weapons against Japan in WWII On 6 August 1945, a B-29 Superfortress flew over the islands of Japan and unleashed the devastating power of the world’s first atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. Was the United States justified in dropping the bomb? This depends largely on your point of view. I believe that the U.S. was justified in dropping the nuclear bombs for three main reasons. The first was the unprovoked viscous attack on Pearl Harbor. The attack on Pearl Harbor which had taken place three and a half
surrender to allied troops. America was left to decide whether to drop the atomic bombs on Japan or not. America was justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan as militarily sustained Japan’s surrender to bring an end to the horrific war and economically saved America millions of dollars. However morally, America’s decision was unprincipled and dishonorable to mankind. Militarily, America was inclined to drop the atomic bomb, as Japanese troops would not surrender due to their strict code of fighting
Nagasaki, Japan on August 6th and 9th of 1945 brought about several reactions in the United States. Starting with the controversial events leading up to the atomic with the Potsdam Proclamation, many Americans began to wonder whether the total destruction of these two cities were necessary. However, immediate American responses and reactions to the bombs were contrary to what they became later on. Americans slowly stopped being ignorant of what had happened in Japan and began to question the actions of
the Allies in 1945, is valuable source when analyzing the necessity of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki because it gives a more in-depth look at the Japanese perspective. Hearing Showa’s side of the war shows how the Japanese felt about the bombs and how necessary they were in the war as far as bringing about Japanese surrender. The text of this document was spoken by Emperor Showa of Japan, and it was addressed to all of the people of Japan. This was the first time that most people had ever
America's decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan was only done to assert our position over the Soviet Union, and Japan's surrender was only an extra accomplishment of the attack. During the years 1939 to 1947, numerous conferences were held to discuss diplomatic matters, and the strive towards getting Japan to accept an unconditional surrender. The Japanese had already been weakened, and the military predicted that they would eventually be forced to surrender in a short amount of time. Even the
The justifications of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been continuously debated since the time of occurrence. The variety of approaches towards the topic often times lead to ambiguous conclusions that leave debaters dumbfounded. Primarily, there are two moral reasonings that analysts of the event utilize: the utilitarian approach and ethical tradition. The utilitarian approach determines the goodness or evil of an action by its consequences (Holt). It has been said that this approach
suffering, without suffering we would never learn from our mistakes. To make it right, pain and suffering is the key to windows, without it, there is no way of life.” On August 6, 1945 the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a small city whose death toll rises to 90,000-166,000. On August 9th, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, 60,000–80,000 . In total, 15 million people lost their lives during the duration of the Second World War. In John Hersey's book, Hiroshima, he provides a detailed account
American war effort, and saw atomic weaponry as a way out of the most monumental war ever. As discussed in Cabell Phillips’ book, The Truman Presidency: The History of a Triumphant Succession, Stimson was once quoted as saying that the atomic bomb has “more effect on human affairs than the theory of Copernicus and the Law of Gravity” (55). Stimson, a defendant of dropping the bomb on Japan, felt that the world would never be the same. If the world would change after using atomic weapons, could it possibly
before the Atomic bombing of Hiroshima. The petition came at a time in the war when America had already committed massive amounts of resources to creating a nuclear weapon. It was written by Leo Szilard; his signature appears on the bottom left corner of the document. Szilard was a key figure in the Manhattan project, working at the Chicago Metallurgical lab. The purpose of his petition initially appears obvious; it seems that Szilard wants the President to reconsider the plan to bomb Japan in light
Behind The Atomic Bombs Tanner Wells Mr.Blasini GOVT 2305.001 4/13/2017 Truman’s decision to use the atomic bombs on Japan has been a controversial issue since they were dropped in 1945. Arguments have been made to support and condemn the use of atomic weapons. The use of the atomic bombs in World War II swiftly ended the conflict, but debates have surrounded the ethical, political, and moral decisions to use these weapons to end the lives of the citizens of Japan. The use of the two