America Needs the Stop-loss Program
The scary reality of the war on Iraq is something all Americans face today, the reality being, what happens if we do not have enough soldiers to continue all of the projects that the United States have already started. Does America have enough troops for what they are doing? Can America afford to tell people when they leave the military, thanks and we wish the best for you with civilian life, or should they be fighting to keep them as long as possible? America spend the money to keep the soldiers employed and across the waters to keep the promises made to make Iraq a democratic country? America needs to continue their fight, even if it means to maintain solders longer then they once
…show more content…
The “stop-loss program” also gives the military the power to keep soldiers in Iraq or Afghanistan (or any country there is a conflict going on in) for up to 24 months after their previously scheduled release date. If your troop is going to be shipped off, then you are lucky enough to go with them, until they are sent back.
The War on Iraq started on March 19, 2003 in order to give the Iraqi people the freedom they need and deserve. The original plan was to stay there for only one year (Thompson, “Stretching”) yet because we have not yet met the original plan, America is still there. Currently the military is attempting to train 200,000 Iraqi troops to take the place of the American soldiers by next August (Thompson, “Need”). That means the military will not be leaving Iraq until after that point, over two years longer than what was originally intended.
Not only are soldiers stationed in Iraq, but also soldiers are stationed in 120 nations around the world, from Mongolia (Thompson, “Need”) to the Southern Peninsula of Korea. The military is stretched beyond its limit, and needs to be able to keep all of these places filled with active duty soldiers. Because of how far it is starched it is very
According to the U.S. Department of Defense, the United States military now maintains a force of around 1.4 million active duty personnel. In times of relative peace, this is sufficient to protect U.S. interests at home and abroad. But when the United States engages in a larger scale operation, the military may need to call up reserve forces. In a major conflict, the United States may even institute the draft, drawing soldiers from the general civilian population.
There is much controversy surrounding the war in Iraq, both in terms of its legality, its practicality and its current course. Within all of these elements there are arguments to be found that suggest that the troops currently in Iraq should indeed come home. The main argument for bringing home the troops is that they shouldn't have been there in the first place, as no weapons of mass destruction were found, and they are now doing virtually nothing to help the situation, and may indeed be worsening it.
To begin with, the Iraq war lasted a very long time. The Iraq war began in 2003. In the text I read it stated the war was as long as a decade and ended 2011. 151,000 to 600,000 iraqs were killed in the first 3 to 4 years of the war. The Iraq war lasted a total 13 years.
Over the years there 's been a lot of controversy over the fact that U.S. troops are currently residing in Afghanistan and have been there since 2001. Many are wondering why we 're still there and why haven 't we left yet. Others want to know the positive outcomes of the roughly thirteen years that our troops have been there. Are we doing the right thing by being there?
To conclude, the United States should no deploy anymore troops to fight ISIS. As a country we should not be involved with a nation we just battled with. It is too dangerous to our troops and our citizens. Also when our troops are away from the Homefront, our nation becomes very vulnerable. By leaving us defenseless, ISIS is left with more opportunity. Not to mention, other nations need to learn how to defend themselves. Sometimes you must sink before you learn to swim, and it is not our duty to rescue them. Our militia is better off when they're on home
Sponsor: "But the Army won 't penalize us for failing to meet cost or for allowing the schedule to slip. If we fail to meet at least 60-70 per cent of the specifications limits: however, then we may well be in trouble. The Army knows there will be a follow-on contract request if we can meet specification limits. I consider 60-70 per cent of the specifications to be the minimum acceptable limits for the Army. The Army want the program kicked off right now.
Soldiers are often considered robots, meaning they have no real concern about the battle they are fighting. This is not true, especially in the case of the war on terrorism. If one were to ask a soldier what he thought of the war in Afghanistan, he would immediately tell you that it is a necessary war to keep the United States safe from the terrorists. Unfortunately, Americans do not think the same way soldiers or the families of soldiers do. Most Americans believe the war is a waste of time, money, and American resources. This thought process is not only wrong, but completely unfair to the troops serving. The Afghan war cannot be won by fighting or blood loss, but the war can and will be won by American occupation in Afghanistan.
The most obvious reason America should withdraw from Iraq is the number of lives that have been sacrificed on foreign soil, and the monumental cost put on the American tax payers in order to sustain this war on terror. In terms of American casualties, the Iraq war has killed almost 5,000 American fathers, mothers, brothers, and sisters. When you take into consideration the ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan, and random attacks against American contractors, the death toll rises even higher. The most tragic death toll from this senseless war have been the estimated 100,000 civilian deaths since American occupation in Iraq,
More Than 1000 soldiers have died in The middle east. In a nation of more than 306 million people, only the tiniest percentage of Americans have sacrificed to fight the long war in Iraq. As of last week, that war's sixth anniversary, at least 4,260 service members had died in Iraq, and more than 31,000 wounded soldiers. “The Army has been stretched so thin, in fact, that more than 140,000 troops have been ordered to serve on combat duty after their enlistments ended. That practice is known officially as "stop loss" and unofficially as a "backdoor draft." Should the USA stop deploying troops overseas because the government is sending troops to Eastern Europe for just revenue from oil companies? (Book/Database)
The 2003 Iraq War lasted less than three weeks. It began in the early morning hours of March 20, when American missiles struck Baghdad. By April 9, U.S. forces had advanced into Baghdad. By April 15 Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had vanished, and U.S. and allied officials pronounced the end of major combat operations. Although the war itself was short, arguments over whether it was justified had been made for months and years prior to the attack, and still continue today. Going to war in Iraq was not justified on many levels.
The United States of America's military is currently involved in two major wars with U.S. opposition in Afghanistan and Iraq. All though both of these efforts can be said to be in the clean-up stages, many more soldiers will be needed to stabilize the regions, to provide police work, and to fight the insurgencies that have risen in opposition to the invasion of U.S. troops into foreign lands. The current presidential administration states that to adequately deal with the problems of post-war Iraq and unstable Afghanistan the United States needs to increase the number of active-duty soldiers serving over-seas. Top officials in the administration have said that a reorganization of the military
President George W. Bush authorized the invasion of Iraq in 2003 citing that Saddam Hussein had been stockpiling weapons of mass destruction. In March of 2003 US led coalition forces entered the country and overthrew the Hussein regime. The conflict was very short causing some of the infantry units to not be used in combat. After the conflict ended many of these units were withdrawn from the country from lack of use. In the short term after the regime was toppled, there was still resistance from irregular units loyal to Saddam. A consequence of the early withdrawal of troops was the prolonged the need for American forces to remain in the country to end the resistance. The last of these combat troops were withdrawn in 2011 after eight
Despite shortcomings with the decision to go to war, how the war was actually carried out posed more problems. The administration had a very favorable view of how the war would go and how post-war issues would work themselves out. They were under the impression that this war would be like any other situation where a new government was put up, like in Japan, Germany, or in many former Soviet states. The US has never dealt with this situation in the Arab world, though. In many cases, administration’s expectations for the war were simply unrealistic – some estimates had all forces out of Iraq within a year and one comment led people to believe that Iraq’s reconstruction would only cost the US $1.7 billion.
The United States of America declared war on Iraq in the Spring of 2003 to free the Iraqi people from the oppressive rule of Saddam Hussein and to keep them safe, and to prevent future attacks from Iraq. Saddam Hussein killed, tortured, and raped thousands of people, especially those who opposed him. During the war the U.S. easily took over the capital of Iraq, Baghdad, and eventually found Hussein. Though the U.S. found Hussein there was still much to be accomplished in Iraq, but the most vital goal of the war was accomplish by the end of 2003.
I agree with the soldier‘s claim that they should not be forced to fight a war that they are unequipped to fight. The soldiers are being asked to fight in conditions in which they cannot win. The pace of the war was so fast that the army has outpaced the logistics of support. They are far away from home without food. They are running out of ammunition. Many of the soldiers are without boots. They march through swamps and lakes in freezing temperatures. The soldiers may die from exposure and not from actual battle with the enemy.