tim O’Brien, both veterans of the war, narrate their experiences of the war and use the loss of love as a metaphor for the detrimental effects of the years of fighting.

One of the biggest strength of his insight is the application of physiological principles to international relations. Fulbright uses these to make sense of seemingly senseless actions by the United States, China and Vietnam. He expertly characterizes America as unrevolutionary, puritanical, and deeply ideological. In the same way, he includes historical context that also helps explain behaviors exhibited by those nations today. For example, he explains in detail how China’s history as a great civilization and then it’s colonization by Western powers has led to its isolationism and hostility towards the West. It is this application of history and physiology that presents a human view of the other side. It allows for a greater understanding of the complex forces influencing world relations today. This combats the dehumanization and misunderstanding between both sides of the conflict. Furthermore, many of the recommendations Fulbright made proved to be predictive. In the section “An Alternative for Vietnam”, Senator Fulbright proposes an eight-point program for the restoration of peace in Vietnam. Many of the points he listed where part of the Paris Peace Agreement of 1973. For example, there was a cease fire, the US safely withdrew its troops, and there were negotiations between the South Vietnamese government and the National liberation front which would allow for its

“The founding of the Peace Corps is one of President John F. Kennedy’s most enduring legacies.” (Founding). As soon as President Kennedy became the President, he vowed to help Americans be “active citizens.” One of his first moves in office was to create the Peace Corps. The way he came up with this idea of the Peace Corps was when he spoke to students at the University of Michigan during a campaign speech and challenged them to live and work in other countries to dedicate “themselves to the cause of peace and development.” (Peace). The main purpose for this was so “Americans can volunteer to work anywhere in the world where assistance is needed.” (John F. Kennedy, the 35th). This answers President Kennedy’s call to “ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.” (Founding).

Casting down your bucket among my people, helping and encouraging them as you are doing on these ground, and to education of the head, hand, and heart, you will find that they will buy your surplus land, make blossom the waste places in your field and run your factories. While doing this, you can be sure in the future, as in the past, that you and your families will be surrounded by the most patient, faithful, lawabiding, and unresentful people that the world has seen. As we have proved our loyalty to you in the past, in nursing your children, watching by the sickbed of your mothers and fathers, and often following them tear-dimmed eyes to their graves, so in the future, in our humbles ways, we shall stand by you with a devotion that no foreigner can approach, ready to lay down our lives, if need be, in your defense…….In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress (Washington 596)