Amritsar Massacre Research Paper

On March 5, 1770, British soldiers shot and killed five people on King Street in Boston Massachusetts. This incident is now known as the “Boston Massacre.” The soldiers were under attack of a heckling, snowballing mob of American colonists. The colonists- “Patriots”- were protesting the British troops presence in their city. The troops were sent to Boston in 1768 to enforce unpopular taxation measures passed by British Parliament that lacked American representation.

On the evening of March 5, 1770 the Boston Massacre started on king street because of a small argument between Hugh White and a few colonists, it began to increase as more colonists came and began to beat, throw sticks, and snowballs at Hugh White . Soon there were 50 colonists at the area of the scene. Captain Thomas Preston sent some soldiers to the custom house to take order. The sight of the British soldiers were armed with bayonets which made the crowd shout at them and daring them to fire.

Next off there is the Boston Massacre. On December 5th, 1770. A rowdy group of colonists were in the streets. There were rumors of them attacking the customs house and an officer. To protect the customs house, some soldiers and an officer were sent. In the streets they were harassed and dared to fire. Soldiers were supposedly being pelted with ice and snow balls, clubs, etc., and through the commotion a soldier fired sparking other soldiers to fired and the killed five colonists in the streets. This was used as propaganda and promoted as if the British killed colonists in a cruel and inhuman fashion. The Boston Massacre was one of many events that helped cause the American Revolution.

The Mountain Meadow Massacre was the killing of roughly 120 immigrants who were passing through Southern Utah. Immigrant men, women and children were traveling from Arkansas to California and they were riding a Baker Fancher wagon train. Later that day they were killed by a group a Mormons with the help of local Paiute Indians. For a century and a half the Mountain Meadow Massacre has shocked and distressed those who have learned of it. I wouldn’t blame them because this was something brutal. This tragedy deeply grieved the victim’s relatives, burdened the perpetrator's’ descendants and Church members generally with sorrow and feelings of collective guilt, unleashed criticism

On March 5, 1770, there was a clash between a “patriot” mob throwing snowballs, stones and sticks, and a party of British soldiers, armed with charged bayonets. (Document 2). There was a massacre on March 5, 1770, in Boston, because the British men overreacted and killed colonists in an unfair way. The first reason why it was a massacre was the cruelty of the British. The evidence that supports my claim is when the colonists were provoking the British with snowballs and such, the British captain commanded his troops to fire, yelling, “Damn you, fire, be the consequence what it will!”

An Atlanta mother called 911 for help, when police entered the home they found a family massacre, now the mother of five children is behind bars for the deadly stabbing attack on her family.

The Boston Massacre was a major event that happened March 5, 1770. On King street, violence broke with British Government. In the city of Boston a huge fight broke out between the British soldiers and the colonists. The enormous fight endangered many people. There were also people killed during the vicious fight. Crispus Attuck was the first to hit bottom when the fight broke out. The incident heavily publicized by leading patriots, such as Paul Revere and Samuel Adams, to encourage rebellion against the British authorities. On the snowy evening a British soldier named Hugh White became involved in a confrontation with the citizens. Hugh white struck a little boy named Edward Garrick with the butt of his rifle for insulting a British officer

"...he really thought they did fire to defend themselves." The Bloody Massacre was a killing of five people and six others were wounded. A more commonly known name is the Boston Massacre. This was also a key event that led to the start of the Revolutionary War.

The Boston Massacre is not as unknown as it seems. Although there are some events left to a mystery, there are sources from that time, whose information matches up.

On the night of the massacre the 8th regiment and 29th regiment had a conflict with a crowd of patriots. It all began with some schoolboys in King Street who threw snowballs at the soldiers of the 8th regiment. Sooner, a crowd gathered and continued throwing snowballs, ice, and rocks while also taunting the soldiers. Consequently, the 29th regiment was called, consisting of nine soldiers, for backup. The captain, Captain Thomas Preston, commanded the soldiers not to shoot while the crowd chanted “Fire and be damned.” Contradictory, someone fired at the crowd. It can be concluded that the soldier may, perhaps, did not hear the command due to the loud chaos. Now the question lies between on who was right. Is it wrong to turn to violence when pushed to the breaking point? Or is it wrong to torment those who have also tormented

Many events in history have been called “massacres”. They often resulted in hundreds of deaths, such as the slaughter of natives that came with the colonization of the Americas. Yet one of the most famous and significant massacres in American history resulted in only a handful of deaths. On May fifth, 1775, a mob of colonists attacked a patrol of nine British soldiers, who then fired upon the mob. Five colonists were killed, and six others injured (“Boston Massacre”). Preserved in an engraving by Paul Revere, these deaths became a rallying cry of rebellion for the American colonists. The event came to be known as the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre was a turning point in the colonists’ rebellion against Britain. This crucial event

The firing on that fort will inaugurate a civil war greater than any the world has yet seen…you will lose us every friend at the North. You will wantonly strike a hornet’s nest which extends from mountains to ocean. Legions now quiet will swarm out and string us to death. It is unnecessary. It put us in the wrong. It is fatal. –Robert Toombs. (Boerner paragraph 2).

The Militia kept attacking and following the British as they retreated, which directly caused the deaths of their own men as well as some British soldiers. According to both sources, after the British retreated and effectively surrendered they were followed by the Militia and constantly attacked, ambushed and shot at as they walked 15 miles carrying their dead and wounded. The rebels had won, and yet they continued to slaughter the Red Coats as they retreated. This was unnecessary and completely barbaric on their part. And it clearly shows that the deaths on both sides are their fault. If the Militia hadn’t followed the British then none of the Troops that were killed from that moment on would have died because the British had retreated. Why they did it will most likely never be known, but the utter savagery of the rebel’s acts should never be forgotten. In fact, A British Account explains that, “...Such was the cruelty and barbarity of the rebels, that they scalped and cut off the ears of some of the wounded men who fell into their hands…” Men who were already wounded, that lay dying alone in puddles of blood spent their last moments being scalped, cut and trampled in the fray. Scalping in and of itself is tremendously painful and can be fatal due to blood loss, but to take someone who is already wounded and commit such an act upon them? That would take utter barbarity and a complete lack of concern. The rebels and their cowardly, cruel actions were completely at fault not only for the crimes perpetrated at those battles but for the large body count left

They released an article in the London Chronicle stating how multiple troops were “attacked and insulted by the mob”. The newspaper emphasized firing was the only justification towards everything that had been going on. They said firing was a form of self-defense against the mob. Meaning that when the soldiers left willingly-- once the Boston Council decided it was better for them to leave the inhabitants of the town-- it was implied that the British were sensible and all they were trying to do was protect themselves. Along with these statements, the British constantly attempted to prove themselves as innocent.

The Boston Massacre was and is still a debatable Massacre. The event occurred on March 5, 1776. It involved the rope workers of the colonial Boston and two British regiments, the twenty-ninth and the fourteenth regiments. Eleven people were shot in the incident; five people were killed and the other six were merely wounded. The soldiers and the captain, Thomas Preston, were all put on trial. All were acquitted of charges of murder, however the two soldiers who fired first, Private Mathew Killroy, and Private William Montgomery, the two soldiers were guilty of manslaughter. The causes were numerous for this event. There had been a nation wide long-term dislike towards the British, and a growing hatred towards them by the people of Boston.